Camille Veit (Psychologue clinicienne, Docteure en psychologie, Maîtresse de conférences en psychopathologie clinique)
{"title":"Les pavés du dire,或当街道成为护理网络时","authors":"Camille Veit (Psychologue clinicienne, Docteure en psychologie, Maîtresse de conférences en psychopathologie clinique)","doi":"10.1016/j.evopsy.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Goals</h3><div>“I am a housed homeless person”. This statement says something about the experience of constructing an address – a term whose polysemy is immediately obvious in the context of therapeutic practices with people who frequent or have frequented the street. Under certain conditions, how can the street become a constellation of care?</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The street is considered here from the perspective of institutional psychotherapy, Lacanian psychoanalysis, and phenomenology. I take a retrospective look at a clinical case, providing insights into, on the one hand, the creation of “spaces of habitability” (de Certeau) and, on the other, the “shared caregiving function” (Tosquelles). I discuss the clinical implications of these findings, as well as their impact on support and accommodation services for the unhoused.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><em>The</em> street doesn’t exist: this is a prerequisite for any possible practice with whoever stays, lives, or makes use of the street. Thus, there is no “street” that can be essentialized: it is constantly made and unmade by those who cross it and inhabit it. The uses of the street – the ways in which it is inhabited – are considered on a case-by-case basis. A distinction between circulation, homelessness, and wandering is then sketched out, based on the concept of “pedestrian enunciation” (Michel de Certeau).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Dwelling is always an attempt at dealing with dreams, ideals, and the impossible. <em>Inhabitable spaces</em> are created between shelters, homes, displacements, and circulations. From a clinical perspective, taking these singular ways of living into account is a prerequisite for any possible encounter. Sometimes, this encounter has therapeutic or even psychotherapeutic effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In light of the above, clinicians should be mindful of adopting a unanimously militant stance, a theoretical withdrawal, charitable kindness, or a desire to rehabilitate at all costs. These slippages are inevitably revealed as such in the interstices of a practice that should be polyphonic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45007,"journal":{"name":"Evolution Psychiatrique","volume":"89 4","pages":"Pages 639-650"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Les pavés du dire, ou quand la rue se fait réseau soignant\",\"authors\":\"Camille Veit (Psychologue clinicienne, Docteure en psychologie, Maîtresse de conférences en psychopathologie clinique)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evopsy.2024.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Goals</h3><div>“I am a housed homeless person”. This statement says something about the experience of constructing an address – a term whose polysemy is immediately obvious in the context of therapeutic practices with people who frequent or have frequented the street. Under certain conditions, how can the street become a constellation of care?</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The street is considered here from the perspective of institutional psychotherapy, Lacanian psychoanalysis, and phenomenology. I take a retrospective look at a clinical case, providing insights into, on the one hand, the creation of “spaces of habitability” (de Certeau) and, on the other, the “shared caregiving function” (Tosquelles). I discuss the clinical implications of these findings, as well as their impact on support and accommodation services for the unhoused.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><em>The</em> street doesn’t exist: this is a prerequisite for any possible practice with whoever stays, lives, or makes use of the street. Thus, there is no “street” that can be essentialized: it is constantly made and unmade by those who cross it and inhabit it. The uses of the street – the ways in which it is inhabited – are considered on a case-by-case basis. A distinction between circulation, homelessness, and wandering is then sketched out, based on the concept of “pedestrian enunciation” (Michel de Certeau).