Jessica T. Li, Amanda MM. Duddy, Michelle Cardona, V. Pasupuleti, Adrián V. Hernández
{"title":"β-受体阻滞剂对接受化疗的癌症患者心脏毒性的疗效和危害:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jessica T. Li, Amanda MM. Duddy, Michelle Cardona, V. Pasupuleti, Adrián V. Hernández","doi":"10.5114/aoms/189501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In patients with breast cancer and lymphoma, anthracyclines are associated with early and late dose-related cardiotoxicity. We systematically evaluated efficacy and harms of the use of beta-blockers in breast cancer and lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy.We searched five engines, and pre-prints until October 10, 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating beta-blockers for anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity in breast cancer and lymphoma patients. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameter (LVEDD, LVESD), peak E’ velocity, E/A ratio, E/e’ ratio, NT-pro BNP levels. Secondary outcome was heart rate. Inverse variance random effect meta-analyses were performed, and we used GRADE methods to assess quality of evidence (QoE).Twelve RCTs were selected (n=1,794), seven RCTs evaluated carvedilol. Mean ages were 39 to 52 years-old, 88.5% were women; 79.4% had breast cancer, and 11.5% lymphoma. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of beta-blockers on all-cause mortality (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.37, 12 RCTs, I2=0%, very low QoE), LVEF (MD 2.73%, 95%CI -0.45% to 5.92%, 12 RCTs, I2=93%, very low QoE), and heart rate (MD -9.14 bpm, 95%CI -15.02 to -3.26, two RCTs, I2=87%, very low QoE) vs. controls. Beta-blockers likely reduced NT-pro BNP levels slightly (MD -15.35 pg/mL, 95%CI -22.39 to -8.31, two RCTs, I2=0%, moderate QoE). There were no effects on other outcomes, all with very low QoE.Prophylactic use of beta-blockers for cardioprotection had little to no effect on all-cause mortality, LVEF or cardiac function outcomes in cancer patients undergoing anthracycline therapy.","PeriodicalId":8278,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and harms associated with beta-blockers for cardiotoxicity in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica T. Li, Amanda MM. Duddy, Michelle Cardona, V. Pasupuleti, Adrián V. Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/aoms/189501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In patients with breast cancer and lymphoma, anthracyclines are associated with early and late dose-related cardiotoxicity. We systematically evaluated efficacy and harms of the use of beta-blockers in breast cancer and lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy.We searched five engines, and pre-prints until October 10, 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating beta-blockers for anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity in breast cancer and lymphoma patients. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameter (LVEDD, LVESD), peak E’ velocity, E/A ratio, E/e’ ratio, NT-pro BNP levels. Secondary outcome was heart rate. Inverse variance random effect meta-analyses were performed, and we used GRADE methods to assess quality of evidence (QoE).Twelve RCTs were selected (n=1,794), seven RCTs evaluated carvedilol. Mean ages were 39 to 52 years-old, 88.5% were women; 79.4% had breast cancer, and 11.5% lymphoma. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of beta-blockers on all-cause mortality (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.37, 12 RCTs, I2=0%, very low QoE), LVEF (MD 2.73%, 95%CI -0.45% to 5.92%, 12 RCTs, I2=93%, very low QoE), and heart rate (MD -9.14 bpm, 95%CI -15.02 to -3.26, two RCTs, I2=87%, very low QoE) vs. controls. Beta-blockers likely reduced NT-pro BNP levels slightly (MD -15.35 pg/mL, 95%CI -22.39 to -8.31, two RCTs, I2=0%, moderate QoE). There were no effects on other outcomes, all with very low QoE.Prophylactic use of beta-blockers for cardioprotection had little to no effect on all-cause mortality, LVEF or cardiac function outcomes in cancer patients undergoing anthracycline therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Medical Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/189501\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/189501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and harms associated with beta-blockers for cardiotoxicity in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
In patients with breast cancer and lymphoma, anthracyclines are associated with early and late dose-related cardiotoxicity. We systematically evaluated efficacy and harms of the use of beta-blockers in breast cancer and lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy.We searched five engines, and pre-prints until October 10, 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating beta-blockers for anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity in breast cancer and lymphoma patients. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameter (LVEDD, LVESD), peak E’ velocity, E/A ratio, E/e’ ratio, NT-pro BNP levels. Secondary outcome was heart rate. Inverse variance random effect meta-analyses were performed, and we used GRADE methods to assess quality of evidence (QoE).Twelve RCTs were selected (n=1,794), seven RCTs evaluated carvedilol. Mean ages were 39 to 52 years-old, 88.5% were women; 79.4% had breast cancer, and 11.5% lymphoma. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of beta-blockers on all-cause mortality (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.37, 12 RCTs, I2=0%, very low QoE), LVEF (MD 2.73%, 95%CI -0.45% to 5.92%, 12 RCTs, I2=93%, very low QoE), and heart rate (MD -9.14 bpm, 95%CI -15.02 to -3.26, two RCTs, I2=87%, very low QoE) vs. controls. Beta-blockers likely reduced NT-pro BNP levels slightly (MD -15.35 pg/mL, 95%CI -22.39 to -8.31, two RCTs, I2=0%, moderate QoE). There were no effects on other outcomes, all with very low QoE.Prophylactic use of beta-blockers for cardioprotection had little to no effect on all-cause mortality, LVEF or cardiac function outcomes in cancer patients undergoing anthracycline therapy.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Medical Science (AMS) publishes high quality original articles and reviews of recognized scientists that deal with all scientific medicine. AMS opens the possibilities for young, capable scientists. The journal would like to give them a chance to have a publication following matter-of-fact, professional review by outstanding, famous medical scientists. Thanks to that they will have an opportunity to present their study results and/or receive useful advice about the mistakes they have made so far.
The second equally important aim is a presentation of review manuscripts of recognized scientists about the educational capacity, in order that young scientists, often at the beginning of their scientific carrier, could constantly deepen their medical knowledge and be up-to-date with current guidelines and trends in world-wide medicine. The fact that our educational articles are written by world-famous scientists determines their innovation and the highest quality.