关于胸腹动脉瘤栅栏式和分支式血管内修复术早期、中期和长期疗效的非系统性综述。

{"title":"关于胸腹动脉瘤栅栏式和分支式血管内修复术早期、中期和长期疗效的非系统性综述。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Over the last two decades, the development of fenestrated and branched aortic endografts (F/BEVAR) has enabled endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) in high surgical risk patients. F/BEVAR has demonstrated acceptable early and mid-term outcomes; however, challenges include bridging stent instability and a high rate of reinterventions. Evaluating the long-term outcomes and durability of F/BEVAR is important for broader application of this technology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a comprehensive, nonsystematic review of the literature reporting on the early, mid-term, and earl-long term outcomes for branched and fenestrated endovascular repair of TAAAs. The authors achieved consensus on the studies reviewed. Studies were evaluated based on the type and extent of aneurysms treated, long-term mortality, reintervention, and branch graft instability, although no pooled data analysis was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Retrospective cohort studies have reported a short-term mortality benefit for F/BEVAR in anatomically suitable high surgical risk patients. In the studies reviewed, the overall survival rate after FEVAR ranged from 81% to 100% at 1 year, 32% to 76% at 5 years, and 33% to 52% at 7 years. Freedom from reintervention after FEVAR ranged from 38% to 91% at 3 years and 50%% to 80% at 5 years. Bridging stent graft instability resulting in endoleak remain a significant clinical challenge and a primary driver of reintervention. Reports of target vessel patency ranged 89% to 96% at 3 years, and 86% to 99% at 5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TAAAs present a challenging pathology associated with significant morbidity and mortality after surgical repair. Fenestrated and branched endovascular repair has enabled minimally invasive repair in high surgical risk patients and has demonstrated acceptable short- and mid-term outcomes including an early survival benefit, and a low rate of aortic-related mortality. F/BEVAR has also been associated with a higher rate of long-term reinterventions. Main body endoleak from progressive degeneration and branch graft instability have emerged as the primary drivers of long-term reinterventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74034,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000588/pdfft?md5=221f339d388ffabba0bf1aa61c1991d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2949912724000588-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A nonsystematic review of the early, mid-term, and long-term outcomes for fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Over the last two decades, the development of fenestrated and branched aortic endografts (F/BEVAR) has enabled endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) in high surgical risk patients. F/BEVAR has demonstrated acceptable early and mid-term outcomes; however, challenges include bridging stent instability and a high rate of reinterventions. Evaluating the long-term outcomes and durability of F/BEVAR is important for broader application of this technology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a comprehensive, nonsystematic review of the literature reporting on the early, mid-term, and earl-long term outcomes for branched and fenestrated endovascular repair of TAAAs. The authors achieved consensus on the studies reviewed. Studies were evaluated based on the type and extent of aneurysms treated, long-term mortality, reintervention, and branch graft instability, although no pooled data analysis was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Retrospective cohort studies have reported a short-term mortality benefit for F/BEVAR in anatomically suitable high surgical risk patients. In the studies reviewed, the overall survival rate after FEVAR ranged from 81% to 100% at 1 year, 32% to 76% at 5 years, and 33% to 52% at 7 years. Freedom from reintervention after FEVAR ranged from 38% to 91% at 3 years and 50%% to 80% at 5 years. Bridging stent graft instability resulting in endoleak remain a significant clinical challenge and a primary driver of reintervention. Reports of target vessel patency ranged 89% to 96% at 3 years, and 86% to 99% at 5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TAAAs present a challenging pathology associated with significant morbidity and mortality after surgical repair. Fenestrated and branched endovascular repair has enabled minimally invasive repair in high surgical risk patients and has demonstrated acceptable short- and mid-term outcomes including an early survival benefit, and a low rate of aortic-related mortality. F/BEVAR has also been associated with a higher rate of long-term reinterventions. Main body endoleak from progressive degeneration and branch graft instability have emerged as the primary drivers of long-term reinterventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JVS-vascular insights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000588/pdfft?md5=221f339d388ffabba0bf1aa61c1991d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2949912724000588-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JVS-vascular insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在过去的二十年里,主动脉内支架(F/BEVAR)的发展使得高手术风险患者的胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)的血管内修复成为可能。F/BEVAR 的早期和中期疗效均可接受,但面临的挑战包括桥接支架不稳定和再介入率高。评估 F/BEVAR 的长期疗效和耐久性对更广泛地应用该技术非常重要。方法我们对报道 TAAAs 支架和瘘管内血管修复术早期、中期和近期疗效的文献进行了全面的非系统性综述。作者们对所回顾的研究达成了共识。虽然没有进行汇总数据分析,但根据所治疗动脉瘤的类型和范围、长期死亡率、再次手术和分支移植物不稳定性对研究进行了评估。在回顾性研究中,FEVAR 术后 1 年的总生存率从 81% 到 100% 不等,5 年的总生存率从 32% 到 76% 不等,7 年的总生存率从 33% 到 52% 不等。FEVAR 术后 3 年的再介入率为 38% 至 91%,5 年的再介入率为 50% 至 80%。桥接支架移植物不稳定导致内漏仍然是一个重大的临床挑战,也是再介入的主要原因。3年后靶血管通畅率为89%至96%,5年后为86%至99%。开孔和分支血管内修复术实现了高手术风险患者的微创修复,并取得了可接受的短期和中期疗效,包括早期生存获益和较低的主动脉相关死亡率。F/BEVAR 也与较高的长期再介入率有关。渐进性退化造成的主体内漏和分支移植物的不稳定性已成为长期再介入的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A nonsystematic review of the early, mid-term, and long-term outcomes for fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms

Background

Over the last two decades, the development of fenestrated and branched aortic endografts (F/BEVAR) has enabled endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) in high surgical risk patients. F/BEVAR has demonstrated acceptable early and mid-term outcomes; however, challenges include bridging stent instability and a high rate of reinterventions. Evaluating the long-term outcomes and durability of F/BEVAR is important for broader application of this technology.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive, nonsystematic review of the literature reporting on the early, mid-term, and earl-long term outcomes for branched and fenestrated endovascular repair of TAAAs. The authors achieved consensus on the studies reviewed. Studies were evaluated based on the type and extent of aneurysms treated, long-term mortality, reintervention, and branch graft instability, although no pooled data analysis was performed.

Results

Retrospective cohort studies have reported a short-term mortality benefit for F/BEVAR in anatomically suitable high surgical risk patients. In the studies reviewed, the overall survival rate after FEVAR ranged from 81% to 100% at 1 year, 32% to 76% at 5 years, and 33% to 52% at 7 years. Freedom from reintervention after FEVAR ranged from 38% to 91% at 3 years and 50%% to 80% at 5 years. Bridging stent graft instability resulting in endoleak remain a significant clinical challenge and a primary driver of reintervention. Reports of target vessel patency ranged 89% to 96% at 3 years, and 86% to 99% at 5 years.

Conclusions

TAAAs present a challenging pathology associated with significant morbidity and mortality after surgical repair. Fenestrated and branched endovascular repair has enabled minimally invasive repair in high surgical risk patients and has demonstrated acceptable short- and mid-term outcomes including an early survival benefit, and a low rate of aortic-related mortality. F/BEVAR has also been associated with a higher rate of long-term reinterventions. Main body endoleak from progressive degeneration and branch graft instability have emerged as the primary drivers of long-term reinterventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regarding “Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion from SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS” An Assessment of Racial Diversity in Vascular Surgery Educational Resources The use of artificial intelligence in three-dimensional imaging modalities and diabetic foot disease – a systematic review Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1