分级不完整字母测试 (GILT):检测大脑皮层视力损失的快速测试,在英国生物银行实施。

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Behavior Research Methods Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02448-7
Kxx Yong, A Petzold, P Foster, A Young, S Bell, Y Bai, A P Leff, S Crutch, J A Greenwood
{"title":"分级不完整字母测试 (GILT):检测大脑皮层视力损失的快速测试,在英国生物银行实施。","authors":"Kxx Yong, A Petzold, P Foster, A Young, S Bell, Y Bai, A P Leff, S Crutch, J A Greenwood","doi":"10.3758/s13428-024-02448-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Impairments of object recognition are core features of neurodegenerative syndromes, in particular posterior cortical atrophy (PCA; the 'visual-variant Alzheimer's disease'). These impairments arise from damage to higher-level cortical visual regions and are often missed or misattributed to common ophthalmological conditions. Consequently, diagnosis can be delayed for years with considerable implications for patients. We report a new test for the rapid measurement of cortical visual loss - the Graded Incomplete Letters Test (GILT). The GILT is an optimised psychophysical variation of a test used to diagnose cortical visual impairment, which measures thresholds for recognising letters under levels of increasing visual degradation (decreasing \"completeness\") in a similar fashion to ophthalmic tests. The GILT was administered to UK Biobank participants (total n=2,359) and participants with neurodegenerative conditions characterised by initial cortical visual (PCA, n=18) or memory loss (typical Alzheimer's disease, n=9). UK Biobank participants, including both typical adults and those with ophthalmological conditions, were able to recognise letters under low levels of completeness. In contrast, participants with PCA consistently made errors with only modest decreases in completeness. GILT sensitivity to PCA was 83.3% for participants reaching the 80% accuracy cut-off, increasing to 88.9% using alternative cut-offs (60% or 100% accuracy). Specificity values were consistently over 94% when compared to UK Biobank participants without or with documented visual conditions, regardless of accuracy cut-off. These first-release UK Biobank and clinical verification data suggest the GILT has utility in both rapidly detecting visual perceptual losses following posterior cortical damage and differentiating perceptual losses from common eye-related conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Graded Incomplete Letters Test (GILT): a rapid test to detect cortical visual loss, with UK Biobank implementation.\",\"authors\":\"Kxx Yong, A Petzold, P Foster, A Young, S Bell, Y Bai, A P Leff, S Crutch, J A Greenwood\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13428-024-02448-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Impairments of object recognition are core features of neurodegenerative syndromes, in particular posterior cortical atrophy (PCA; the 'visual-variant Alzheimer's disease'). These impairments arise from damage to higher-level cortical visual regions and are often missed or misattributed to common ophthalmological conditions. Consequently, diagnosis can be delayed for years with considerable implications for patients. We report a new test for the rapid measurement of cortical visual loss - the Graded Incomplete Letters Test (GILT). The GILT is an optimised psychophysical variation of a test used to diagnose cortical visual impairment, which measures thresholds for recognising letters under levels of increasing visual degradation (decreasing \\\"completeness\\\") in a similar fashion to ophthalmic tests. The GILT was administered to UK Biobank participants (total n=2,359) and participants with neurodegenerative conditions characterised by initial cortical visual (PCA, n=18) or memory loss (typical Alzheimer's disease, n=9). UK Biobank participants, including both typical adults and those with ophthalmological conditions, were able to recognise letters under low levels of completeness. In contrast, participants with PCA consistently made errors with only modest decreases in completeness. GILT sensitivity to PCA was 83.3% for participants reaching the 80% accuracy cut-off, increasing to 88.9% using alternative cut-offs (60% or 100% accuracy). Specificity values were consistently over 94% when compared to UK Biobank participants without or with documented visual conditions, regardless of accuracy cut-off. These first-release UK Biobank and clinical verification data suggest the GILT has utility in both rapidly detecting visual perceptual losses following posterior cortical damage and differentiating perceptual losses from common eye-related conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362218/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02448-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02448-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物体识别障碍是神经退行性综合症的核心特征,尤其是后皮质萎缩(PCA;"视觉变异性阿尔茨海默病")。这些障碍源于高级皮层视觉区域的损伤,常常被漏诊或误诊为常见的眼科疾病。因此,诊断可能会延迟数年,对患者造成相当大的影响。我们报告了一种快速测量大脑皮层视力损失的新测试--分级不完全字母测试(GILT)。GILT 是对用于诊断大脑皮层视力损伤的一项测试的心理物理学变体的优化,它以类似于眼科测试的方式测量在视觉退化程度不断增加("完整度 "不断降低)的情况下识别字母的阈值。英国生物库参与者(总人数=2,359 人)和患有神经退行性疾病的参与者均接受了 GILT 测试,这些疾病的特征是最初的皮层视觉(PCA,人数=18 人)或记忆丧失(典型的阿尔茨海默病,人数=9 人)。英国生物库的参与者,包括典型的成年人和患有眼科疾病的人,都能在低完整度的情况下识别字母。与此相反,患有 PCA 的参与者在完整度略有下降的情况下也会持续出错。在准确率达到 80% 临界值时,GILT 对 PCA 的灵敏度为 83.3%,而在使用其他临界值(准确率为 60% 或 100%)时,灵敏度则增至 88.9%。无论采用哪种准确度临界值,与英国生物样本库中未记录或记录有视力状况的参与者相比,特异性值始终超过 94%。这些首次发布的英国生物库和临床验证数据表明,GILT 在快速检测后部皮质损伤后的视觉知觉损失以及区分知觉损失与常见眼部相关疾病方面都很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Graded Incomplete Letters Test (GILT): a rapid test to detect cortical visual loss, with UK Biobank implementation.

Impairments of object recognition are core features of neurodegenerative syndromes, in particular posterior cortical atrophy (PCA; the 'visual-variant Alzheimer's disease'). These impairments arise from damage to higher-level cortical visual regions and are often missed or misattributed to common ophthalmological conditions. Consequently, diagnosis can be delayed for years with considerable implications for patients. We report a new test for the rapid measurement of cortical visual loss - the Graded Incomplete Letters Test (GILT). The GILT is an optimised psychophysical variation of a test used to diagnose cortical visual impairment, which measures thresholds for recognising letters under levels of increasing visual degradation (decreasing "completeness") in a similar fashion to ophthalmic tests. The GILT was administered to UK Biobank participants (total n=2,359) and participants with neurodegenerative conditions characterised by initial cortical visual (PCA, n=18) or memory loss (typical Alzheimer's disease, n=9). UK Biobank participants, including both typical adults and those with ophthalmological conditions, were able to recognise letters under low levels of completeness. In contrast, participants with PCA consistently made errors with only modest decreases in completeness. GILT sensitivity to PCA was 83.3% for participants reaching the 80% accuracy cut-off, increasing to 88.9% using alternative cut-offs (60% or 100% accuracy). Specificity values were consistently over 94% when compared to UK Biobank participants without or with documented visual conditions, regardless of accuracy cut-off. These first-release UK Biobank and clinical verification data suggest the GILT has utility in both rapidly detecting visual perceptual losses following posterior cortical damage and differentiating perceptual losses from common eye-related conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
期刊最新文献
Publisher Correction: Dimensionality and optimal combination of autonomic fear-conditioning measures in humans. Author Correction: Discovering trends of social interaction behavior over time: An introduction to relational event modeling. Author Correction: r2mlm: An R package calculating R-squared measures for multilevel models. Correction: Development and validation of the Emotional Climate Change Stories (ECCS) stimuli set. Geofencing in location-based behavioral research: Methodology, challenges, and implementation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1