预防性敷料可预防重症监护病房成人患者的骶骨压力损伤:三臂可行性随机对照试验

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103746
Sharon Latimer , Rachel M. Walker , Wendy Chaboyer , Lukman Thalib , Fiona Coyer , Jodie L. Deakin , Brigid M. Gillespie
{"title":"预防性敷料可预防重症监护病房成人患者的骶骨压力损伤:三臂可行性随机对照试验","authors":"Sharon Latimer ,&nbsp;Rachel M. Walker ,&nbsp;Wendy Chaboyer ,&nbsp;Lukman Thalib ,&nbsp;Fiona Coyer ,&nbsp;Jodie L. Deakin ,&nbsp;Brigid M. Gillespie","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pressure injuries in intensive care patients are a safety issue. Specialized foam sacral prophylactic dressings prevent pressure injuries with several products available for clinicians to choose from.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assess the feasibility of conducting a multisite trial to test the effectiveness of two dressings versus usual care in preventing sacral pressure injuries in intensive care patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a three-arm pilot randomized trial design, adult intensive care unit patients at risk for pressure injuries were randomly allocated to the Mepilex® Sacrum dressing, the Allevyn™ Life Sacrum dressing or the control group. Daily pressure injury data were collected including a de-identified sacral photograph, which the blinded outcome assessor used to determine the study end point: a new sacral pressure injury. Pre-determined feasibility criteria were measured in terms of eligibility, recruitment, retention, intervention fidelity and missing data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From May-September 2021, we screened 602 intensive care unit adult patients for eligibility with 93 % (n = 558) excluded. Forty-four (7 %) were eligible, and all were recruited and randomized (100 %). After receipt of the intervention two participants withdrew from the study. Our final sample of 42 participants were randomly allocated to the Mepilex® (n = 12), Allevyn™ (n = 14) or control (n = 16) group. The interventions were delivered as intended and there were 11 (6 %) cases of missing outcome data. Five participants (12 %) developed a sacral pressure injury, four of whom received a sacral dressing.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A larger trial is feasible with minor refinement to the length of stay eligibility criterion.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Prophylactic sacral dressings are recommended for pressure injury prevention. Determining the feasibility of a larger trial to test the effectiveness of two dressings versus usual care in preventing sacral pressure injuries in intensive care patients can provide evidence to aid clinicians, policy makers and managers make value-based care decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 103746"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001319/pdfft?md5=724a061e04a1d0eedeaec639000d7cec&pid=1-s2.0-S0964339724001319-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic dressings to prevent sacral pressure injuries in adult patients admitted to intensive care units: A three-arm feasibility randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Latimer ,&nbsp;Rachel M. Walker ,&nbsp;Wendy Chaboyer ,&nbsp;Lukman Thalib ,&nbsp;Fiona Coyer ,&nbsp;Jodie L. Deakin ,&nbsp;Brigid M. Gillespie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pressure injuries in intensive care patients are a safety issue. Specialized foam sacral prophylactic dressings prevent pressure injuries with several products available for clinicians to choose from.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assess the feasibility of conducting a multisite trial to test the effectiveness of two dressings versus usual care in preventing sacral pressure injuries in intensive care patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a three-arm pilot randomized trial design, adult intensive care unit patients at risk for pressure injuries were randomly allocated to the Mepilex® Sacrum dressing, the Allevyn™ Life Sacrum dressing or the control group. Daily pressure injury data were collected including a de-identified sacral photograph, which the blinded outcome assessor used to determine the study end point: a new sacral pressure injury. Pre-determined feasibility criteria were measured in terms of eligibility, recruitment, retention, intervention fidelity and missing data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From May-September 2021, we screened 602 intensive care unit adult patients for eligibility with 93 % (n = 558) excluded. Forty-four (7 %) were eligible, and all were recruited and randomized (100 %). After receipt of the intervention two participants withdrew from the study. Our final sample of 42 participants were randomly allocated to the Mepilex® (n = 12), Allevyn™ (n = 14) or control (n = 16) group. The interventions were delivered as intended and there were 11 (6 %) cases of missing outcome data. Five participants (12 %) developed a sacral pressure injury, four of whom received a sacral dressing.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A larger trial is feasible with minor refinement to the length of stay eligibility criterion.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Prophylactic sacral dressings are recommended for pressure injury prevention. Determining the feasibility of a larger trial to test the effectiveness of two dressings versus usual care in preventing sacral pressure injuries in intensive care patients can provide evidence to aid clinicians, policy makers and managers make value-based care decisions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103746\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001319/pdfft?md5=724a061e04a1d0eedeaec639000d7cec&pid=1-s2.0-S0964339724001319-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001319\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景重症监护患者的压力损伤是一个安全问题。方法采用三臂试验性随机试验设计,将有压伤风险的成人重症监护病房患者随机分配到 Mepilex® 骶骨敷料、Allevyn™ Life 骶骨敷料或对照组。每天收集压伤数据,包括一张去身份化的骶骨照片,盲法结果评估员利用该照片确定研究终点:新的骶骨压伤。我们从资格、招募、保留、干预忠实度和数据缺失等方面衡量了预先确定的可行性标准。结果从 2021 年 5 月到 9 月,我们筛选了 602 名重症监护室成人患者,其中 93% (n = 558)的患者不符合条件。符合条件的有 44 人(7%),所有参与者都被招募并进行了随机分组(100%)。两名参与者在接受干预后退出了研究。我们最终抽取的 42 名参与者被随机分配到美皮乐®(12 人)、爱乐文™(14 人)或对照组(16 人)。干预措施按计划实施,结果数据有 11 例(6%)缺失。五名参与者(12%)出现了骶骨压伤,其中四人接受了骶骨敷料治疗。结论只要对住院时间资格标准稍作调整,就可以进行更大规模的试验。确定一项更大规模试验的可行性,测试两种敷料与常规护理在预防重症监护患者骶骨压力损伤方面的效果,可以为临床医生、政策制定者和管理者做出基于价值的护理决策提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prophylactic dressings to prevent sacral pressure injuries in adult patients admitted to intensive care units: A three-arm feasibility randomized controlled trial

