关于在远程工作环境中同伴的存在对审计员怀疑性判断和行动的影响的初步证据

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Behavioral Research in Accounting Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.2308/bria-2023-048
Steven Dannemiller
{"title":"关于在远程工作环境中同伴的存在对审计员怀疑性判断和行动的影响的初步证据","authors":"Steven Dannemiller","doi":"10.2308/bria-2023-048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The increased prevalence of remote work is causing auditors to work more often in isolation. To address this, firms are using virtual audit rooms in an attempt to mimic the traditional social environment of auditing. Social Facilitation Theory predicts that auditors’ adherence to team guidance is increasing to the extent of felt presence of others. I examine how physical and virtual presence of the audit team, compared to working alone, facilitates the incorporation of team guidance encouraging skepticism. I predict that auditors engage in this behavior most frequently in the physical presence of their team, somewhat less frequently in the virtual presence of their team, and least frequently when working alone. For skeptical actions, results do not support these expectations. However, for skeptical judgments, participants view audit evidence more skeptically when in the virtual presence of peers compared to alone. Low statistical power may limit the generalizability of the results.\n Data Availability: Data are available from the author upon request.","PeriodicalId":46356,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Evidence on the Impact of the Felt Presence of Peers on Auditor Skeptical Judgment and Action in a Remote Work Setting\",\"authors\":\"Steven Dannemiller\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/bria-2023-048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The increased prevalence of remote work is causing auditors to work more often in isolation. To address this, firms are using virtual audit rooms in an attempt to mimic the traditional social environment of auditing. Social Facilitation Theory predicts that auditors’ adherence to team guidance is increasing to the extent of felt presence of others. I examine how physical and virtual presence of the audit team, compared to working alone, facilitates the incorporation of team guidance encouraging skepticism. I predict that auditors engage in this behavior most frequently in the physical presence of their team, somewhat less frequently in the virtual presence of their team, and least frequently when working alone. For skeptical actions, results do not support these expectations. However, for skeptical judgments, participants view audit evidence more skeptically when in the virtual presence of peers compared to alone. Low statistical power may limit the generalizability of the results.\\n Data Availability: Data are available from the author upon request.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Research in Accounting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Research in Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2023-048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2023-048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

远程工作越来越普遍,导致审计人员更经常地孤立工作。为了解决这个问题,公司正在使用虚拟审计室,试图模拟传统的审计社会环境。社会促进理论预测,审计师对团队指导的遵守程度会随着感觉到他人存在的程度而增加。与单独工作相比,我研究了审计团队的实际存在和虚拟存在如何促进团队指导的融入,从而鼓励怀疑主义。我预测,审计人员在团队成员在场的情况下最常做出这种行为,在团队成员虚拟在场的情况下做出这种行为的频率略低,而单独工作时做出这种行为的频率最低。对于怀疑行动,结果并不支持这些预期。然而,在怀疑性判断方面,与单独行动相比,参与者在同伴虚拟在场的情况下对审计证据的怀疑程度更高。统计能力较低可能会限制结果的普遍性。数据可用性:数据可向作者索取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preliminary Evidence on the Impact of the Felt Presence of Peers on Auditor Skeptical Judgment and Action in a Remote Work Setting
The increased prevalence of remote work is causing auditors to work more often in isolation. To address this, firms are using virtual audit rooms in an attempt to mimic the traditional social environment of auditing. Social Facilitation Theory predicts that auditors’ adherence to team guidance is increasing to the extent of felt presence of others. I examine how physical and virtual presence of the audit team, compared to working alone, facilitates the incorporation of team guidance encouraging skepticism. I predict that auditors engage in this behavior most frequently in the physical presence of their team, somewhat less frequently in the virtual presence of their team, and least frequently when working alone. For skeptical actions, results do not support these expectations. However, for skeptical judgments, participants view audit evidence more skeptically when in the virtual presence of peers compared to alone. Low statistical power may limit the generalizability of the results. Data Availability: Data are available from the author upon request.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Audit Committee Strength on the Influence of Management Team Likeability Seeing the Trees: How a Concrete versus Abstract Mindset Improves Performance on Low-Level Assurance Tasks Preliminary Evidence on the Impact of the Felt Presence of Peers on Auditor Skeptical Judgment and Action in a Remote Work Setting Why Do Investors Rely on Low-Quality Investment Advice? Experimental Evidence from Social Media Platforms Strategic Bias in Team Members’ Communication about Relative Contributions: The Effects of Voluntary Communication and Explanation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1