根管治疗中各种灌洗方案的比较分析

IF 0.8 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_276_24
M. Mirza, Kirti Sharma, Chitharanjan Shetty, Jayantika Gupta, Kinjal Padariya, Hitesh Chohan, Alen Pius
{"title":"根管治疗中各种灌洗方案的比较分析","authors":"M. Mirza, Kirti Sharma, Chitharanjan Shetty, Jayantika Gupta, Kinjal Padariya, Hitesh Chohan, Alen Pius","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_276_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n “Root canal treatment (RCT)” is essential in preserving natural dentition by eliminating infection within the root canal system. Irrigation solutions play a crucial role in achieving successful RCT outcomes by facilitating disinfection and debris removal.\n \n \n \n An in vitro experimental design was employed to evaluate the irrigation solutions. Antimicrobial efficacy was assessed using agar diffusion assays against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. Tissue dissolution ability was evaluated by measuring the weight loss of dentin specimens. Cytotoxicity was assessed using cell viability assays with human periodontal ligament fibroblasts.\n \n \n \n NaOCl demonstrated the highest antimicrobial efficacy, while EDTA exhibited superior tissue dissolution ability. CHX and QMix displayed lower cytotoxicity compared to NaOCl and EDTA.\n \n \n \n The choice of irrigation solution in RCT should consider factors such as antimicrobial efficacy, tissue dissolution ability, and cytotoxicity. NaOCl remains effective but has high cytotoxicity, whereas CHX and QMix offer alternatives with lower cytotoxicity. EDTA is effective in tissue dissolution but should be used cautiously due to cytotoxic potential. Clinicians should weigh the benefits and limitations of each solution for optimal treatment outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":16824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Various Irrigation Solutions in Root Canal Treatment\",\"authors\":\"M. Mirza, Kirti Sharma, Chitharanjan Shetty, Jayantika Gupta, Kinjal Padariya, Hitesh Chohan, Alen Pius\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_276_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n \\n \\n \\n “Root canal treatment (RCT)” is essential in preserving natural dentition by eliminating infection within the root canal system. Irrigation solutions play a crucial role in achieving successful RCT outcomes by facilitating disinfection and debris removal.\\n \\n \\n \\n An in vitro experimental design was employed to evaluate the irrigation solutions. Antimicrobial efficacy was assessed using agar diffusion assays against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. Tissue dissolution ability was evaluated by measuring the weight loss of dentin specimens. Cytotoxicity was assessed using cell viability assays with human periodontal ligament fibroblasts.\\n \\n \\n \\n NaOCl demonstrated the highest antimicrobial efficacy, while EDTA exhibited superior tissue dissolution ability. CHX and QMix displayed lower cytotoxicity compared to NaOCl and EDTA.\\n \\n \\n \\n The choice of irrigation solution in RCT should consider factors such as antimicrobial efficacy, tissue dissolution ability, and cytotoxicity. NaOCl remains effective but has high cytotoxicity, whereas CHX and QMix offer alternatives with lower cytotoxicity. EDTA is effective in tissue dissolution but should be used cautiously due to cytotoxic potential. Clinicians should weigh the benefits and limitations of each solution for optimal treatment outcomes.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_276_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_276_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 "根管治疗(RCT)"对于通过消除根管系统内的感染来保护天然牙至关重要。冲洗溶液可促进消毒和碎屑清除,对成功实现 RCT 起着至关重要的作用。 我们采用了体外实验设计来评估冲洗液。使用琼脂扩散试验评估了对粪肠球菌和白色念珠菌的抗菌效果。组织溶解能力是通过测量牙本质样本的重量损失来评估的。细胞毒性是通过使用人类牙周韧带成纤维细胞进行细胞活力测定来评估的。 结果表明,NaOCl 的抗菌效力最高,而 EDTA 的组织溶解能力更强。与 NaOCl 和 EDTA 相比,CHX 和 QMix 的细胞毒性较低。 RCT 冲洗液的选择应考虑抗菌效果、组织溶解能力和细胞毒性等因素。NaOCl 仍然有效,但细胞毒性较高,而 CHX 和 QMix 则是细胞毒性较低的替代品。乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)能有效溶解组织,但由于具有潜在的细胞毒性,应谨慎使用。临床医生应权衡每种溶液的优点和局限性,以获得最佳治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Various Irrigation Solutions in Root Canal Treatment
ABSTRACT “Root canal treatment (RCT)” is essential in preserving natural dentition by eliminating infection within the root canal system. Irrigation solutions play a crucial role in achieving successful RCT outcomes by facilitating disinfection and debris removal. An in vitro experimental design was employed to evaluate the irrigation solutions. Antimicrobial efficacy was assessed using agar diffusion assays against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. Tissue dissolution ability was evaluated by measuring the weight loss of dentin specimens. Cytotoxicity was assessed using cell viability assays with human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. NaOCl demonstrated the highest antimicrobial efficacy, while EDTA exhibited superior tissue dissolution ability. CHX and QMix displayed lower cytotoxicity compared to NaOCl and EDTA. The choice of irrigation solution in RCT should consider factors such as antimicrobial efficacy, tissue dissolution ability, and cytotoxicity. NaOCl remains effective but has high cytotoxicity, whereas CHX and QMix offer alternatives with lower cytotoxicity. EDTA is effective in tissue dissolution but should be used cautiously due to cytotoxic potential. Clinicians should weigh the benefits and limitations of each solution for optimal treatment outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is a Quarterly multidisciplinary open access biomedical journal. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is an international medium of interaction between scientist, academicians and industrial personnel’s.JPBS is now offial publication of OPUBS.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Tele-Orthodontics in Enhancing Patient Compliance and Treatment Monitoring Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation in Dry Eye Syndrome: An In vitro Investigation Enhancing Precision in Endodontic Procedures: An In vitro Investigation of Magnification and Enhanced Visualization Comparative Evaluation of Surgical Techniques for Pterygium Management: An In Vitro Study Schoolchildren’s Musculoskeletal Pain and Backpack Weight Impact on Posture: A Short-Term Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1