中学生的情绪、对教学质量的看法和数学成绩:对瑞士义务教育末期学生的代表性研究

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Contemporary Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102295
{"title":"中学生的情绪、对教学质量的看法和数学成绩:对瑞士义务教育末期学生的代表性研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The role of emotions in learning settings such as schools has been widely acknowledged in research and practice. Prior research predominantly follows a variable-centred approach to investigate students’ emotions while person-centred analyses are still scarce. Based on a representative sample of <em>N</em> = 11 131 Swiss students in grade 9, this cross-sectional large-scale study investigates how four trait mathematics emotions (enjoyment, anger, anxiety and boredom) are related to students’ perception of mathematics instruction quality (cognitive activation, lack of classroom management, teacher support) and their mathematics test achievement. Results from structural equation modelling (variable-centred approach) revealed that enjoyment and all three negative emotions are related to two dimensions of instructional quality: cognitive activation and lack of classroom management. Association of emotions with teacher support differed, as associations were not confirmed for enjoyment and anxiety. Enjoyment was not related to achievement, whereas boredom showed positive associations. The results from mediation analyses suggest that the direct associations of perceived cognitive activation and perceived lack of classroom management with mathematics achievement are stronger compared to the indirect associations mediated by student emotions. Latent profile analysis identified four profiles: happy, unhappy, bored, and ambivalent. Students in the happy profile had the highest perception of instructional quality and outperformed the other profiles. Results are discussed in relation to the added value of a person-centred approach to better understand students’ emotions in mathematics education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary students' emotions, perceptions of instructional quality, and achievement in Mathematics: A representative study with Swiss students towards the end of compulsory education\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The role of emotions in learning settings such as schools has been widely acknowledged in research and practice. Prior research predominantly follows a variable-centred approach to investigate students’ emotions while person-centred analyses are still scarce. Based on a representative sample of <em>N</em> = 11 131 Swiss students in grade 9, this cross-sectional large-scale study investigates how four trait mathematics emotions (enjoyment, anger, anxiety and boredom) are related to students’ perception of mathematics instruction quality (cognitive activation, lack of classroom management, teacher support) and their mathematics test achievement. Results from structural equation modelling (variable-centred approach) revealed that enjoyment and all three negative emotions are related to two dimensions of instructional quality: cognitive activation and lack of classroom management. Association of emotions with teacher support differed, as associations were not confirmed for enjoyment and anxiety. Enjoyment was not related to achievement, whereas boredom showed positive associations. The results from mediation analyses suggest that the direct associations of perceived cognitive activation and perceived lack of classroom management with mathematics achievement are stronger compared to the indirect associations mediated by student emotions. Latent profile analysis identified four profiles: happy, unhappy, bored, and ambivalent. Students in the happy profile had the highest perception of instructional quality and outperformed the other profiles. Results are discussed in relation to the added value of a person-centred approach to better understand students’ emotions in mathematics education.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000407\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000407","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

情绪在学校等学习环境中的作用已在研究和实践中得到广泛认可。先前的研究主要采用以变量为中心的方法来调查学生的情绪,而以人为中心的分析仍然很少。这项横断面大规模研究以具有代表性的 11 131 名瑞士九年级学生为样本,调查了四种特质数学情绪(愉快、愤怒、焦虑和无聊)与学生对数学教学质量(认知激活、缺乏课堂管理、教师支持)的感知及其数学考试成绩之间的关系。结构方程模型(以变量为中心的方法)的结果显示,愉快和所有三种负面情绪与教学质量的两个维度有关:认知激活和缺乏课堂管理。情绪与教师支持的相关性有所不同,因为愉悦和焦虑的相关性未得到证实。愉快情绪与成绩无关,而无聊情绪与成绩呈正相关。中介分析的结果表明,认知激活和课堂管理缺失与数学成绩的直接关联要强于由学生情绪中介的间接关联。潜特征分析确定了四种特征:快乐、不快乐、无聊和矛盾。快乐型学生对教学质量的感知最高,表现优于其他类型。研究结果就以人为本的方法在数学教育中更好地了解学生情绪的附加价值进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Secondary students' emotions, perceptions of instructional quality, and achievement in Mathematics: A representative study with Swiss students towards the end of compulsory education

The role of emotions in learning settings such as schools has been widely acknowledged in research and practice. Prior research predominantly follows a variable-centred approach to investigate students’ emotions while person-centred analyses are still scarce. Based on a representative sample of N = 11 131 Swiss students in grade 9, this cross-sectional large-scale study investigates how four trait mathematics emotions (enjoyment, anger, anxiety and boredom) are related to students’ perception of mathematics instruction quality (cognitive activation, lack of classroom management, teacher support) and their mathematics test achievement. Results from structural equation modelling (variable-centred approach) revealed that enjoyment and all three negative emotions are related to two dimensions of instructional quality: cognitive activation and lack of classroom management. Association of emotions with teacher support differed, as associations were not confirmed for enjoyment and anxiety. Enjoyment was not related to achievement, whereas boredom showed positive associations. The results from mediation analyses suggest that the direct associations of perceived cognitive activation and perceived lack of classroom management with mathematics achievement are stronger compared to the indirect associations mediated by student emotions. Latent profile analysis identified four profiles: happy, unhappy, bored, and ambivalent. Students in the happy profile had the highest perception of instructional quality and outperformed the other profiles. Results are discussed in relation to the added value of a person-centred approach to better understand students’ emotions in mathematics education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
期刊最新文献
Teacher-Parent academic support profiles: Links to Children’s task persistence in Grades 2 and 3 Socioemotional classroom environments mediating teacher expectation effects: A multilevel structural equation modeling approach Trajectories of advanced math taking for low-income students of color in middle and high school Lesson-specific control-value appraisals and achievement emotions in maths: A combination with the standardized questionnaire survey Early fraction relational reasoning uniquely predicts later algebraic thinking in children: A longitudinal study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1