{"title":"用于测定兆伏特光子束吸收剂量的电离室特定光束质量校正因子 (kQ,Q0) 的研究","authors":"John Swanpalmer","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the recent past (Andreo et al., 2020), new ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factors (<em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub>) were published in the literature for the determination of the absorbed dose to water in high energy radiotherapy photon beams. In a previous experimental investigation, made at our laboratory, five various Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers, i.e. Exradin A12, IBA FC65-G, NE-2571, PTW 30011 and PTW 30012, were studied to examine their responses with reference to the determination of the absorbed dose to water in an inter-chamber comparison. In the present work, measurements were made to experimentally study the relation or ratio of the <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors using the five various types of the ionization chambers employed in our previous investigation. In total, nine ionization chambers, two of each type, were included in the present study, with the exception of a single PTW 30011 ionization chamber. The photon beams employed were the 6 MV and the 15 MV beam. The outcomes of this work displayed excellent agreement between the ratio of the ionization chamber-specific <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors, for the ionization chambers utilized, and the corresponding ratio calculated using the published <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors. The discrepancy obtained in these comparisons was within 0.1%, for both the photon beams examined, which is much smaller than the uncertainty associated with the determination of this relationship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor (kQ,Q0) used for absorbed dose determination in megavoltage photon beams\",\"authors\":\"John Swanpalmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the recent past (Andreo et al., 2020), new ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factors (<em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub>) were published in the literature for the determination of the absorbed dose to water in high energy radiotherapy photon beams. In a previous experimental investigation, made at our laboratory, five various Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers, i.e. Exradin A12, IBA FC65-G, NE-2571, PTW 30011 and PTW 30012, were studied to examine their responses with reference to the determination of the absorbed dose to water in an inter-chamber comparison. In the present work, measurements were made to experimentally study the relation or ratio of the <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors using the five various types of the ionization chambers employed in our previous investigation. In total, nine ionization chambers, two of each type, were included in the present study, with the exception of a single PTW 30011 ionization chamber. The photon beams employed were the 6 MV and the 15 MV beam. The outcomes of this work displayed excellent agreement between the ratio of the ionization chamber-specific <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors, for the ionization chambers utilized, and the corresponding ratio calculated using the published <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors. The discrepancy obtained in these comparisons was within 0.1%, for both the photon beams examined, which is much smaller than the uncertainty associated with the determination of this relationship.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724001562\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724001562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigation of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor (kQ,Q0) used for absorbed dose determination in megavoltage photon beams
In the recent past (Andreo et al., 2020), new ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factors (kQ,Q0) were published in the literature for the determination of the absorbed dose to water in high energy radiotherapy photon beams. In a previous experimental investigation, made at our laboratory, five various Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers, i.e. Exradin A12, IBA FC65-G, NE-2571, PTW 30011 and PTW 30012, were studied to examine their responses with reference to the determination of the absorbed dose to water in an inter-chamber comparison. In the present work, measurements were made to experimentally study the relation or ratio of the kQ,Q0 correction factors using the five various types of the ionization chambers employed in our previous investigation. In total, nine ionization chambers, two of each type, were included in the present study, with the exception of a single PTW 30011 ionization chamber. The photon beams employed were the 6 MV and the 15 MV beam. The outcomes of this work displayed excellent agreement between the ratio of the ionization chamber-specific kQ,Q0 correction factors, for the ionization chambers utilized, and the corresponding ratio calculated using the published kQ,Q0 correction factors. The discrepancy obtained in these comparisons was within 0.1%, for both the photon beams examined, which is much smaller than the uncertainty associated with the determination of this relationship.
期刊介绍:
The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal.
Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.