卵垫齿轮固定和收集效果的实验评估。

IF 0.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.3996/jfwm-23-018
Madeline G. Tomczak, Robin L. DeBruyne, Brian A. Schmidt, Dustin A. Bowser, Jason L. Fischer, Gregory W. Kennedy, Nicole R. King, Christine M. Mayer, E. Roseman
{"title":"卵垫齿轮固定和收集效果的实验评估。","authors":"Madeline G. Tomczak, Robin L. DeBruyne, Brian A. Schmidt, Dustin A. Bowser, Jason L. Fischer, Gregory W. Kennedy, Nicole R. King, Christine M. Mayer, E. Roseman","doi":"10.3996/jfwm-23-018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Assessment of egg deposition is widely used to provide an index of spawning efforts for lithophilic spawning fishes. However, little is known about the collection efficacy and bias of fish egg collection methods. We conducted a two-phased study consisting of a simulated-river flume study (two-part design), and a field study (an egg drift comparison with capture on mats) to assess egg collection methods and evaluate egg retention and capture on egg mats. Lake whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis egg retention on seeded mats decreased with increasing velocity and walleye Sander vitreus egg retention was variable as velocity increased. Fewer lake whitefish eggs were collected on egg mats when limestone reef rock was present in the flume study during the simulated spawned trials, but the inverse was true for walleye. Similarly, during field collections more lake whitefish eggs were collected in benthic D-shaped frame (D-frame) drift nets set near a known spawning reef compared to egg mats set on the reef, indicating lake whitefish eggs were drifting downstream along the river bottom. In contrast, fewer walleye eggs were observed in D-frame drift nets compared to number of eggs captured on the egg mats. Therefore, egg mats are an informative tool for evaluating walleye egg deposition in an immediate area but may underestimate egg deposition of lake whitefish, especially in lotic systems. Compared to other egg collection methods in the current literature, our study indicates that egg mats are useful for assessing egg deposition by lithophilic spawning fishes, but that the collection and retention efficacy and bias of this gear may vary between species and habitat types.","PeriodicalId":49036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Assessment of Egg Mat Gear Retention and Collection Efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"Madeline G. Tomczak, Robin L. DeBruyne, Brian A. Schmidt, Dustin A. Bowser, Jason L. Fischer, Gregory W. Kennedy, Nicole R. King, Christine M. Mayer, E. Roseman\",\"doi\":\"10.3996/jfwm-23-018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Assessment of egg deposition is widely used to provide an index of spawning efforts for lithophilic spawning fishes. However, little is known about the collection efficacy and bias of fish egg collection methods. We conducted a two-phased study consisting of a simulated-river flume study (two-part design), and a field study (an egg drift comparison with capture on mats) to assess egg collection methods and evaluate egg retention and capture on egg mats. Lake whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis egg retention on seeded mats decreased with increasing velocity and walleye Sander vitreus egg retention was variable as velocity increased. Fewer lake whitefish eggs were collected on egg mats when limestone reef rock was present in the flume study during the simulated spawned trials, but the inverse was true for walleye. Similarly, during field collections more lake whitefish eggs were collected in benthic D-shaped frame (D-frame) drift nets set near a known spawning reef compared to egg mats set on the reef, indicating lake whitefish eggs were drifting downstream along the river bottom. In contrast, fewer walleye eggs were observed in D-frame drift nets compared to number of eggs captured on the egg mats. Therefore, egg mats are an informative tool for evaluating walleye egg deposition in an immediate area but may underestimate egg deposition of lake whitefish, especially in lotic systems. Compared to other egg collection methods in the current literature, our study indicates that egg mats are useful for assessing egg deposition by lithophilic spawning fishes, but that the collection and retention efficacy and bias of this gear may vary between species and habitat types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-23-018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-23-018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鱼卵沉积评估被广泛用于提供嗜石产卵鱼类的产卵指数。然而,人们对鱼卵收集方法的收集效果和偏差知之甚少。我们分两个阶段进行了一项研究,包括一项模拟河流水槽研究(两部分设计)和一项实地研究(鱼卵漂流与鱼卵垫捕获比较),以评估鱼卵收集方法,并评价鱼卵保留和鱼卵垫捕获情况。种垫上的湖白鲑(Coregonus clupeaformis)卵存留率随着流速的增加而降低,而马口铁(Sander vitreus)卵存留率则随着流速的增加而变化。在模拟产卵试验期间,当水槽研究中存在石灰岩礁石时,在卵垫上收集到的湖白鲑鱼卵较少,但马口铁鱼的情况正好相反。同样,在野外采集过程中,在已知产卵礁附近设置的底栖 D 形框(D 框)流网与在礁石上设置的卵垫相比,采集到的湖白鲑卵更多,这表明湖白鲑卵沿着河底向下游漂流。相反,与卵垫上捕获的卵数量相比,在 D 形框流网中观察到的马口鱼卵数量较少。因此,卵垫是评估附近区域马口鱼卵沉积情况的一种信息工具,但可能会低估湖白鲑卵的沉积情况,尤其是在地段系统中。与目前文献中的其他卵收集方法相比,我们的研究表明,卵垫有助于评估嗜石性产卵鱼类的卵沉积情况,但这种工具的收集和保留效果以及偏差可能因物种和生境类型而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental Assessment of Egg Mat Gear Retention and Collection Efficacy.
Assessment of egg deposition is widely used to provide an index of spawning efforts for lithophilic spawning fishes. However, little is known about the collection efficacy and bias of fish egg collection methods. We conducted a two-phased study consisting of a simulated-river flume study (two-part design), and a field study (an egg drift comparison with capture on mats) to assess egg collection methods and evaluate egg retention and capture on egg mats. Lake whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis egg retention on seeded mats decreased with increasing velocity and walleye Sander vitreus egg retention was variable as velocity increased. Fewer lake whitefish eggs were collected on egg mats when limestone reef rock was present in the flume study during the simulated spawned trials, but the inverse was true for walleye. Similarly, during field collections more lake whitefish eggs were collected in benthic D-shaped frame (D-frame) drift nets set near a known spawning reef compared to egg mats set on the reef, indicating lake whitefish eggs were drifting downstream along the river bottom. In contrast, fewer walleye eggs were observed in D-frame drift nets compared to number of eggs captured on the egg mats. Therefore, egg mats are an informative tool for evaluating walleye egg deposition in an immediate area but may underestimate egg deposition of lake whitefish, especially in lotic systems. Compared to other egg collection methods in the current literature, our study indicates that egg mats are useful for assessing egg deposition by lithophilic spawning fishes, but that the collection and retention efficacy and bias of this gear may vary between species and habitat types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management encourages submission of original, high quality, English-language scientific papers on the practical application and integration of science to conservation and management of native North American fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats in the following categories: Articles, Notes, Surveys and Issues and Perspectives. Papers that do not relate directly to native North American fish, wildlife plants or their habitats may be considered if they highlight species that are closely related to, or conservation issues that are germane to, those in North America.
期刊最新文献
Using UAVs Equipped With Thermal Cameras To Survey A Known Population Of White-tailed Deer Trends in American alligator pods in Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge Applications of Underwater Video for Imperiled Fish Species Population Monitoring Experimental Assessment of Egg Mat Gear Retention and Collection Efficacy. Environmental drivers and fitness consequences of partial migration under climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1