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Dwelling is always an attempt at dealing with dreams, ideals, and the impossible. <em>Inhabitable spaces</em> are created between shelters, homes, displacements, and circulations. From a clinical perspective, taking these singular ways of living into account is a prerequisite for any possible encounter. Sometimes, this encounter has therapeutic or even psychotherapeutic effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In light of the above, clinicians should be mindful of adopting a unanimously militant stance, a theoretical withdrawal, charitable kindness, or a desire to rehabilitate at all costs. These slippages are inevitably revealed as such in the interstices of a practice that should be polyphonic.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution Psychiatrique\",\"volume\":\"89 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 639-650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution Psychiatrique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014385524000689\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution Psychiatrique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014385524000689","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标 "我是一个有住房的无家可归者"。这句话道出了构建一个地址的经验--在对经常或曾经经常在街头出现的人进行治疗的过程中,这个术语的多义性是显而易见的。在某些条件下,街道如何才能成为一种关怀的集合体?方法这里从机构心理治疗、拉康精神分析和现象学的角度来探讨街道。我对一个临床病例进行了回顾性研究,一方面对 "可居住性空间"(德-塞尔托)的创造,另一方面对 "共同的护理功能"(托斯克勒斯)进行了深入探讨。我将讨论这些发现的临床意义,以及它们对为无家可归者提供的支持和住宿服务的影响。结果街道并不存在:这是与任何逗留、居住或使用街道的人开展任何可能的实践的先决条件。因此,不存在可以被本质化的 "街道":街道是由那些穿过街道和居住在街道上的人不断创造和不创造的。街道的用途--街道的居住方式--要根据具体情况来考虑。然后,根据 "行人表达"(Michel de Certeau)的概念,勾勒出流通、无家可归和游荡之间的区别。可居住的空间是在庇护所、家园、流离和循环之间创造出来的。从临床角度来看,考虑到这些独特的生活方式是任何可能的相遇的前提。结语 综上所述,临床医生应注意不要采取一贯的激进立场、理论上的退缩、慈善的仁慈或不惜一切代价进行康复的愿望。在本应是多声部的实践中,不可避免地会出现这样那样的偏差。
Les pavés du dire, ou quand la rue se fait réseau soignant
Goals
“I am a housed homeless person”. This statement says something about the experience of constructing an address – a term whose polysemy is immediately obvious in the context of therapeutic practices with people who frequent or have frequented the street. Under certain conditions, how can the street become a constellation of care?
Method
The street is considered here from the perspective of institutional psychotherapy, Lacanian psychoanalysis, and phenomenology. I take a retrospective look at a clinical case, providing insights into, on the one hand, the creation of “spaces of habitability” (de Certeau) and, on the other, the “shared caregiving function” (Tosquelles). I discuss the clinical implications of these findings, as well as their impact on support and accommodation services for the unhoused.
Results
The street doesn’t exist: this is a prerequisite for any possible practice with whoever stays, lives, or makes use of the street. Thus, there is no “street” that can be essentialized: it is constantly made and unmade by those who cross it and inhabit it. The uses of the street – the ways in which it is inhabited – are considered on a case-by-case basis. A distinction between circulation, homelessness, and wandering is then sketched out, based on the concept of “pedestrian enunciation” (Michel de Certeau).
Discussion
Dwelling is always an attempt at dealing with dreams, ideals, and the impossible. Inhabitable spaces are created between shelters, homes, displacements, and circulations. From a clinical perspective, taking these singular ways of living into account is a prerequisite for any possible encounter. Sometimes, this encounter has therapeutic or even psychotherapeutic effects.
Conclusion
In light of the above, clinicians should be mindful of adopting a unanimously militant stance, a theoretical withdrawal, charitable kindness, or a desire to rehabilitate at all costs. These slippages are inevitably revealed as such in the interstices of a practice that should be polyphonic.
期刊介绍:
Une revue de référence pour le praticien, le chercheur et le étudiant en sciences humaines Cahiers de psychologie clinique et de psychopathologie générale fondés en 1925, Évolution psychiatrique est restée fidèle à sa mission de ouverture de la psychiatrie à tous les courants de pensée scientifique et philosophique, la recherche clinique et les réflexions critiques dans son champ comme dans les domaines connexes. Attentive à histoire de la psychiatrie autant aux dernières avancées de la recherche en biologie, en psychanalyse et en sciences sociales, la revue constitue un outil de information et une source de référence pour les praticiens, les chercheurs et les étudiants.