基于免疫疗法的联合疗法后的残余疾病治疗对转移性肾细胞癌患者完全缓解率的影响

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical genitourinary cancer Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102134
F. Moinard-Butot , M. Oriel , T. Tricard , RL. Cazzato , L. Pierard , V. Gaillard , P. Werle , V. Lindner , S. Martin , C. Schuster , C. Roy , M. Burgy , A. Anthony , C. Bigot , P. Boudier , A. Fritsch , A. Olland , G. Malouf , H. Lang , P. Barthélémy
{"title":"基于免疫疗法的联合疗法后的残余疾病治疗对转移性肾细胞癌患者完全缓解率的影响","authors":"F. Moinard-Butot ,&nbsp;M. Oriel ,&nbsp;T. Tricard ,&nbsp;RL. Cazzato ,&nbsp;L. Pierard ,&nbsp;V. Gaillard ,&nbsp;P. Werle ,&nbsp;V. Lindner ,&nbsp;S. Martin ,&nbsp;C. Schuster ,&nbsp;C. Roy ,&nbsp;M. Burgy ,&nbsp;A. Anthony ,&nbsp;C. Bigot ,&nbsp;P. Boudier ,&nbsp;A. Fritsch ,&nbsp;A. Olland ,&nbsp;G. Malouf ,&nbsp;H. Lang ,&nbsp;P. Barthélémy","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations have revolutionized the management of first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by improving patient survival. Large phase 3 randomized trials assessing ICI-based combinations have reported complete response (CR) rates of 10% to 18% in the first-line setting. However, there is a scarcity of data about the effect of treatment of residual disease regarding CR rates improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>We included retrospectively all consecutive mRCC patients treated in first-line setting at the Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe with an ICI-based combination involving ICI or TKI, either alone or with added local treatment of residual disease. Patients were characterized according to IMDC risk. Radiologic response was defined according to RECIST v1.1.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We enrolled 80 mRCC patients treated with ICI-based combinations between May 2015 and May 2022. The median age was 63 years. Regarding IMDC risk, there were 12 favourable (15%), 50 intermediate (63%), and 18 poor-risk (22%) patients. Forty-seven patients (59%) received ICI + ICI, 24 (30%) received ICI + TKI, and 9 (11%) received another ICI-based therapy. In total, 8 achieved CR (10%), 36 patients (45%) achieved partial response, 23 (29%) achieved stable disease and 12 achieved progressive disease (15%) as the best response with systemic therapy alone. By adding local treatment of residual disease, 11 additional patients (14%) <em>achieved radiological NED.</em> Residual disease resected sites included kidney (n = 6), lymph nodes (n = 5), lung metastases (n = 2) and liver metastases (n = 1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The resection of residual disease after first-line ICI-based therapy is associated with improved CR rate <em>(CR + NED)</em> in patients with mRCC. These results need to be validated in prospective trial.</p></div><div><h3>Patient Summary</h3><p>In recent years, the advent of immunotherapy has radically changed the management of patients with metastatic kidney cancer. Approximately 10% to 18% of these patients using immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations no longer have detectable disease on CT scans (complete response). There are currently few data on the use of treatment of residual disease to increase the number of patients in complete response. In this retrospective study, the complete response rate with ICI-based treatment was 10%. When local treatment was added, the number of patients with a complete response increased to 24%. This strategy could increase the number of patients with a prolonged complete response in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001058/pdfft?md5=4dc178a26fb815b014f86daf58a64f25&pid=1-s2.0-S1558767324001058-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Treatment of Residual Disease After Immunotherapy-Based Combinations on Complete Response Rate of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinomas\",\"authors\":\"F. Moinard-Butot ,&nbsp;M. Oriel ,&nbsp;T. Tricard ,&nbsp;RL. Cazzato ,&nbsp;L. Pierard ,&nbsp;V. Gaillard ,&nbsp;P. Werle ,&nbsp;V. Lindner ,&nbsp;S. Martin ,&nbsp;C. Schuster ,&nbsp;C. Roy ,&nbsp;M. Burgy ,&nbsp;A. Anthony ,&nbsp;C. Bigot ,&nbsp;P. Boudier ,&nbsp;A. Fritsch ,&nbsp;A. Olland ,&nbsp;G. Malouf ,&nbsp;H. Lang ,&nbsp;P. Barthélémy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations have revolutionized the management of first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by improving patient survival. Large phase 3 randomized trials assessing ICI-based combinations have reported complete response (CR) rates of 10% to 18% in the first-line setting. However, there is a scarcity of data about the effect of treatment of residual disease regarding CR rates improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>We included retrospectively all consecutive mRCC patients treated in first-line setting at the Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe with an ICI-based combination involving ICI or TKI, either alone or with added local treatment of residual disease. Patients were characterized according to IMDC risk. Radiologic response was defined according to RECIST v1.1.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We enrolled 80 mRCC patients treated with ICI-based combinations between May 2015 and May 2022. The median age was 63 years. Regarding IMDC risk, there were 12 favourable (15%), 50 intermediate (63%), and 18 poor-risk (22%) patients. Forty-seven patients (59%) received ICI + ICI, 24 (30%) received ICI + TKI, and 9 (11%) received another ICI-based therapy. In total, 8 achieved CR (10%), 36 patients (45%) achieved partial response, 23 (29%) achieved stable disease and 12 achieved progressive disease (15%) as the best response with systemic therapy alone. By adding local treatment of residual disease, 11 additional patients (14%) <em>achieved radiological NED.</em> Residual disease resected sites included kidney (n = 6), lymph nodes (n = 5), lung metastases (n = 2) and liver metastases (n = 1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The resection of residual disease after first-line ICI-based therapy is associated with improved CR rate <em>(CR + NED)</em> in patients with mRCC. These results need to be validated in prospective trial.</p></div><div><h3>Patient Summary</h3><p>In recent years, the advent of immunotherapy has radically changed the management of patients with metastatic kidney cancer. Approximately 10% to 18% of these patients using immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations no longer have detectable disease on CT scans (complete response). There are currently few data on the use of treatment of residual disease to increase the number of patients in complete response. In this retrospective study, the complete response rate with ICI-based treatment was 10%. When local treatment was added, the number of patients with a complete response increased to 24%. This strategy could increase the number of patients with a prolonged complete response in the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical genitourinary cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001058/pdfft?md5=4dc178a26fb815b014f86daf58a64f25&pid=1-s2.0-S1558767324001058-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical genitourinary cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言以免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)为基础的联合疗法通过提高患者生存率彻底改变了一线转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的治疗。评估以 ICI 为基础的联合疗法的大型 3 期随机试验报告显示,一线治疗的完全缓解率 (CR) 为 10% 至 18%。材料与方法我们回顾性地纳入了欧洲斯特拉斯堡癌症研究所所有接受一线治疗的连续 mRCC 患者,这些患者均接受了 ICI 或 TKI 联合治疗,包括单独治疗或增加局部残留疾病治疗。根据 IMDC 风险对患者进行特征描述。结果我们在2015年5月至2022年5月期间招募了80名接受基于ICI的联合治疗的mRCC患者。中位年龄为 63 岁。就IMDC风险而言,有12名良好患者(15%)、50名中度风险患者(63%)和18名低度风险患者(22%)。47 名患者(59%)接受了 ICI + ICI 治疗,24 名患者(30%)接受了 ICI + TKI 治疗,9 名患者(11%)接受了另一种基于 ICI 的治疗。其中,8 名患者(10%)获得了 CR,36 名患者(45%)获得了部分应答,23 名患者(29%)获得了疾病稳定,12 名患者(15%)获得了疾病进展,这是单用全身疗法的最佳应答。通过对残留疾病进行局部治疗,又有11名患者(14%)实现了放射学上的NED。残留疾病切除部位包括肾脏(6例)、淋巴结(5例)、肺转移灶(2例)和肝转移灶(1例)。患者总结近年来,免疫疗法的出现从根本上改变了转移性肾癌患者的治疗方法。在使用基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的联合疗法的患者中,约有 10% 至 18% 的患者在 CT 扫描中不再有可检测到的疾病(完全反应)。目前,关于使用残留疾病治疗来增加完全应答患者人数的数据很少。在这项回顾性研究中,使用 ICI 治疗的完全应答率为 10%。在增加局部治疗后,完全应答的患者人数增加到 24%。这一策略可在未来增加长期完全应答的患者人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Treatment of Residual Disease After Immunotherapy-Based Combinations on Complete Response Rate of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinomas

