颈脊髓损伤后上肢功能障碍严重程度的分类和日常生活自理能力的预测。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spinal cord Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1038/s41393-024-01005-5
Kazumasa Jimbo, Kazuhiro Miyata, Hiroshi Yuine, Kousuke Takahama, Tomohiro Yoshimura, Honoka Shiba, Taichi Yasumori, Naohisa Kikuchi, Hideki Shiraishi
{"title":"颈脊髓损伤后上肢功能障碍严重程度的分类和日常生活自理能力的预测。","authors":"Kazumasa Jimbo, Kazuhiro Miyata, Hiroshi Yuine, Kousuke Takahama, Tomohiro Yoshimura, Honoka Shiba, Taichi Yasumori, Naohisa Kikuchi, Hideki Shiraishi","doi":"10.1038/s41393-024-01005-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prospective observational study. Classification of spinal-cord injury and prediction of independence in activities of daily living (ADL) based on performance evaluations such as upper-limb function have not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to establish a severity classification and calculate cutoff values for independence in ADL using the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) for individuals with cervical spinal-cord injury (CSCI). A spinal-cord injury rehabilitation center in Japan. This study included individuals with subacute CSCI. Collected data included the CUE-T and Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) scores. The severity classification was used for the hierarchical cluster analysis using the CUE-T. The cutoff values of CUE-T scores for independence in ADL were calculated using an adjustment model with logistic regression analysis. The dependent variable was binary (independent/non-independent) for each SCIM III Self-care item, and the independent variable was CUE-T. A total of 71 participants were included in the analysis. The severity of upper-limb dysfunction was classified into four categories using CUE-T. Significant differences in upper-limb function and ADL were observed between clusters. The cutoff values for CUE-T score for independence in ADL ranged from 37 to 91 points. All cutoff values showed good results in the internal validation, sensitivity analysis. This study determined the severity of upper limb function in CSCI and the cutoff values of CUE-T scores for independence in ADL. These results may help set criteria and goals for interventions in the clinical and research fields. None.","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":"62 9","pages":"507-513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-024-01005-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of upper-limb dysfunction severity and prediction of independence in activities of daily living after cervical spinal-cord injury\",\"authors\":\"Kazumasa Jimbo, Kazuhiro Miyata, Hiroshi Yuine, Kousuke Takahama, Tomohiro Yoshimura, Honoka Shiba, Taichi Yasumori, Naohisa Kikuchi, Hideki Shiraishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41393-024-01005-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prospective observational study. Classification of spinal-cord injury and prediction of independence in activities of daily living (ADL) based on performance evaluations such as upper-limb function have not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to establish a severity classification and calculate cutoff values for independence in ADL using the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) for individuals with cervical spinal-cord injury (CSCI). A spinal-cord injury rehabilitation center in Japan. This study included individuals with subacute CSCI. Collected data included the CUE-T and Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) scores. The severity classification was used for the hierarchical cluster analysis using the CUE-T. The cutoff values of CUE-T scores for independence in ADL were calculated using an adjustment model with logistic regression analysis. The dependent variable was binary (independent/non-independent) for each SCIM III Self-care item, and the independent variable was CUE-T. A total of 71 participants were included in the analysis. The severity of upper-limb dysfunction was classified into four categories using CUE-T. Significant differences in upper-limb function and ADL were observed between clusters. The cutoff values for CUE-T score for independence in ADL ranged from 37 to 91 points. All cutoff values showed good results in the internal validation, sensitivity analysis. This study determined the severity of upper limb function in CSCI and the cutoff values of CUE-T scores for independence in ADL. These results may help set criteria and goals for interventions in the clinical and research fields. None.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spinal cord\",\"volume\":\"62 9\",\"pages\":\"507-513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-024-01005-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spinal cord\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-024-01005-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-024-01005-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计研究目的:前瞻性观察研究:基于上肢功能等表现评估对脊髓损伤进行分类并预测日常生活活动(ADL)独立性的研究尚未见报道。因此,本研究旨在使用上肢能力测试(CUE-T)为颈椎脊髓损伤(CSCI)患者建立严重程度分类并计算日常生活自理能力的临界值:研究地点:日本一家脊髓损伤康复中心:研究对象:亚急性 CSCI 患者。收集的数据包括 CUE-T 和脊髓独立性测量 III(SCIM III)评分。严重程度分类采用 CUE-T 进行分层聚类分析。使用逻辑回归分析调整模型计算了CUE-T分数在ADL中独立性的临界值。因变量为 SCIM III 中每个自理项目的二元变量(独立/非独立),自变量为 CUE-T:共有 71 名参与者参与了分析。使用 CUE-T 将上肢功能障碍的严重程度分为四类。不同组别之间的上肢功能和日常活动能力存在显著差异。CUE-T得分的临界值从37分到91分不等。所有临界值在内部验证和敏感性分析中均显示出良好的结果:本研究确定了CSCI患者上肢功能的严重程度以及CUE-T评分在ADL独立性方面的临界值。这些结果可能有助于在临床和研究领域制定干预标准和目标:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classification of upper-limb dysfunction severity and prediction of independence in activities of daily living after cervical spinal-cord injury
Prospective observational study. Classification of spinal-cord injury and prediction of independence in activities of daily living (ADL) based on performance evaluations such as upper-limb function have not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to establish a severity classification and calculate cutoff values for independence in ADL using the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) for individuals with cervical spinal-cord injury (CSCI). A spinal-cord injury rehabilitation center in Japan. This study included individuals with subacute CSCI. Collected data included the CUE-T and Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) scores. The severity classification was used for the hierarchical cluster analysis using the CUE-T. The cutoff values of CUE-T scores for independence in ADL were calculated using an adjustment model with logistic regression analysis. The dependent variable was binary (independent/non-independent) for each SCIM III Self-care item, and the independent variable was CUE-T. A total of 71 participants were included in the analysis. The severity of upper-limb dysfunction was classified into four categories using CUE-T. Significant differences in upper-limb function and ADL were observed between clusters. The cutoff values for CUE-T score for independence in ADL ranged from 37 to 91 points. All cutoff values showed good results in the internal validation, sensitivity analysis. This study determined the severity of upper limb function in CSCI and the cutoff values of CUE-T scores for independence in ADL. These results may help set criteria and goals for interventions in the clinical and research fields. None.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
期刊最新文献
The influencing factors for tracheostomy decannulation after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. "What should a rehabilitation hospital be like?" Priorities and expectations of people with spinal cord injury in Türkiye. The effect of abdominal functional electrical stimulation on blood pressure in people with high level spinal cord injury. Mortality and causes of death of traumatic spinal cord injury in Finland. Correspondence to "Walking improvement in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury with exoskeleton robotic training (WISE): a randomized controlled trial".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1