尽管发生了短暂的变化,但 COVID-19 大流行对印度公民科学参与的大规模影响微乎其微

Karthik Thrikkadeeri, Ashwin Viswanathan
{"title":"尽管发生了短暂的变化,但 COVID-19 大流行对印度公民科学参与的大规模影响微乎其微","authors":"Karthik Thrikkadeeri, Ashwin Viswanathan","doi":"10.1093/ornithapp/duae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Many parts of the world lack the large and coordinated volunteer networks required for systematic monitoring of bird populations. In these regions, citizen science programs offer an alternative with their semi-structured data, but the utility of these data is contingent on how, where, and how comparably birdwatchers watch birds, year on year. Trends inferred from the data can be confounded during years when birdwatchers may behave differently, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic. We wanted to ascertain how the data uploaded from India to one such citizen science platform, eBird, were impacted by this deadly global pandemic. To understand whether eBird data from the pandemic years in India are comparable to data from adjacent years, we explored several characteristics of the data, such as how often people watched birds in groups or at public locations, at multiple spatial and temporal scales. We found that the volume of data generated increased during the pandemic years 2020–2021 compared to 2019. Data characteristics changed largely only during the peak pandemic months (April–May 2020 and April–May 2021) associated with high fatality rates and strict lockdowns. These changes in data characteristics (e.g., greater site fidelity and less group birding) were possibly due to the decreased human mobility and social interaction in these periods. The data from the remainder of these restrictive years remained similar to those of the adjacent years, thereby reducing the impact of the aberrant peak months on any annual inference. Our findings show that birdwatchers in India as contributors to citizen science rapidly returned to their pre-pandemic behavior, and that the effects of the pandemic on birdwatching effort and birdwatcher behavior are scale- and context-dependent. In summary, eBird data from the pandemic years in India remain useful for abundance trend estimation and similar large-scale applications, but will benefit from preliminary data quality checks when utilized at a fine scale.","PeriodicalId":125764,"journal":{"name":"Ornithological Applications","volume":"46 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Despite short-lived changes, COVID-19 pandemic had minimal large-scale impact on citizen science participation in India\",\"authors\":\"Karthik Thrikkadeeri, Ashwin Viswanathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ornithapp/duae024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Many parts of the world lack the large and coordinated volunteer networks required for systematic monitoring of bird populations. In these regions, citizen science programs offer an alternative with their semi-structured data, but the utility of these data is contingent on how, where, and how comparably birdwatchers watch birds, year on year. Trends inferred from the data can be confounded during years when birdwatchers may behave differently, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic. We wanted to ascertain how the data uploaded from India to one such citizen science platform, eBird, were impacted by this deadly global pandemic. To understand whether eBird data from the pandemic years in India are comparable to data from adjacent years, we explored several characteristics of the data, such as how often people watched birds in groups or at public locations, at multiple spatial and temporal scales. We found that the volume of data generated increased during the pandemic years 2020–2021 compared to 2019. Data characteristics changed largely only during the peak pandemic months (April–May 2020 and April–May 2021) associated with high fatality rates and strict lockdowns. These changes in data characteristics (e.g., greater site fidelity and less group birding) were possibly due to the decreased human mobility and social interaction in these periods. The data from the remainder of these restrictive years remained similar to those of the adjacent years, thereby reducing the impact of the aberrant peak months on any annual inference. Our findings show that birdwatchers in India as contributors to citizen science rapidly returned to their pre-pandemic behavior, and that the effects of the pandemic on birdwatching effort and birdwatcher behavior are scale- and context-dependent. In summary, eBird data from the pandemic years in India remain useful for abundance trend estimation and similar large-scale applications, but will benefit from preliminary data quality checks when utilized at a fine scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ornithological Applications\",\"volume\":\"46 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ornithological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duae024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duae024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界上许多地方都缺乏系统监测鸟类种群所需的庞大而协调的志愿者网络。在这些地区,公民科学计划提供的半结构化数据是一种替代方法,但这些数据的实用性取决于观鸟者如何、在何处以及如何逐年进行可比性观鸟。在观鸟者行为不同的年份,例如 COVID-19 大流行期间,从数据中推断出的趋势可能会被混淆。我们希望了解从印度上传到 eBird 这样一个公民科学平台的数据如何受到这次致命的全球大流行病的影响。为了了解印度大流行年份的 eBird 数据是否与邻近年份的数据具有可比性,我们探索了数据的几个特征,例如人们在多个空间和时间尺度上集体或在公共地点观察鸟类的频率。我们发现,与 2019 年相比,2020-2021 年期间产生的数据量有所增加。数据特征主要仅在与高死亡率和严格封锁相关的大流行高峰期(2020 年 4 月至 5 月和 2021 年 4 月至 5 月)发生变化。这些数据特征的变化(例如,对地点的忠诚度更高,群体观鸟更少)可能是由于这些时期人类的流动性和社会交往减少所致。这些限制年的其余年份的数据仍与相邻年份的数据相似,从而减少了异常高峰月对任何年度推断的影响。我们的研究结果表明,作为公民科学的贡献者,印度的观鸟者很快就恢复到了疫情前的行为,而且疫情对观鸟努力和观鸟行为的影响是规模和环境依赖性的。总之,印度大流行时期的 eBird 数据对于丰度趋势估计和类似的大规模应用仍然有用,但在精细规模上使用时,初步的数据质量检查将使其受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Despite short-lived changes, COVID-19 pandemic had minimal large-scale impact on citizen science participation in India
Many parts of the world lack the large and coordinated volunteer networks required for systematic monitoring of bird populations. In these regions, citizen science programs offer an alternative with their semi-structured data, but the utility of these data is contingent on how, where, and how comparably birdwatchers watch birds, year on year. Trends inferred from the data can be confounded during years when birdwatchers may behave differently, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic. We wanted to ascertain how the data uploaded from India to one such citizen science platform, eBird, were impacted by this deadly global pandemic. To understand whether eBird data from the pandemic years in India are comparable to data from adjacent years, we explored several characteristics of the data, such as how often people watched birds in groups or at public locations, at multiple spatial and temporal scales. We found that the volume of data generated increased during the pandemic years 2020–2021 compared to 2019. Data characteristics changed largely only during the peak pandemic months (April–May 2020 and April–May 2021) associated with high fatality rates and strict lockdowns. These changes in data characteristics (e.g., greater site fidelity and less group birding) were possibly due to the decreased human mobility and social interaction in these periods. The data from the remainder of these restrictive years remained similar to those of the adjacent years, thereby reducing the impact of the aberrant peak months on any annual inference. Our findings show that birdwatchers in India as contributors to citizen science rapidly returned to their pre-pandemic behavior, and that the effects of the pandemic on birdwatching effort and birdwatcher behavior are scale- and context-dependent. In summary, eBird data from the pandemic years in India remain useful for abundance trend estimation and similar large-scale applications, but will benefit from preliminary data quality checks when utilized at a fine scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cellular network measurements can unravel spatiotemporal properties of bird movement to enhance basic and applied knowledge globally Cellular network measurements can unravel spatiotemporal properties of bird movement to enhance basic and applied knowledge globally The Amazon Basin’s rivers and lakes support Nearctic-breeding shorebirds during southward migration Two listeners detect slightly more birds than a single listener when interpreting acoustic recordings Despite short-lived changes, COVID-19 pandemic had minimal large-scale impact on citizen science participation in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1