探索地热发电厂不凝结气体的化学处置方案:Kızıldere地热田(土耳其)案例研究

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Geothermics Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103077
Füsun S. Tut Haklıdır , Raziye Şengün Çetin , Sanem Kılınçarslan
{"title":"探索地热发电厂不凝结气体的化学处置方案:Kızıldere地热田(土耳其)案例研究","authors":"Füsun S. Tut Haklıdır ,&nbsp;Raziye Şengün Çetin ,&nbsp;Sanem Kılınçarslan","doi":"10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Geothermal power plants are among the most important renewable energy power plants owing to their high-capacity factors and integrated utilization possibilities. Currently, these power plants utilize geothermal fluid to generate electricity. Although their emissions are lower than those of conventional power plants, gasses such as CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>S are released into the air from the cooling towers, particularly in flash-type geothermal power plants</p><p>To reduce the emission of CO<sub>2</sub> gas released from geothermal power plants, reinjection studies have mainly been carried out around the world. These types of studies require extensive analysis of underground fracture systems, detailed geosciences, and the reservoir studies. However, these studies are considered risky and expensive for most plant operators because possible changes in underground fracture systems may affect the productivity of geothermal production zones. In terms of the environmental impact, hydrogen sulfide is a more harmful gas than CO<sub>2</sub>. Effective H<sub>2</sub>S removal methods cannot be widely used, except in areas with extremely high concentrations, because they commonly incur significant costs for plant operators. Effective H<sub>2</sub>S removal methods are not widely available except for geothermal sites with high concentrations. The fact that local limit values can be exceeded in geothermal power plants with relatively low H<sub>2</sub>S concentrations, such as geothermal power plants in Türkiye, pushes plant operators to find new low-cost solutions due to high operation costs. For this reason, a treatment method that can be applied at every site and whose cost is not too high has not yet been put forward. However, NaOH is used for this purpose in geothermal fields such as steam-dominated Geyser field to increase the pH values in geothermal wells, which has been producing for a long time.</p><p>In this study, field tests were carried out with five different chemicals and pure water to examine the reduction of non-condensable gasses in a geothermal power plant located in the Kızıldere (Denizli, Türkiye) geothermal field, one of the most important geothermal fields in the world. According to this, the capture of these gasses is technically possible using chemical methods, with a performance of up to 70 % observed in CO<sub>2</sub> gas capture.</p><p>However, although it is possible to capture 70 % of non-condensable gasses with such chemical methods, the consumable cost of the operation is quite high.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55095,"journal":{"name":"Geothermics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring chemical disposal options for non-condensable gasses in geothermal power plants: A case study of Kızıldere geothermal field (Türkiye)\",\"authors\":\"Füsun S. Tut Haklıdır ,&nbsp;Raziye Şengün Çetin ,&nbsp;Sanem Kılınçarslan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Geothermal power plants are among the most important renewable energy power plants owing to their high-capacity factors and integrated utilization possibilities. Currently, these power plants utilize geothermal fluid to generate electricity. Although their emissions are lower than those of conventional power plants, gasses such as CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>S are released into the air from the cooling towers, particularly in flash-type geothermal power plants</p><p>To reduce the emission of CO<sub>2</sub> gas released from geothermal power plants, reinjection studies have mainly been carried out around the world. These types of studies require extensive analysis of underground fracture systems, detailed geosciences, and the reservoir studies. However, these studies are considered risky and expensive for most plant operators because possible changes in underground fracture systems may affect the productivity of geothermal production zones. In terms of the environmental impact, hydrogen sulfide is a more harmful gas than CO<sub>2</sub>. Effective H<sub>2</sub>S removal methods cannot be widely used, except in areas with extremely high concentrations, because they commonly incur significant costs for plant operators. Effective H<sub>2</sub>S removal methods are not widely available except for geothermal sites with high concentrations. The fact that local limit values can be exceeded in geothermal power plants with relatively low H<sub>2</sub>S concentrations, such as geothermal power plants in Türkiye, pushes plant operators to find new low-cost solutions due to high operation costs. For this reason, a treatment method that can be applied at every site and whose cost is not too high has not yet been put forward. However, NaOH is used for this purpose in geothermal fields such as steam-dominated Geyser field to increase the pH values in geothermal wells, which has been producing for a long time.</p><p>In this study, field tests were carried out with five different chemicals and pure water to examine the reduction of non-condensable gasses in a geothermal power plant located in the Kızıldere (Denizli, Türkiye) geothermal field, one of the most important geothermal fields in the world. According to this, the capture of these gasses is technically possible using chemical methods, with a performance of up to 70 % observed in CO<sub>2</sub> gas capture.</p><p>However, although it is possible to capture 70 % of non-condensable gasses with such chemical methods, the consumable cost of the operation is quite high.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geothermics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geothermics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375650524001664\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geothermics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375650524001664","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地热发电厂因其高容量系数和综合利用的可能性而成为最重要的可再生能源发电厂之一。目前,这些发电厂利用地热流体发电。为了减少地热发电厂排放的二氧化碳气体,世界各地主要开展了回注研究。这类研究需要对地下裂缝系统、详细的地球科学和储层研究进行大量分析。然而,由于地下断裂系统可能发生的变化会影响地热生产区的生产率,因此对于大多数发电厂运营商来说,这些研究都被认为是高风险、高成本的。就环境影响而言,硫化氢是比二氧化碳更有害的气体。除浓度极高的地区外,有效的 H2S 清除方法无法广泛使用,因为这些方法通常会给工厂运营商带来巨额成本。除高浓度地热区外,有效的 H2S 去除方法尚未得到广泛应用。在 H2S 浓度相对较低的地热发电厂(如图尔基耶的地热发电厂),当地的限值可能会超标,这一事实迫使发电厂运营商在高昂的运营成本下寻找新的低成本解决方案。因此,目前还没有一种既能适用于所有地点又成本不高的处理方法。本研究使用五种不同的化学试剂和纯水进行了现场测试,以检查位于 Kızıldere(土耳其代尼兹利)地热区(世界上最重要的地热区之一)的地热发电厂中不可冷凝气体的减少情况。据此,利用化学方法捕获这些气体在技术上是可行的,二氧化碳气体捕获的性能高达 70%。然而,尽管利用这种化学方法可以捕获 70% 的非冷凝性气体,但操作的消耗成本相当高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring chemical disposal options for non-condensable gasses in geothermal power plants: A case study of Kızıldere geothermal field (Türkiye)

