{"title":"免疫抑制疗法对心脏植入式电子设备植入术后引线脱落的影响","authors":"Yasuhiro Matsuda, Masaharu Masuda, Mitsutoshi Asai, Shin Okamoto, Takayuki Ishihara, Kiyonori Nanto, Takuya Tsujimura, Yosuke Hata, Hiroyuki Uematsu, Naoko Higashino, Sho Nakao, Masaya Kusuda, Toshiaki Mano","doi":"10.1002/clc.24310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Backgrounds</h3>\n \n <p>Lead dislodgement is a severe complication in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Inflammation after CIED implantation results in the development of adhesions between lead and tissues, resulting in the lead becoming fixed in the body. In patients with immunosuppressive therapy, however, adhesion is inhibited by anti-inflammatory effects. However, the association between lead dislodgement and immunosuppressive therapy has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lead dislodgement and immunosuppressive therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Hypothesis</h3>\n \n <p>We hypothesized that lead dislodgement more frequently occur in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than those without.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 651 consecutive patients who underwent CIED implantation or lead addition (age, 76 ± 11 years; and males, 374 [58%], high voltage device, 121 [19%], lead addition 23 [4%]) were retrospectively enrolled. Immunosuppressive therapy was with regular steroids or immunosuppressants. Lead placement was guided by fluoroscopy, and active fixation leads were used. Restraint of the upper limb by chest tape was performed for 1 week after the procedure. Lead dislodgement was defined as a change in lead position and/or lead failure requiring reoperation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty (3.1%) patients received immunosuppressive therapy. Among these, 15 (2.3%) patients regularly took steroids and 8 (1.2%) took immunosuppressants. Lead dislodgement occurred in 10 (1.5%) patients. Lead dislodgement was more frequent in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than in those without (3 [15%] vs. 7 [1%], <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In patients with CIED implantation or lead addition, lead dislodgement is more frequent in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than in those without.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.24310","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Immunosuppressive Therapy on Lead Dislodgement After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation\",\"authors\":\"Yasuhiro Matsuda, Masaharu Masuda, Mitsutoshi Asai, Shin Okamoto, Takayuki Ishihara, Kiyonori Nanto, Takuya Tsujimura, Yosuke Hata, Hiroyuki Uematsu, Naoko Higashino, Sho Nakao, Masaya Kusuda, Toshiaki Mano\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clc.24310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Backgrounds</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lead dislodgement is a severe complication in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Inflammation after CIED implantation results in the development of adhesions between lead and tissues, resulting in the lead becoming fixed in the body. In patients with immunosuppressive therapy, however, adhesion is inhibited by anti-inflammatory effects. However, the association between lead dislodgement and immunosuppressive therapy has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lead dislodgement and immunosuppressive therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Hypothesis</h3>\\n \\n <p>We hypothesized that lead dislodgement more frequently occur in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than those without.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 651 consecutive patients who underwent CIED implantation or lead addition (age, 76 ± 11 years; and males, 374 [58%], high voltage device, 121 [19%], lead addition 23 [4%]) were retrospectively enrolled. Immunosuppressive therapy was with regular steroids or immunosuppressants. Lead placement was guided by fluoroscopy, and active fixation leads were used. Restraint of the upper limb by chest tape was performed for 1 week after the procedure. Lead dislodgement was defined as a change in lead position and/or lead failure requiring reoperation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty (3.1%) patients received immunosuppressive therapy. Among these, 15 (2.3%) patients regularly took steroids and 8 (1.2%) took immunosuppressants. Lead dislodgement occurred in 10 (1.5%) patients. Lead dislodgement was more frequent in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than in those without (3 [15%] vs. 7 [1%], <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In patients with CIED implantation or lead addition, lead dislodgement is more frequent in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than in those without.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.24310\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.24310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.24310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Immunosuppressive Therapy on Lead Dislodgement After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation
Backgrounds
Lead dislodgement is a severe complication in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Inflammation after CIED implantation results in the development of adhesions between lead and tissues, resulting in the lead becoming fixed in the body. In patients with immunosuppressive therapy, however, adhesion is inhibited by anti-inflammatory effects. However, the association between lead dislodgement and immunosuppressive therapy has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lead dislodgement and immunosuppressive therapy.
Hypothesis
We hypothesized that lead dislodgement more frequently occur in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than those without.
Methods
In total, 651 consecutive patients who underwent CIED implantation or lead addition (age, 76 ± 11 years; and males, 374 [58%], high voltage device, 121 [19%], lead addition 23 [4%]) were retrospectively enrolled. Immunosuppressive therapy was with regular steroids or immunosuppressants. Lead placement was guided by fluoroscopy, and active fixation leads were used. Restraint of the upper limb by chest tape was performed for 1 week after the procedure. Lead dislodgement was defined as a change in lead position and/or lead failure requiring reoperation.
Results
Twenty (3.1%) patients received immunosuppressive therapy. Among these, 15 (2.3%) patients regularly took steroids and 8 (1.2%) took immunosuppressants. Lead dislodgement occurred in 10 (1.5%) patients. Lead dislodgement was more frequent in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than in those without (3 [15%] vs. 7 [1%], p = 0.003).
Conclusion
In patients with CIED implantation or lead addition, lead dislodgement is more frequent in patients with immunosuppressive therapy than in those without.