局部晚期口腔癌术后放疗联合或不联合化疗的疗效:系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ajoms.2024.06.001
Hu Longfei, Zhou Shangyin, Zhang Ju
{"title":"局部晚期口腔癌术后放疗联合或不联合化疗的疗效:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Hu Longfei,&nbsp;Zhou Shangyin,&nbsp;Zhang Ju","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoms.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone is an important treatment for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. We performed a meta-analysis of published reports about these two treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed an extensive exploration of various databases, such as Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. The study included research on the comparison between postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for oral cancer, with a restriction on the search language to English. The included endpoints consisted of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen studies were included, including 3 prospective studies and 13 retrospective studies, with 3364 patients. For patients with locally advanced oral cancer, compared with PORT, POCRT had better DFS (HR 0.64; 95 % confidence interval [CI],0.48–0.84; P = 0.001), OS (HR 0.76;95 %CI 0.65–0.89; P = 0.0005), and LRC (HR 0.65;95 %CI 0.44–0.95; P = 0.02). There was a tendency for DMFS (RR 0.95;95 %CI 0.90–1.01; P = 0.09) to exhibit a marginal statistical distinction. The risks of grade 3 or higher acute toxicity, such as oral mucositis (RR 1.36; p = 0.44), dysphagia (RR 1.57; p = 0.13), and severe skin (RR 0.71; p = 0.17), were more frequent in the POCRT group, but the difference was not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>For patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma, POCRT is beneficial in terms of DFS, OS, and LRC, but there is no significant benefit in DMFS. The group receiving POCRT exhibited a slightly increased likelihood of experiencing oral mucositis and dysphagia, although the disparity did not attain statistical significance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology","volume":"37 1","pages":"Pages 141-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy combined with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced oral cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hu Longfei,&nbsp;Zhou Shangyin,&nbsp;Zhang Ju\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoms.2024.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone is an important treatment for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. We performed a meta-analysis of published reports about these two treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed an extensive exploration of various databases, such as Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. The study included research on the comparison between postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for oral cancer, with a restriction on the search language to English. The included endpoints consisted of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen studies were included, including 3 prospective studies and 13 retrospective studies, with 3364 patients. For patients with locally advanced oral cancer, compared with PORT, POCRT had better DFS (HR 0.64; 95 % confidence interval [CI],0.48–0.84; P = 0.001), OS (HR 0.76;95 %CI 0.65–0.89; P = 0.0005), and LRC (HR 0.65;95 %CI 0.44–0.95; P = 0.02). There was a tendency for DMFS (RR 0.95;95 %CI 0.90–1.01; P = 0.09) to exhibit a marginal statistical distinction. The risks of grade 3 or higher acute toxicity, such as oral mucositis (RR 1.36; p = 0.44), dysphagia (RR 1.57; p = 0.13), and severe skin (RR 0.71; p = 0.17), were more frequent in the POCRT group, but the difference was not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>For patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma, POCRT is beneficial in terms of DFS, OS, and LRC, but there is no significant benefit in DMFS. The group receiving POCRT exhibited a slightly increased likelihood of experiencing oral mucositis and dysphagia, although the disparity did not attain statistical significance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 141-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212555824001066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212555824001066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的放疗联合化疗或单独放疗是治疗局部晚期口腔鳞状细胞癌的重要方法。我们对已发表的有关这两种治疗方法的报告进行了荟萃分析。方法我们对Embase、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆等各种数据库进行了广泛的检索。研究包括口腔癌术后化学放疗(POCRT)和术后放疗(PORT)的比较研究,搜索语言仅限于英语。纳入的终点包括无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)、局部区域控制(LRC)和无远处转移生存期(DMFS)。结果共纳入 16 项研究,包括 3 项前瞻性研究和 13 项回顾性研究,共 3364 名患者。对于局部晚期口腔癌患者,与 PORT 相比,POCRT 的 DFS(HR 0.64;95 % 置信区间 [CI],0.48-0.84;P = 0.001)、OS(HR 0.76;95 %CI 0.65-0.89;P = 0.0005)和 LRC(HR 0.65;95 %CI 0.44-0.95;P = 0.02)更好。DMFS(RR 0.95;95 %CI 0.90-1.01;P = 0.09)的统计学差异不大。POCRT组更容易出现3级或更高的急性毒性,如口腔黏膜炎(RR 1.36;P = 0.44)、吞咽困难(RR 1.57;P = 0.13)和严重皮肤(RR 0.71;P = 0.17),但差异无统计学意义。接受 POCRT 治疗的一组患者出现口腔黏膜炎和吞咽困难的可能性略有增加,但差异未达到统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy combined with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced oral cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone is an important treatment for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. We performed a meta-analysis of published reports about these two treatments.

Methods

We performed an extensive exploration of various databases, such as Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. The study included research on the comparison between postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for oral cancer, with a restriction on the search language to English. The included endpoints consisted of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).

Results

Sixteen studies were included, including 3 prospective studies and 13 retrospective studies, with 3364 patients. For patients with locally advanced oral cancer, compared with PORT, POCRT had better DFS (HR 0.64; 95 % confidence interval [CI],0.48–0.84; P = 0.001), OS (HR 0.76;95 %CI 0.65–0.89; P = 0.0005), and LRC (HR 0.65;95 %CI 0.44–0.95; P = 0.02). There was a tendency for DMFS (RR 0.95;95 %CI 0.90–1.01; P = 0.09) to exhibit a marginal statistical distinction. The risks of grade 3 or higher acute toxicity, such as oral mucositis (RR 1.36; p = 0.44), dysphagia (RR 1.57; p = 0.13), and severe skin (RR 0.71; p = 0.17), were more frequent in the POCRT group, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

For patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma, POCRT is beneficial in terms of DFS, OS, and LRC, but there is no significant benefit in DMFS. The group receiving POCRT exhibited a slightly increased likelihood of experiencing oral mucositis and dysphagia, although the disparity did not attain statistical significance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Clinical and diagnostic features of salivary glands disease related to COVID-19 infection: A systematic review of the literature Tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradio-/radio therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the GRADE approach Tumor budding and complete epithelial mesenchymal transition correlate with late nodal metastasis in early-stage tongue squamous cell carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1