Background

Pressure injuries in intensive care patients are a safety issue. Specialized foam sacral prophylactic dressings prevent pressure injuries with several products available for clinicians to choose from.

Objectives

Assess the feasibility of conducting a multisite trial to test the effectiveness of two dressings versus usual care in preventing sacral pressure injuries in intensive care patients.

Methods

Using a three-arm pilot randomized trial design, adult intensive care unit patients at risk for pressure injuries were randomly allocated to the Mepilex® Sacrum dressing, the Allevyn™ Life Sacrum dressing or the control group. Daily pressure injury data were collected including a de-identified sacral photograph, which the blinded outcome assessor used to determine the study end point: a new sacral pressure injury. Pre-determined feasibility criteria were measured in terms of eligibility, recruitment, retention, intervention fidelity and missing data.

Results

From May-September 2021, we screened 602 intensive care unit adult patients for eligibility with 93 % (n = 558) excluded. Forty-four (7 %) were eligible, and all were recruited and randomized (100 %). After receipt of the intervention two participants withdrew from the study. Our final sample of 42 participants were randomly allocated to the Mepilex® (n = 12), Allevyn™ (n = 14) or control (n = 16) group. The interventions were delivered as intended and there were 11 (6 %) cases of missing outcome data. Five participants (12 %) developed a sacral pressure injury, four of whom received a sacral dressing.

Conclusions

A larger trial is feasible with minor refinement to the length of stay eligibility criterion.

Implications for practice

Prophylactic sacral dressings are recommended for pressure injury prevention. Determining the feasibility of a larger trial to test the effectiveness of two dressings versus usual care in preventing sacral pressure injuries in intensive care patients can provide evidence to aid clinicians, policy makers and managers make value-based care decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal trajectories of health-related quality of life among critical care survivors: A latent class growth approach Prevalence and risk factors for burnout, missed nursing care, and intention-to-leave the job among intensive care unit and general ward nurses: A cross-sectional study across six European countries in the COVID-19 era Sociodemographic representation in ICU recovery research “I will get out of this” - The patients’ experiences of early mobilisation in intensive care. A hermeneutic study Flexible ICU visiting: Improving family outcomes while navigating implementation challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1