评估洪水深度对水质、养分吸收、碳固存以及在 Histosols 上种植的水稻产量的影响

Yuchuan Fan , Naba R. Amgain , Abul Rabbany , Noel Manirakiza , Xue Bai , Matthew VanWeelden , Jehangir H. Bhadha
{"title":"评估洪水深度对水质、养分吸收、碳固存以及在 Histosols 上种植的水稻产量的影响","authors":"Yuchuan Fan ,&nbsp;Naba R. Amgain ,&nbsp;Abul Rabbany ,&nbsp;Noel Manirakiza ,&nbsp;Xue Bai ,&nbsp;Matthew VanWeelden ,&nbsp;Jehangir H. Bhadha","doi":"10.1016/j.csag.2024.100005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA), Florida, cultivating rice in flooded paddies is becoming increasingly popular to conserve water and soil health. Flood depth is a critical factor affecting the discharged water quality, soil carbon, and yield production. However, few studies have comprehensively investigated the optimal flood depth in EAA, considering multi-functional indices. To address this gap, we investigated drainage water quality, water quantity, nutrient uptake, soil carbon, and rice yield in rice paddies in histosol soils over a two-year period at four flood depths (5, 10, 15, and 20 ​cm). For each flood depth, averaged over two years, total outflow loadings of suspended solids, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were significantly reduced by 40 ​%, 38 ​%, 36 ​%, and 32 ​%, respectively, compared to inflow water loadings (<em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.001). Total phosphorus uptake averaged ∼11.21 kg ha<sup><strong>−</strong>1</sup> in rice shoots and 0.48 kg ha<sup><strong>−</strong>1</sup> in roots, while total potassium uptake averaged ∼4.28 kg ha<sup><strong>−</strong>1</sup> in shoots and 0.13 kg ha<sup><strong>−</strong>1</sup> in roots. Soil organic carbon (SOC) in 5, 10, 15, and 20 ​cm flood treatments increased annually at a rate of 3.85 ​%, 5.64 ​%, 6.86 ​%, and 6.86 ​%, respectively; for these same treatments, soil active organic carbon (AOC) decreased annually at rates of 11.75 ​%, 8.63 ​%, 20.07 ​%, and 8.48 ​%, and rice grain yield was 4488, 5103, 5450, and 5386 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Overall, considering the water quality, SOC, AOC, and rice yield production, irrigating rice paddies at a flood depth of 15 ​cm most effectively improves water quality, increases carbon sequestration, reduces active carbon, and yields more rice than other flood depths. By evaluating the effects of flood depth on the soil–water–plant nexus in a holistic manner, we propose a more sustainable and environmentally friendly mode of rice cultivation within the EAA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100262,"journal":{"name":"Climate Smart Agriculture","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950409024000054/pdfft?md5=83ba399c50b0a3beb67af6286af3840d&pid=1-s2.0-S2950409024000054-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flooding-depth effects on water quality, soil carbon sequestration, rice nutrient uptake and yield at the Everglades Agricultural Area of Florida\",\"authors\":\"Yuchuan Fan ,&nbsp;Naba R. Amgain ,&nbsp;Abul Rabbany ,&nbsp;Noel Manirakiza ,&nbsp;Xue Bai ,&nbsp;Matthew VanWeelden ,&nbsp;Jehangir H. Bhadha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csag.2024.100005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA), Florida, cultivating rice in flooded paddies is becoming increasingly popular to conserve water and soil health. Flood depth is a critical factor affecting the discharged water quality, soil carbon, and yield production. However, few studies have comprehensively investigated the optimal flood depth in EAA, considering multi-functional indices. To address this gap, we investigated drainage water quality, water quantity, nutrient uptake, soil carbon, and rice yield in rice paddies in histosol soils over a two-year period at four flood depths (5, 10, 15, and 20 ​cm). For each flood depth, averaged over two years, total outflow loadings of suspended solids, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were significantly reduced by 40 ​%, 38 ​%, 36 ​%, and 32 ​%, respectively, compared to inflow water loadings (<em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.001). Total phosphorus uptake averaged ∼11.21 kg ha<sup><strong>−</strong>1</sup> in rice shoots and 0.48 kg ha<sup><strong>−</strong>1</sup> in roots, while total potassium uptake averaged ∼4.28 kg ha<sup><strong>−</strong>1</sup> in shoots and 0.13 kg ha<sup><strong>−</strong>1</sup> in roots. Soil organic carbon (SOC) in 5, 10, 15, and 20 ​cm flood treatments increased annually at a rate of 3.85 ​%, 5.64 ​%, 6.86 ​%, and 6.86 ​%, respectively; for these same treatments, soil active