乌克兰和叙利亚人道主义危机中的欧盟移民政策理论分析:是身份排斥?仇外的双重标准?

Mehmet Recai Uygur, Hamza Bahadır Eser
{"title":"乌克兰和叙利亚人道主义危机中的欧盟移民政策理论分析:是身份排斥?仇外的双重标准?","authors":"Mehmet Recai Uygur, Hamza Bahadır Eser","doi":"10.12658/m0730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the different attitudes of the European Union towards Ukrainian and Syrian refugees in its migration policies were examined. The intellectual infrastructure of these attitudes is analyzed within the framework of international relations theories such as The English School, which emphasizes the phenomenon of international society, Social Constructivism theory which emphasizes the construction of common identity and Securitization theory, which examines the process of making a political phenomenon a security issue. In addition to these approaches, the reasons for the double standard of the European Union in their migration policies are also examined in terms of the framework of geographical proximity. It emphasized to what extent the historical memories of European countries have an impact on their migration policies in the text. The theoretical analysis of the different attitudes of the European Union in the face of basically two similar events examined how these policies evolved into xenophobia and how they are fed by the current xenophobic phenomenon in Western Europe. In conclusion, it can be stated that xenophobia is a socio-psychological phenomenon in Western Europe, and this phenomenon is effective both in the determination of daily populist politics and in the attitudes preferred in the face of refugee policies.","PeriodicalId":507670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanity and Society (insan & toplum)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Theoretical Analysis of The European Union’s Immigration Policies in The Case of The Ukraine and Syria Humanitarian Crisis: Is It an Identity Exclusion? A Xenophobic Double Standard?\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Recai Uygur, Hamza Bahadır Eser\",\"doi\":\"10.12658/m0730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the different attitudes of the European Union towards Ukrainian and Syrian refugees in its migration policies were examined. The intellectual infrastructure of these attitudes is analyzed within the framework of international relations theories such as The English School, which emphasizes the phenomenon of international society, Social Constructivism theory which emphasizes the construction of common identity and Securitization theory, which examines the process of making a political phenomenon a security issue. In addition to these approaches, the reasons for the double standard of the European Union in their migration policies are also examined in terms of the framework of geographical proximity. It emphasized to what extent the historical memories of European countries have an impact on their migration policies in the text. The theoretical analysis of the different attitudes of the European Union in the face of basically two similar events examined how these policies evolved into xenophobia and how they are fed by the current xenophobic phenomenon in Western Europe. In conclusion, it can be stated that xenophobia is a socio-psychological phenomenon in Western Europe, and this phenomenon is effective both in the determination of daily populist politics and in the attitudes preferred in the face of refugee policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Humanity and Society (insan & toplum)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Humanity and Society (insan & toplum)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12658/m0730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanity and Society (insan & toplum)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12658/m0730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了欧盟在移民政策中对乌克兰和叙利亚难民的不同态度。在强调国际社会现象的英国学派、强调共同身份建构的社会建构主义理论以及研究将政治现象变成安全问题的过程的安全化理论等国际关系理论框架内,对这些态度的知识基础进行了分析。除这些方法外,还从地理邻近性框架的角度研究了欧盟在其移民政策中采用双重标准的原因。文中强调了欧洲国家的历史记忆对其移民政策的影响程度。对欧盟在面对基本相似的两起事件时的不同态度进行了理论分析,研究了这些政策是如何演变成仇外心理的,以及它们是如何被当前西欧的仇外现象所滋养的。总之,可以说仇外心理是西欧的一种社会心理现象,这种现象在决定日常的民粹主义政治和面对难民政策的态度上都是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Theoretical Analysis of The European Union’s Immigration Policies in The Case of The Ukraine and Syria Humanitarian Crisis: Is It an Identity Exclusion? A Xenophobic Double Standard?
In this study, the different attitudes of the European Union towards Ukrainian and Syrian refugees in its migration policies were examined. The intellectual infrastructure of these attitudes is analyzed within the framework of international relations theories such as The English School, which emphasizes the phenomenon of international society, Social Constructivism theory which emphasizes the construction of common identity and Securitization theory, which examines the process of making a political phenomenon a security issue. In addition to these approaches, the reasons for the double standard of the European Union in their migration policies are also examined in terms of the framework of geographical proximity. It emphasized to what extent the historical memories of European countries have an impact on their migration policies in the text. The theoretical analysis of the different attitudes of the European Union in the face of basically two similar events examined how these policies evolved into xenophobia and how they are fed by the current xenophobic phenomenon in Western Europe. In conclusion, it can be stated that xenophobia is a socio-psychological phenomenon in Western Europe, and this phenomenon is effective both in the determination of daily populist politics and in the attitudes preferred in the face of refugee policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aydınlar ve İktidar: Erol Güngör’ün Orta Doğu Yazılarında Milliyetçi Cephe Koalisyonları Richard Hoggart, Okuryazarlığın Kullanımları: İşçi Sınıfı Yaşamının Veçheleri, Çeviri: Mümtaz Kirik, Levent Ünsaldı, Heretik Yayınları, 2022, 528 s. Çin’in Nükleer Stratejisinde Sapma: ABD Kaynaklı Tehdit Algıları ve Garantili Misilleme Arayışı Islamism, Death, and Justice: A Comparative History of Political Thought Daud Abdullah, Engaging the World: The Making of Hamas’s Foreign Policy, Afro-Middle East Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2021, 246 s.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1