期待什么?优化消费者-品牌关系规范的可操作性

Katerina Makri, D. Bourdin, Marc Herz
{"title":"期待什么?优化消费者-品牌关系规范的可操作性","authors":"Katerina Makri, D. Bourdin, Marc Herz","doi":"10.1002/mar.22049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumers relate to brands in ways analogous to how they relate with people. And, just as consumers have norms that guide their interpersonal relationships, they also have norms that guide their relationships with brands. While such relational norms are essential in determining brand value, extant literature offers no measure to effectively operationalize the framework that governs consumer–brand relationships. Preliminary work offers important insight but suffers from several methodological shortcomings, rendering subsequent empirical applications problematic and hindering theoretical and practical advancements. In seven studies (ntotal = 3121), we revisit seminal work on the consumer–brand relational norms construct to refine and validate its measurement. Our findings reveal a unidimensional set of items that display strong psychometric properties, offering a parsimonious measure that promotes consistent operationalizations of the construct across studies and enables comparison and integration of empirical results.","PeriodicalId":188459,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is to be expected? Optimizing the operationalization of consumer–brand relational norms\",\"authors\":\"Katerina Makri, D. Bourdin, Marc Herz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mar.22049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consumers relate to brands in ways analogous to how they relate with people. And, just as consumers have norms that guide their interpersonal relationships, they also have norms that guide their relationships with brands. While such relational norms are essential in determining brand value, extant literature offers no measure to effectively operationalize the framework that governs consumer–brand relationships. Preliminary work offers important insight but suffers from several methodological shortcomings, rendering subsequent empirical applications problematic and hindering theoretical and practical advancements. In seven studies (ntotal = 3121), we revisit seminal work on the consumer–brand relational norms construct to refine and validate its measurement. Our findings reveal a unidimensional set of items that display strong psychometric properties, offering a parsimonious measure that promotes consistent operationalizations of the construct across studies and enables comparison and integration of empirical results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology & Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology & Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

消费者与品牌的关系类似于他们与人的关系。正如消费者有指导其人际关系的规范一样,他们也有指导其与品牌关系的规范。虽然这种关系规范对决定品牌价值至关重要,但现有文献并没有提供有效操作消费者与品牌关系框架的措施。初步研究提供了重要的见解,但也存在一些方法上的缺陷,导致后续的实证应用存在问题,阻碍了理论和实践的进步。在七项研究(总计 = 3121)中,我们重新审视了有关消费者-品牌关系规范构建的开创性工作,以完善和验证其测量方法。我们的研究结果表明,一组单维度的项目显示出很强的心理测量特性,提供了一个简明的测量方法,促进了不同研究中对这一概念的一致操作,并实现了经验结果的比较和整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is to be expected? Optimizing the operationalization of consumer–brand relational norms
Consumers relate to brands in ways analogous to how they relate with people. And, just as consumers have norms that guide their interpersonal relationships, they also have norms that guide their relationships with brands. While such relational norms are essential in determining brand value, extant literature offers no measure to effectively operationalize the framework that governs consumer–brand relationships. Preliminary work offers important insight but suffers from several methodological shortcomings, rendering subsequent empirical applications problematic and hindering theoretical and practical advancements. In seven studies (ntotal = 3121), we revisit seminal work on the consumer–brand relational norms construct to refine and validate its measurement. Our findings reveal a unidimensional set of items that display strong psychometric properties, offering a parsimonious measure that promotes consistent operationalizations of the construct across studies and enables comparison and integration of empirical results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The double‐edged sword of generative artificial intelligence in digitalization: An affordances and constraints perspective Social comparison theory: A review and future directions The double‐edged sword of generative artificial intelligence in digitalization: An affordances and constraints perspective Social comparison theory: A review and future directions Bayesian inference and consumer behavioral theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1