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations have revolutionized the management of first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by improving patient survival. Large phase 3 randomized trials assessing ICI-based combinations have reported complete response (CR) rates of 10% to 18% in the first-line setting. However, there is a scarcity of data about the effect of treatment of residual disease regarding CR rates improvement.

Materials and Methods

We included retrospectively all consecutive mRCC patients treated in first-line setting at the Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe with an ICI-based combination involving ICI or TKI, either alone or with added local treatment of residual disease. Patients were characterized according to IMDC risk. Radiologic response was defined according to RECIST v1.1.

Results

We enrolled 80 mRCC patients treated with ICI-based combinations between May 2015 and May 2022. The median age was 63 years. Regarding IMDC risk, there were 12 favourable (15%), 50 intermediate (63%), and 18 poor-risk (22%) patients. Forty-seven patients (59%) received ICI + ICI, 24 (30%) received ICI + TKI, and 9 (11%) received another ICI-based therapy. In total, 8 achieved CR (10%), 36 patients (45%) achieved partial response, 23 (29%) achieved stable disease and 12 achieved progressive disease (15%) as the best response with systemic therapy alone. By adding local treatment of residual disease, 11 additional patients (14%) achieved radiological NED. Residual disease resected sites included kidney (n = 6), lymph nodes (n = 5), lung metastases (n = 2) and liver metastases (n = 1).

Conclusions

The resection of residual disease after first-line ICI-based therapy is associated with improved CR rate (CR + NED) in patients with mRCC. These results need to be validated in prospective trial.

Patient Summary

In recent years, the advent of immunotherapy has radically changed the management of patients with metastatic kidney cancer. Approximately 10% to 18% of these patients using immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations no longer have detectable disease on CT scans (complete response). There are currently few data on the use of treatment of residual disease to increase the number of patients in complete response. In this retrospective study, the complete response rate with ICI-based treatment was 10%. When local treatment was added, the number of patients with a complete response increased to 24%. This strategy could increase the number of patients with a prolonged complete response in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical genitourinary cancer
Clinical genitourinary cancer 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
201
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research in genitourinary cancers. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of genitourinary cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to genitourinary malignancies. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Survival Outcomes by Race Following Surgical Treatment for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Adverse Health Outcomes 3 Years after Radical Prostatectomy Compared with Men in the General Population: A Study from the Cancer Registry of Norway Outcomes of Radical Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Localized Renal Pelvic and Ureteral Carcinoma Intolerant to Surgery: A Real-World Study Roles of Long Noncoding RNA in Prostate Cancer Pathogenesis Markers in Identifying Pathological Complete Response Status in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Who Achieved Clinical Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1