地理和社会距离对医生的影响:采用在线健康社区的证据

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Systems Research Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1287/isre.2020.0663
Panpan Wang, Liuyi He, Jifeng Luo, Zhiyan Wu, Han Zhang
{"title":"地理和社会距离对医生的影响:采用在线健康社区的证据","authors":"Panpan Wang, Liuyi He, Jifeng Luo, Zhiyan Wu, Han Zhang","doi":"10.1287/isre.2020.0663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the increasing popularity of telehealth, the diffusion of online health communities lags behind because of the limited physician participation. The low adoption levels of telehealth could be attributed to the social environment rather than a baseline reluctance to adopt. By utilizing a panel data set of physicians’ adoption over eight years, we empirically investigate the impacts of geographically and socially close adopters and examined the interaction of proximity influences and competition in adoption. Our results suggest that positive effects of both geographic and social proximity influence on adoption when local competition among physicians on OHCs is low. The positive impact of socially close prior adopters increases with local competition, whereas that of geographically close prior adopters decreases with local competition. Therefore, online health communities could leverage proximity influence by incorporating information cues such as the cumulative adoption rates of close peers to facilitate physician adoption. However, the framing of information cues should consider interactions of competition and proximity influence. Platform managers need to balance the direct crowding-in effect of competition and the adverse moderating effect by which it diminishes the influence of geographic proximity, especially for low-title physicians. For high-title physicians, who are more independent, emphasize the usefulness of online platforms.","PeriodicalId":48411,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Geographic and Social Proximity on Physicians: Evidence from the Adoption of an Online Health Community\",\"authors\":\"Panpan Wang, Liuyi He, Jifeng Luo, Zhiyan Wu, Han Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/isre.2020.0663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the increasing popularity of telehealth, the diffusion of online health communities lags behind because of the limited physician participation. The low adoption levels of telehealth could be attributed to the social environment rather than a baseline reluctance to adopt. By utilizing a panel data set of physicians’ adoption over eight years, we empirically investigate the impacts of geographically and socially close adopters and examined the interaction of proximity influences and competition in adoption. Our results suggest that positive effects of both geographic and social proximity influence on adoption when local competition among physicians on OHCs is low. The positive impact of socially close prior adopters increases with local competition, whereas that of geographically close prior adopters decreases with local competition. Therefore, online health communities could leverage proximity influence by incorporating information cues such as the cumulative adoption rates of close peers to facilitate physician adoption. However, the framing of information cues should consider interactions of competition and proximity influence. Platform managers need to balance the direct crowding-in effect of competition and the adverse moderating effect by which it diminishes the influence of geographic proximity, especially for low-title physicians. For high-title physicians, who are more independent, emphasize the usefulness of online platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0663\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管远程保健越来越受欢迎,但由于医生的参与有限,在线保健社区的推广却相对滞后。远程医疗采用率低的原因可能是社会环境,而不是基线不愿采用。通过利用八年来医生采用远程医疗的面板数据集,我们对地理上和社会上接近的采用者的影响进行了实证研究,并考察了采用过程中接近影响和竞争的相互作用。我们的研究结果表明,当当地医生之间在 OHC 上的竞争程度较低时,地理位置和社会距离都会对采用产生积极影响。社交关系密切的先前采用者的积极影响会随着当地竞争的加剧而增加,而地理关系密切的先前采用者的积极影响则会随着当地竞争的加剧而减少。因此,在线健康社区可以通过纳入信息线索(如关系密切的同行的累积采用率)来利用近距离影响,从而促进医生的采用。不过,信息提示的设置应考虑竞争和近距离影响的相互作用。平台管理者需要平衡竞争的直接挤入效应和不利的调节效应,因为竞争会削弱地理邻近性的影响,尤其是对低职称医生而言。对于独立性较强的高职称医生,应强调在线平台的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Geographic and Social Proximity on Physicians: Evidence from the Adoption of an Online Health Community
Despite the increasing popularity of telehealth, the diffusion of online health communities lags behind because of the limited physician participation. The low adoption levels of telehealth could be attributed to the social environment rather than a baseline reluctance to adopt. By utilizing a panel data set of physicians’ adoption over eight years, we empirically investigate the impacts of geographically and socially close adopters and examined the interaction of proximity influences and competition in adoption. Our results suggest that positive effects of both geographic and social proximity influence on adoption when local competition among physicians on OHCs is low. The positive impact of socially close prior adopters increases with local competition, whereas that of geographically close prior adopters decreases with local competition. Therefore, online health communities could leverage proximity influence by incorporating information cues such as the cumulative adoption rates of close peers to facilitate physician adoption. However, the framing of information cues should consider interactions of competition and proximity influence. Platform managers need to balance the direct crowding-in effect of competition and the adverse moderating effect by which it diminishes the influence of geographic proximity, especially for low-title physicians. For high-title physicians, who are more independent, emphasize the usefulness of online platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.20%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: ISR (Information Systems Research) is a journal of INFORMS, the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. Information Systems Research is a leading international journal of theory, research, and intellectual development, focused on information systems in organizations, institutions, the economy, and society.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Situational Achievement Goals on Online Learning Behavior: Results from Field Experiments Unveiling the Cost of Free: How an Ad-Sponsored Model Affects Serialized Digital Content Creation Better Is Better? Signaling Paradoxes in Performance-Based Advertising Opening First-Party App Resources: Empirical Evidence of Free-Riding Stress from Digital Work: Toward a Unified View of Digital Hindrance Stressors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1