阿片类药物长期使用者使用加巴喷丁诺的模式

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Preventive medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108046
Jordan Westra , Mukaila Raji , Jacques Baillargeon , Rajender R. Aparasu , Yong-Fang Kuo
{"title":"阿片类药物长期使用者使用加巴喷丁诺的模式","authors":"Jordan Westra ,&nbsp;Mukaila Raji ,&nbsp;Jacques Baillargeon ,&nbsp;Rajender R. Aparasu ,&nbsp;Yong-Fang Kuo","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Understanding the clinical and demographic profile of patients on gabapentinoids can highlight areas of prescribing disparities, inform clinical practice, and guide future research to optimize effectiveness and safety of gabapentinoids for pain management. We used a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries to examine trends, patterns, and patient-level predictors of gabapentinoid use among long-term opioid users.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a national Medicare sample between 2014 and 2020, we examined factors associated with gabapentinoid use among long-term opioid users. We included Medicare eligible long-term opioid users with no prior gabapentinoid use. The primary outcome was gabapentinoid use after the long-term opioid use episode. Logistic regression was used to test the association with gabapentinoid use for year, age, sex, race/ethnicity, region, Medicare entitlement, low-income status, frailty, pain locations, anxiety, depression, opioid use disorder, and opioid morphine milligrams equivalent.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Gabapentinoid use among long-term opioid users increased from 12.6% in 2014 to 16.8% in 2019 (<em>p</em> &lt; .0001). Factors associated with increased gabapentinoid use were Hispanic ethnicity, back pain, nerve pain, and moderate or high opioid usage. Factors associated with decreased gabapentinoid use were older age and Medicare entitlement due to old age.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Variation of gabapentinoid use by socio-demographics and insurance status indicates opportunities to improve pain management and a need for shared therapeutic decision making informed by discussion between pain patients and providers regarding safety and effectiveness of pain therapies. Our findings underscore the need for future research into the comparative effectiveness and safety of gabapentinoids for non-cancer chronic pain in various subpopulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of gabapentinoid use among long-term opioid users\",\"authors\":\"Jordan Westra ,&nbsp;Mukaila Raji ,&nbsp;Jacques Baillargeon ,&nbsp;Rajender R. Aparasu ,&nbsp;Yong-Fang Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Understanding the clinical and demographic profile of patients on gabapentinoids can highlight areas of prescribing disparities, inform clinical practice, and guide future research to optimize effectiveness and safety of gabapentinoids for pain management. We used a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries to examine trends, patterns, and patient-level predictors of gabapentinoid use among long-term opioid users.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a national Medicare sample between 2014 and 2020, we examined factors associated with gabapentinoid use among long-term opioid users. We included Medicare eligible long-term opioid users with no prior gabapentinoid use. The primary outcome was gabapentinoid use after the long-term opioid use episode. Logistic regression was used to test the association with gabapentinoid use for year, age, sex, race/ethnicity, region, Medicare entitlement, low-income status, frailty, pain locations, anxiety, depression, opioid use disorder, and opioid morphine milligrams equivalent.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Gabapentinoid use among long-term opioid users increased from 12.6% in 2014 to 16.8% in 2019 (<em>p</em> &lt; .0001). Factors associated with increased gabapentinoid use were Hispanic ethnicity, back pain, nerve pain, and moderate or high opioid usage. Factors associated with decreased gabapentinoid use were older age and Medicare entitlement due to old age.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Variation of gabapentinoid use by socio-demographics and insurance status indicates opportunities to improve pain management and a need for shared therapeutic decision making informed by discussion between pain patients and providers regarding safety and effectiveness of pain therapies. Our findings underscore the need for future research into the comparative effectiveness and safety of gabapentinoids for non-cancer chronic pain in various subpopulations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解使用加巴喷丁类药物的患者的临床和人口统计学特征可以突出处方差异的领域,为临床实践提供信息,并指导未来的研究,以优化加巴喷丁类药物治疗疼痛的有效性和安全性。我们利用全国医疗保险受益人样本,研究了长期阿片类药物使用者使用加巴喷丁类药物的趋势、模式和患者层面的预测因素。方法利用 2014 年至 2020 年间的全国医疗保险样本,研究了长期阿片类药物使用者使用加巴喷丁类药物的相关因素。我们的研究对象包括符合医保资格且之前未使用过加巴喷丁类药物的长期阿片类药物使用者。主要结果是在长期使用阿片类药物后使用加巴喷丁胺。采用逻辑回归法检验了年份、年龄、性别、种族/民族、地区、医疗保险待遇、低收入状况、虚弱程度、疼痛部位、焦虑、抑郁、阿片类药物使用障碍和阿片类药物吗啡毫克当量与加巴喷丁胺使用的相关性。结果长期阿片类药物使用者中加巴喷丁胺的使用率从 2014 年的 12.6% 增加到 2019 年的 16.8%(p <.0001)。与加巴喷丁胺使用增加相关的因素包括西班牙裔、背痛、神经痛以及中度或高度阿片类药物使用。与减少使用加巴喷丁类药物相关的因素是年龄较大和因年老而享受医疗保险。结论加巴喷丁类药物的使用因社会人口统计学和保险状况而异,这表明有机会改善疼痛管理,并需要疼痛患者和医疗服务提供者就疼痛疗法的安全性和有效性进行讨论,从而做出共同的治疗决策。我们的研究结果表明,今后有必要对加巴喷丁类药物在不同亚人群中治疗非癌症慢性疼痛的有效性和安全性进行比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patterns of gabapentinoid use among long-term opioid users

Objective

Understanding the clinical and demographic profile of patients on gabapentinoids can highlight areas of prescribing disparities, inform clinical practice, and guide future research to optimize effectiveness and safety of gabapentinoids for pain management. We used a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries to examine trends, patterns, and patient-level predictors of gabapentinoid use among long-term opioid users.

Methods

Using a national Medicare sample between 2014 and 2020, we examined factors associated with gabapentinoid use among long-term opioid users. We included Medicare eligible long-term opioid users with no prior gabapentinoid use. The primary outcome was gabapentinoid use after the long-term opioid use episode. Logistic regression was used to test the association with gabapentinoid use for year, age, sex, race/ethnicity, region, Medicare entitlement, low-income status, frailty, pain locations, anxiety, depression, opioid use disorder, and opioid morphine milligrams equivalent.

Results

Gabapentinoid use among long-term opioid users increased from 12.6% in 2014 to 16.8% in 2019 (p < .0001). Factors associated with increased gabapentinoid use were Hispanic ethnicity, back pain, nerve pain, and moderate or high opioid usage. Factors associated with decreased gabapentinoid use were older age and Medicare entitlement due to old age.

Conclusions

Variation of gabapentinoid use by socio-demographics and insurance status indicates opportunities to improve pain management and a need for shared therapeutic decision making informed by discussion between pain patients and providers regarding safety and effectiveness of pain therapies. Our findings underscore the need for future research into the comparative effectiveness and safety of gabapentinoids for non-cancer chronic pain in various subpopulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Behavior change, health, and health disparities 2024: Smoking and other tobacco use among women and girls. Association between self-reported child maltreatment and risk of hospital-treated infectious diseases in middle-aged and older adults: A UK Biobank cohort study. Fish oil supplementation, genetic susceptibility and risk of new-onset hypertension. Assessing the association between cigarette smoking and blood C-reactive protein levels using restructured cohort data Organized cervical cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of sending invitation letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1