{"title":"设计项目中的共同领导和社会物质性:物品与价值的整合","authors":"Miikka J. Lehtonen","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shared leadership has gained momentum in fields ranging from education and healthcare to information technology and sports. Given its collaborative or participatory nature, design practice should be a fertile ground for the emergence of shared leadership. Yet, previous literature on design management and leadership has primarily conceptualized leadership as an individual characteristic. To extend the existing literature, this article presents an autoethnographic exploration of shared leadership from a sociomaterial perspective. It focuses on a design project dealing with remote healthcare solutions and contributes to existing literature on shared leadership and sociomateriality. I clarify how values, individuals, and objects interact over time to evolve, stabilize, and destabilize shared leadership. This finding calls for a more granular understanding of objects. This suggests that objects influence shared leadership not just through their form and development but also by imbuing and reinforcing certain values. The findings also highlight the need to regard design leadership as sociomaterial configurations rather than solely as an individual characteristic. The article concludes by proposing further research avenues and discussing implications for design practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 94-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872624000261/pdfft?md5=990f113d3ce0ffe6a1a374bac0766ef3&pid=1-s2.0-S2405872624000261-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared Leadership and Sociomateriality in Design Projects: Integrating Objects and Values\",\"authors\":\"Miikka J. Lehtonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sheji.2024.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Shared leadership has gained momentum in fields ranging from education and healthcare to information technology and sports. Given its collaborative or participatory nature, design practice should be a fertile ground for the emergence of shared leadership. Yet, previous literature on design management and leadership has primarily conceptualized leadership as an individual characteristic. To extend the existing literature, this article presents an autoethnographic exploration of shared leadership from a sociomaterial perspective. It focuses on a design project dealing with remote healthcare solutions and contributes to existing literature on shared leadership and sociomateriality. I clarify how values, individuals, and objects interact over time to evolve, stabilize, and destabilize shared leadership. This finding calls for a more granular understanding of objects. This suggests that objects influence shared leadership not just through their form and development but also by imbuing and reinforcing certain values. The findings also highlight the need to regard design leadership as sociomaterial configurations rather than solely as an individual characteristic. The article concludes by proposing further research avenues and discussing implications for design practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 94-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872624000261/pdfft?md5=990f113d3ce0ffe6a1a374bac0766ef3&pid=1-s2.0-S2405872624000261-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872624000261\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872624000261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shared Leadership and Sociomateriality in Design Projects: Integrating Objects and Values
Shared leadership has gained momentum in fields ranging from education and healthcare to information technology and sports. Given its collaborative or participatory nature, design practice should be a fertile ground for the emergence of shared leadership. Yet, previous literature on design management and leadership has primarily conceptualized leadership as an individual characteristic. To extend the existing literature, this article presents an autoethnographic exploration of shared leadership from a sociomaterial perspective. It focuses on a design project dealing with remote healthcare solutions and contributes to existing literature on shared leadership and sociomateriality. I clarify how values, individuals, and objects interact over time to evolve, stabilize, and destabilize shared leadership. This finding calls for a more granular understanding of objects. This suggests that objects influence shared leadership not just through their form and development but also by imbuing and reinforcing certain values. The findings also highlight the need to regard design leadership as sociomaterial configurations rather than solely as an individual characteristic. The article concludes by proposing further research avenues and discussing implications for design practice.