organic carbon (AOC) decreased annually at rates of 11.75 ​%, 8.63 ​%, 20.07 ​%, and 8.48 ​%, and rice grain yield was 4488, 5103, 5450, and 5386 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Overall, considering the water quality, SOC, AOC, and rice yield production, irrigating rice paddies at a flood depth of 15 ​cm most effectively improves water quality, increases carbon sequestration, reduces active carbon, and yields more rice than other flood depths. By evaluating the effects of flood depth on the soil–water–plant nexus in a holistic manner, we propose a more sustainable and environmentally friendly mode of rice cultivation within the EAA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate Smart Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950409024000054/pdfft?md5=83ba399c50b0a3beb67af6286af3840d&pid=1-s2.0-S2950409024000054-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate Smart Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950409024000054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Smart Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950409024000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在佛罗里达州的大沼泽农业区(EAA),为了节约用水和保持土壤健康,在水田中种植水稻越来越受欢迎。淹水深度是影响排水水质、土壤碳含量和产量的关键因素。然而,很少有研究综合考虑多种功能指数,全面调查了 EAA 的最佳淹没深度。为了弥补这一空白,我们调查了组壤土稻田两年内四种淹没深度(5、10、15 和 20 厘米)的排水水质、水量、养分吸收、土壤碳和水稻产量。与流入水量相比,每种洪水深度两年的平均悬浮固体、氮、磷和钾的总流出量分别显著减少了 40%、38%、36% 和 32%(p < 0.001)。水稻嫩芽和根系对总磷的平均吸收量分别为 11.21 千克/公顷和 0.48 千克/公顷;水稻嫩芽和根系对总钾的平均吸收量分别为 4.28 千克/公顷和 0.13 千克/公顷。5 厘米、10 厘米、15 厘米和 20 厘米淹水处理的土壤有机碳(SOC)年增长率分别为 3.85 %、5.64 %、6.86 % 和 6.86 %;相同处理的土壤有机活性碳(AOC)年下降率分别为 11.75 %、8.63 %、20.07 % 和 8.48 %,稻谷产量分别为 4488、5103、5450 和 5386 千克/公顷。总体而言,考虑到水质、SOC、AOC 和水稻产量,与其他灌溉深度相比,15 厘米灌溉深度最有效地改善了水质,增加了固碳量,减少了活性碳,并提高了水稻产量。通过全面评估灌水深度对土壤-水-植物关系的影响,我们提出了一种更可持续、更环保的高山区水稻种植模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flooding-depth effects on water quality, soil carbon sequestration, rice nutrient uptake and yield at the Everglades Agricultural Area of Florida

In the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA), Florida, cultivating rice in flooded paddies is becoming increasingly popular to conserve water and soil health. Flood depth is a critical factor affecting the discharged water quality, soil carbon, and yield production. However, few studies have comprehensively investigated the optimal flood depth in EAA, considering multi-functional indices. To address this gap, we investigated drainage water quality, water quantity, nutrient uptake, soil carbon, and rice yield in rice paddies in histosol soils over a two-year period at four flood depths (5, 10, 15, and 20 ​cm). For each flood depth, averaged over two years, total outflow loadings of suspended solids, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were significantly reduced by 40 ​%, 38 ​%, 36 ​%, and 32 ​%, respectively, compared to inflow water loadings (p ​< ​0.001). Total phosphorus uptake averaged ∼11.21 kg ha1 in rice shoots and 0.48 kg ha1 in roots, while total potassium uptake averaged ∼4.28 kg ha1 in shoots and 0.13 kg ha1 in roots. Soil organic carbon (SOC) in 5, 10, 15, and 20 ​cm flood treatments increased annually at a rate of 3.85 ​%, 5.64 ​%, 6.86 ​%, and 6.86 ​%, respectively; for these same treatments, soil active organic carbon (AOC) decreased annually at rates of 11.75 ​%, 8.63 ​%, 20.07 ​%, and 8.48 ​%, and rice grain yield was 4488, 5103, 5450, and 5386 ​kg ​ha−1, respectively. Overall, considering the water quality, SOC, AOC, and rice yield production, irrigating rice paddies at a flood depth of 15 ​cm most effectively improves water quality, increases carbon sequestration, reduces active carbon, and yields more rice than other flood depths. By evaluating the effects of flood depth on the soil–water–plant nexus in a holistic manner, we propose a more sustainable and environmentally friendly mode of rice cultivation within the EAA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Amine ester improves rice growth and resistance by promoting ammonium and potassium uptake Maize–peanut intercropping and N fertilization changed the potential nitrification rate by regulating the ratio of AOB to AOA in soils Assessing spatiotemporal variations of soil organic carbon and its vulnerability to climate change: A bottom-up machine learning approach Trends in the research on soil nitrogen leaching from farmland: A bibliometric analysis (2014–2023) The potential to reduce runoff generation through improving cropping and tillage practices in a sub-humid continental climate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1