用于测定兆伏特光子束吸收剂量的电离室特定光束质量校正因子 (kQ,Q0) 的研究

IF 1.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Radiation Measurements Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107208
John Swanpalmer
{"title":"用于测定兆伏特光子束吸收剂量的电离室特定光束质量校正因子 (kQ,Q0) 的研究","authors":"John Swanpalmer","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the recent past (Andreo et al., 2020), new ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factors (<em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub>) were published in the literature for the determination of the absorbed dose to water in high energy radiotherapy photon beams. In a previous experimental investigation, made at our laboratory, five various Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers, i.e. Exradin A12, IBA FC65-G, NE-2571, PTW 30011 and PTW 30012, were studied to examine their responses with reference to the determination of the absorbed dose to water in an inter-chamber comparison. In the present work, measurements were made to experimentally study the relation or ratio of the <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors using the five various types of the ionization chambers employed in our previous investigation. In total, nine ionization chambers, two of each type, were included in the present study, with the exception of a single PTW 30011 ionization chamber. The photon beams employed were the 6 MV and the 15 MV beam. The outcomes of this work displayed excellent agreement between the ratio of the ionization chamber-specific <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors, for the ionization chambers utilized, and the corresponding ratio calculated using the published <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors. The discrepancy obtained in these comparisons was within 0.1%, for both the photon beams examined, which is much smaller than the uncertainty associated with the determination of this relationship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor (kQ,Q0) used for absorbed dose determination in megavoltage photon beams\",\"authors\":\"John Swanpalmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the recent past (Andreo et al., 2020), new ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factors (<em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub>) were published in the literature for the determination of the absorbed dose to water in high energy radiotherapy photon beams. In a previous experimental investigation, made at our laboratory, five various Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers, i.e. Exradin A12, IBA FC65-G, NE-2571, PTW 30011 and PTW 30012, were studied to examine their responses with reference to the determination of the absorbed dose to water in an inter-chamber comparison. In the present work, measurements were made to experimentally study the relation or ratio of the <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors using the five various types of the ionization chambers employed in our previous investigation. In total, nine ionization chambers, two of each type, were included in the present study, with the exception of a single PTW 30011 ionization chamber. The photon beams employed were the 6 MV and the 15 MV beam. The outcomes of this work displayed excellent agreement between the ratio of the ionization chamber-specific <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors, for the ionization chambers utilized, and the corresponding ratio calculated using the published <em>k</em><sub><em>Q,Q0</em></sub> correction factors. The discrepancy obtained in these comparisons was within 0.1%, for both the photon beams examined, which is much smaller than the uncertainty associated with the determination of this relationship.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724001562\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724001562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近(Andreo 等人,2020 年),文献中发表了新的电离室特定光束质量校正因子(kQ,Q0),用于确定高能放疗光子束中水的吸收剂量。在我们实验室之前进行的一项实验调查中,研究了五种不同的 Farmer 型圆柱形电离室,即 Exradin A12、IBA FC65-G、NE-2571、PTW 30011 和 PTW 30012,通过室间比较,考察了它们在测定水吸收剂量方面的反应。在本次研究中,我们使用先前调查中使用的五种不同类型的电离室进行了测量,以实验研究 kQ、Q0 校正因子的关系或比率。除一个 PTW 30011 型电离室外,本研究共使用了九个电离室,每个类型两个。采用的光子束为 6 MV 和 15 MV 光束。这项工作的结果表明,所使用电离室的特定 kQ、Q0 修正系数的比率与使用已公布的 kQ、Q0 修正系数计算得出的相应比率非常一致。对于所研究的两种光子束,在这些比较中获得的差异都在 0.1% 以内,远远小于与确定这种关系相关的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factor (kQ,Q0) used for absorbed dose determination in megavoltage photon beams

In the recent past (Andreo et al., 2020), new ionization chamber-specific beam quality correction factors (kQ,Q0) were published in the literature for the determination of the absorbed dose to water in high energy radiotherapy photon beams. In a previous experimental investigation, made at our laboratory, five various Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers, i.e. Exradin A12, IBA FC65-G, NE-2571, PTW 30011 and PTW 30012, were studied to examine their responses with reference to the determination of the absorbed dose to water in an inter-chamber comparison. In the present work, measurements were made to experimentally study the relation or ratio of the kQ,Q0 correction factors using the five various types of the ionization chambers employed in our previous investigation. In total, nine ionization chambers, two of each type, were included in the present study, with the exception of a single PTW 30011 ionization chamber. The photon beams employed were the 6 MV and the 15 MV beam. The outcomes of this work displayed excellent agreement between the ratio of the ionization chamber-specific kQ,Q0 correction factors, for the ionization chambers utilized, and the corresponding ratio calculated using the published kQ,Q0 correction factors. The discrepancy obtained in these comparisons was within 0.1%, for both the photon beams examined, which is much smaller than the uncertainty associated with the determination of this relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Measurements
Radiation Measurements 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal. Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.
期刊最新文献
Accumulation of oxygen interstitial-vacancy pairs under irradiation of corundum single crystals with energetic xenon ions Gel dosimetry: An overview of dosimetry systems and read out methods Evaluation of a portable OSL/IRSL reader for radiation dose assessment of NaCl pellets – In situ individualised screening during R/N emergencies Contributions of cosmic-ray components to the HPGe gamma spectrometer background spectrum within the 0°–45° Zenith angle range Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1