斯里兰卡科伦坡里奇韦夫人儿童医院家长对儿科基本生命支持的了解和认识

Hasitha Madusanka Dilruk Madura Arachchige
{"title":"斯里兰卡科伦坡里奇韦夫人儿童医院家长对儿科基本生命支持的了解和认识","authors":"Hasitha Madusanka Dilruk Madura Arachchige","doi":"10.4038/sljch.v53i2.10786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children is uncommon but significant, with poor survival rates and high morbidity. Choking in children is common but less reported with high mortality.  Early commencement of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in cardiac arrest or following of choking algorithm in a case of choking is important for survival of the victim.  Objectives: To survey the knowledge, awareness and attitudes of parents in Sri Lanka regarding paediatric Basic Life Support (BLS) including early treatment of choking.Method: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study and questionnaires were administered to parents of children managed at the Preliminary Care Unit (PCU) and wards 2 and 4 of Lady Ridgeway Hospital, Colombo from October 2022 to January 2023. Sample size was calculated according to the Lwanga and Lemeshow method. Total respondents were 350 out of total participants of 415. The questionnaire consisted of four sections for assessment of demography, knowledge and attitude. Total scores of each aspect were analysed with respect to different factors.Results: Of the participants, 95% did not have BLS training and the largest proportion of them was educated only up to the General Certificate of Education (GCE) ordinary level. Knowledge of specific aspects of BLS or choking was demonstrated by only about 10% of the population. Nearly 50% of parents had identified substandard common practices as correct methods. There was no statistically significant correlation between total score of each aspect and previous observations, training or highest educational level. It was assessed with 95% confidence interval. However, seeing BLS had improved knowledge of basic health (p=0.013).  Conclusions: Seeing the procedure on television or other resources had not improved knowledge of BLS. Workshops were the preferred method to improve their knowledge on BLS including the choking algorithm and participants’ educational level was not important in organizing such an event.","PeriodicalId":38870,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and awareness of paediatric basic life support among parents in the Lady Ridgeway Hospital for Children, Colombo, Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"Hasitha Madusanka Dilruk Madura Arachchige\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/sljch.v53i2.10786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children is uncommon but significant, with poor survival rates and high morbidity. Choking in children is common but less reported with high mortality.  Early commencement of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in cardiac arrest or following of choking algorithm in a case of choking is important for survival of the victim.  Objectives: To survey the knowledge, awareness and attitudes of parents in Sri Lanka regarding paediatric Basic Life Support (BLS) including early treatment of choking.Method: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study and questionnaires were administered to parents of children managed at the Preliminary Care Unit (PCU) and wards 2 and 4 of Lady Ridgeway Hospital, Colombo from October 2022 to January 2023. Sample size was calculated according to the Lwanga and Lemeshow method. Total respondents were 350 out of total participants of 415. The questionnaire consisted of four sections for assessment of demography, knowledge and attitude. Total scores of each aspect were analysed with respect to different factors.Results: Of the participants, 95% did not have BLS training and the largest proportion of them was educated only up to the General Certificate of Education (GCE) ordinary level. Knowledge of specific aspects of BLS or choking was demonstrated by only about 10% of the population. Nearly 50% of parents had identified substandard common practices as correct methods. There was no statistically significant correlation between total score of each aspect and previous observations, training or highest educational level. It was assessed with 95% confidence interval. However, seeing BLS had improved knowledge of basic health (p=0.013).  Conclusions: Seeing the procedure on television or other resources had not improved knowledge of BLS. Workshops were the preferred method to improve their knowledge on BLS including the choking algorithm and participants’ educational level was not important in organizing such an event.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljch.v53i2.10786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljch.v53i2.10786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童院外心脏骤停并不常见,但意义重大,存活率低且发病率高。儿童窒息很常见,但报道较少,死亡率高。 在心脏骤停时及早开始心肺复苏(CPR)或在发生窒息时遵循窒息急救法对患者的存活非常重要。 调查目的调查斯里兰卡家长对儿科基本生命支持(BLS)包括窒息早期治疗的知识、认识和态度:这是一项描述性横断面研究,于 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 1 月期间对科伦坡里奇韦夫人医院初步护理部(PCU)、2 号病房和 4 号病房的患儿家长进行了问卷调查。样本量根据 Lwanga 和 Lemeshow 方法计算。在 415 名参与者中,共有 350 名受访者。问卷由四个部分组成,用于评估人口统计学、知识和态度。根据不同因素对各方面的总分进行了分析:在参与者中,95% 的人没有接受过 BLS 培训,其中最大一部分人的教育程度仅达到普通教育证书(GCE)的普通水平。只有约 10%的人对 BLS 或窒息的具体方面有所了解。近 50%的家长认为不合格的普通做法是正确的方法。各方面的总分与以往的观察、培训或最高教育水平之间没有统计学意义上的相关性。评估的置信区间为 95%。不过,看过 BLS 可提高基本保健知识(p=0.013)。 结论从电视或其他资源上看到该程序并没有提高对 BLS 的了解。研讨会是提高包括窒息算法在内的 BLS 知识的首选方法,而参与者的教育水平在组织此类活动时并不重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge and awareness of paediatric basic life support among parents in the Lady Ridgeway Hospital for Children, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children is uncommon but significant, with poor survival rates and high morbidity. Choking in children is common but less reported with high mortality.  Early commencement of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in cardiac arrest or following of choking algorithm in a case of choking is important for survival of the victim.  Objectives: To survey the knowledge, awareness and attitudes of parents in Sri Lanka regarding paediatric Basic Life Support (BLS) including early treatment of choking.Method: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study and questionnaires were administered to parents of children managed at the Preliminary Care Unit (PCU) and wards 2 and 4 of Lady Ridgeway Hospital, Colombo from October 2022 to January 2023. Sample size was calculated according to the Lwanga and Lemeshow method. Total respondents were 350 out of total participants of 415. The questionnaire consisted of four sections for assessment of demography, knowledge and attitude. Total scores of each aspect were analysed with respect to different factors.Results: Of the participants, 95% did not have BLS training and the largest proportion of them was educated only up to the General Certificate of Education (GCE) ordinary level. Knowledge of specific aspects of BLS or choking was demonstrated by only about 10% of the population. Nearly 50% of parents had identified substandard common practices as correct methods. There was no statistically significant correlation between total score of each aspect and previous observations, training or highest educational level. It was assessed with 95% confidence interval. However, seeing BLS had improved knowledge of basic health (p=0.013).  Conclusions: Seeing the procedure on television or other resources had not improved knowledge of BLS. Workshops were the preferred method to improve their knowledge on BLS including the choking algorithm and participants’ educational level was not important in organizing such an event.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health
Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: This is the only journal of child health in Sri Lanka. It is designed to publish original research articles and scholarly articles by recognized authorities on paediatric subjects. It is distributed widely in Sri Lanka and bears the ISSN number 1391-5452 for the print issues and e-ISSN 2386-110x for the electronic version in the internet. The journal is published quarterly and the articles are reviewed by both local and foreign peers. The Journal is the primary organ of Continuing Paediatric Medical Education in Sri Lanka.
期刊最新文献
Intelligence quotient in children with congenital hypothyroidism on treatment: A cross-sectional study Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: A rare initial presentation of microscopic polyangiitis in a three-year-old girl Evaluation of the effectiveness of herbal and non-herbal oral formulations for the prevention of oral diseases in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis Paediatric liver transplantation in Sri Lanka; From an impossible dream to a lifesaving reality. The impact of the exodus of professionals on Sri Lankan Paediatric Healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1