Geothermal power plants are among the most important renewable energy power plants owing to their high-capacity factors and integrated utilization possibilities. Currently, these power plants utilize geothermal fluid to generate electricity. Although their emissions are lower than those of conventional power plants, gasses such as CO2 and H2S are released into the air from the cooling towers, particularly in flash-type geothermal power plants

To reduce the emission of CO2 gas released from geothermal power plants, reinjection studies have mainly been carried out around the world. These types of studies require extensive analysis of underground fracture systems, detailed geosciences, and the reservoir studies. However, these studies are considered risky and expensive for most plant operators because possible changes in underground fracture systems may affect the productivity of geothermal production zones. In terms of the environmental impact, hydrogen sulfide is a more harmful gas than CO2. Effective H2S removal methods cannot be widely used, except in areas with extremely high concentrations, because they commonly incur significant costs for plant operators. Effective H2S removal methods are not widely available except for geothermal sites with high concentrations. The fact that local limit values can be exceeded in geothermal power plants with relatively low H2S concentrations, such as geothermal power plants in Türkiye, pushes plant operators to find new low-cost solutions due to high operation costs. For this reason, a treatment method that can be applied at every site and whose cost is not too high has not yet been put forward. However, NaOH is used for this purpose in geothermal fields such as steam-dominated Geyser field to increase the pH values in geothermal wells, which has been producing for a long time.

In this study, field tests were carried out with five different chemicals and pure water to examine the reduction of non-condensable gasses in a geothermal power plant located in the Kızıldere (Denizli, Türkiye) geothermal field, one of the most important geothermal fields in the world. According to this, the capture of these gasses is technically possible using chemical methods, with a performance of up to 70 % observed in CO2 gas capture.

However, although it is possible to capture 70 % of non-condensable gasses with such chemical methods, the consumable cost of the operation is quite high.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geothermics
Geothermics 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
237
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geothermics is an international journal devoted to the research and development of geothermal energy. The International Board of Editors of Geothermics, which comprises specialists in the various aspects of geothermal resources, exploration and development, guarantees the balanced, comprehensive view of scientific and technological developments in this promising energy field. It promulgates the state of the art and science of geothermal energy, its exploration and exploitation through a regular exchange of information from all parts of the world. The journal publishes articles dealing with the theory, exploration techniques and all aspects of the utilization of geothermal resources. Geothermics serves as the scientific house, or exchange medium, through which the growing community of geothermal specialists can provide and receive information.
期刊最新文献
Experimental assessment of inter-well reinjection in standing column wells by analysis of transfer functions obtained from non-stationary deconvolution The certainty matrix for fault data and interpretations Investigation of radiogenic heat production in granites of the Goiás Tin Province, Central Brazil Influence of ground source heat exchanger operation modes on multi-borehole mid-deep ground source heat pump system performance Deep thermal state on the southern margin of the Zhangzhou Basin based on the electrical conductivity model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1