创伤的相关症状:创伤症状核对表-26(TSC-26)的量表验证

Zoe Emilie Warburg de Chiffre , Johanne Esther Volkmann , Ask Elklit
{"title":"创伤的相关症状:创伤症状核对表-26(TSC-26)的量表验证","authors":"Zoe Emilie Warburg de Chiffre ,&nbsp;Johanne Esther Volkmann ,&nbsp;Ask Elklit","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Trauma Symptoms Checklist-26 (TSC-26) has been used to measure negative affectivity, somatization, and dissociation in several Danish studies, but it has never been validated.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Using data from five studies involving 1576 participants, the factor structure of the TSC- 26 was explored using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Correlation analyses of the associations between scales on the TSC-26 total score, its subscales, and scores on scales measuring related constructs were carried out. Independent samples <em>t</em>-tests of exposure variables were conducted. A test-retest analysis was performed, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated as measures of reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CFA confirmed the expected three-factor structure of the TSC-26, which obtained an acceptable fit with three modifications. The correlation analyses showed strong correlations between TSC-26 and related scales. Independent samples <em>t</em>-tests found significant differences in TSC-26 scores between high- and low trauma exposure groups. Both measures of reliability resulted in high reliability coefficients for the whole scale as well as subscales. Reliability measures and test-retest coefficients were excellent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The total score of the TSC-26 can validly be used to measure negative affectivity, somatization, and dissociation in samples of traumatized individuals. A few scale modifications and the development of a cut-off score are recommended in future studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000516/pdfft?md5=2631792e5608f6e1f4f141db833a29aa&pid=1-s2.0-S2468749924000516-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associated symptoms of traumatization: A scale validation of Trauma symptoms checklist - 26 (TSC-26)\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Emilie Warburg de Chiffre ,&nbsp;Johanne Esther Volkmann ,&nbsp;Ask Elklit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Trauma Symptoms Checklist-26 (TSC-26) has been used to measure negative affectivity, somatization, and dissociation in several Danish studies, but it has never been validated.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Using data from five studies involving 1576 participants, the factor structure of the TSC- 26 was explored using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Correlation analyses of the associations between scales on the TSC-26 total score, its subscales, and scores on scales measuring related constructs were carried out. Independent samples <em>t</em>-tests of exposure variables were conducted. A test-retest analysis was performed, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated as measures of reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CFA confirmed the expected three-factor structure of the TSC-26, which obtained an acceptable fit with three modifications. The correlation analyses showed strong correlations between TSC-26 and related scales. Independent samples <em>t</em>-tests found significant differences in TSC-26 scores between high- and low trauma exposure groups. Both measures of reliability resulted in high reliability coefficients for the whole scale as well as subscales. Reliability measures and test-retest coefficients were excellent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The total score of the TSC-26 can validly be used to measure negative affectivity, somatization, and dissociation in samples of traumatized individuals. A few scale modifications and the development of a cut-off score are recommended in future studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000516/pdfft?md5=2631792e5608f6e1f4f141db833a29aa&pid=1-s2.0-S2468749924000516-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在多项丹麦研究中,TSC-26(Trauma Symptoms Checklist-26)被用于测量负性情绪、躯体化和解离,但它从未经过验证。对 TSC-26 总分、其分量表以及测量相关结构的量表得分之间的关联进行了相关性分析。对暴露变量进行了独立样本 t 检验。结果CFA证实了TSC-26的预期三因素结构,经过三次修改后,该结构的拟合度可以接受。相关分析表明,TSC-26 与相关量表之间存在很强的相关性。独立样本 t 检验发现,TSC-26 评分在高创伤暴露组和低创伤暴露组之间存在显著差异。两个信度测量结果显示,整个量表和各分量表的信度系数都很高。结论TSC-26的总分可以有效地用于测量创伤个体样本中的负性情绪、躯体化和分离。建议在今后的研究中对量表进行一些修改,并制定一个临界分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associated symptoms of traumatization: A scale validation of Trauma symptoms checklist - 26 (TSC-26)

Background

The Trauma Symptoms Checklist-26 (TSC-26) has been used to measure negative affectivity, somatization, and dissociation in several Danish studies, but it has never been validated.

Method

Using data from five studies involving 1576 participants, the factor structure of the TSC- 26 was explored using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Correlation analyses of the associations between scales on the TSC-26 total score, its subscales, and scores on scales measuring related constructs were carried out. Independent samples t-tests of exposure variables were conducted. A test-retest analysis was performed, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated as measures of reliability.

Results

The CFA confirmed the expected three-factor structure of the TSC-26, which obtained an acceptable fit with three modifications. The correlation analyses showed strong correlations between TSC-26 and related scales. Independent samples t-tests found significant differences in TSC-26 scores between high- and low trauma exposure groups. Both measures of reliability resulted in high reliability coefficients for the whole scale as well as subscales. Reliability measures and test-retest coefficients were excellent.

Conclusion

The total score of the TSC-26 can validly be used to measure negative affectivity, somatization, and dissociation in samples of traumatized individuals. A few scale modifications and the development of a cut-off score are recommended in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories for Complex PTSD – A pilot quasi-experimental study from a wellness centre in India Adverse childhood experiences and dissociation among Italian public psychology service users Résistance et trauma: introduire l'existence Exploring the interplay between dreams, Early Maladaptive Schemas and demanding parenting style in Malaysia: A qualitative study Parent-Child EMDR therapy for children aged 0–4 years: Protocol, pilot-data, and case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1