用 Rasch 模型分析高中生物学科批判性思维和创造性问题的质量

Tasya Novian Indah Sari, Anna Rakhmawati
{"title":"用 Rasch 模型分析高中生物学科批判性思维和创造性问题的质量","authors":"Tasya Novian Indah Sari, Anna Rakhmawati","doi":"10.22219/raden.v4i1.32758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A good instrument is an instrument that can measure students' abilities accurately. The research aims to analyze the quality of critical thinking and creativity items on water pollution material in terms of validity, reliability, and level of difficulty using the Rasch model. The research used a quantitative descriptive method involving biology learning experts and 173 class X high school students. The research was carried out in December 2023-January 2024. The data collection method used expert assessment sheets and critical thinking and creativity essay questions. Data were analyzed using the Rasch model assisted by Quest. The results showed that of the 10 critical thinking essay questions, 3 questions were invalid, while of the 8 creativity essay questions, 1 question was invalid based on the suitability of the INFIT MNSQ and OUTFIT T scores. The results of the reliability test with Cronbach’s alpha showed that the reliability value of the critical thinking instrument was 0.74 and creativity 0.79. Average difficulty level of questions with threshold values in the medium and difficult categories. Overall, the instrument was feasible and question items that did not fit the Rasch model were removed.","PeriodicalId":355944,"journal":{"name":"Research and Development in Education (RaDEn)","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis the quality of critical thinking and creativity questions in high school biology subjects with the Rasch model\",\"authors\":\"Tasya Novian Indah Sari, Anna Rakhmawati\",\"doi\":\"10.22219/raden.v4i1.32758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A good instrument is an instrument that can measure students' abilities accurately. The research aims to analyze the quality of critical thinking and creativity items on water pollution material in terms of validity, reliability, and level of difficulty using the Rasch model. The research used a quantitative descriptive method involving biology learning experts and 173 class X high school students. The research was carried out in December 2023-January 2024. The data collection method used expert assessment sheets and critical thinking and creativity essay questions. Data were analyzed using the Rasch model assisted by Quest. The results showed that of the 10 critical thinking essay questions, 3 questions were invalid, while of the 8 creativity essay questions, 1 question was invalid based on the suitability of the INFIT MNSQ and OUTFIT T scores. The results of the reliability test with Cronbach’s alpha showed that the reliability value of the critical thinking instrument was 0.74 and creativity 0.79. Average difficulty level of questions with threshold values in the medium and difficult categories. Overall, the instrument was feasible and question items that did not fit the Rasch model were removed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Development in Education (RaDEn)\",\"volume\":\"18 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Development in Education (RaDEn)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.32758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Development in Education (RaDEn)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.32758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个好的工具是能够准确测量学生能力的工具。本研究旨在利用 Rasch 模型,从效度、信度和难度三个方面分析水污染材料中批判性思维和创造力项目的质量。研究采用定量描述法,涉及生物学习专家和 173 名高中 X 级学生。研究于 2023 年 12 月至 2024 年 1 月进行。数据收集方法使用了专家评估表和批判性思维与创造性论文问题。数据分析采用 Quest 辅助的 Rasch 模型。结果显示,根据 INFIT MNSQ 和 OUTFIT T 分数的适宜性,10 道批判性思维论文题中有 3 道题无效,8 道创造性论文题中有 1 道题无效。用 Cronbach's alpha 进行的信度检验结果显示,批判性思维工具的信度值为 0.74,创造力工具的信度值为 0.79。问题的平均难度为中等和较难,临界值为中等和较难。总体而言,该工具是可行的,不符合 Rasch 模型的问题项目已被删除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis the quality of critical thinking and creativity questions in high school biology subjects with the Rasch model
A good instrument is an instrument that can measure students' abilities accurately. The research aims to analyze the quality of critical thinking and creativity items on water pollution material in terms of validity, reliability, and level of difficulty using the Rasch model. The research used a quantitative descriptive method involving biology learning experts and 173 class X high school students. The research was carried out in December 2023-January 2024. The data collection method used expert assessment sheets and critical thinking and creativity essay questions. Data were analyzed using the Rasch model assisted by Quest. The results showed that of the 10 critical thinking essay questions, 3 questions were invalid, while of the 8 creativity essay questions, 1 question was invalid based on the suitability of the INFIT MNSQ and OUTFIT T scores. The results of the reliability test with Cronbach’s alpha showed that the reliability value of the critical thinking instrument was 0.74 and creativity 0.79. Average difficulty level of questions with threshold values in the medium and difficult categories. Overall, the instrument was feasible and question items that did not fit the Rasch model were removed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Students' perceptions of the vermicompost as a potential contextual learning resources Augmented reality in biology education: A systematic literature review Interactive learning media: Literacy and numeracy Limas House Balaputera Dewa Museum in phase B Analysis the quality of critical thinking and creativity questions in high school biology subjects with the Rasch model Exploring the “Can Do” and “Will Do” factors of human capital to enhance university performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1