暴力、战火和古代近东青铜时代城市的毁灭

IF 1.1 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY International Journal of Osteoarchaeology Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1002/oa.3318
Piers D. Mitchell, Robin Bendrey
{"title":"暴力、战火和古代近东青铜时代城市的毁灭","authors":"Piers D. Mitchell,&nbsp;Robin Bendrey","doi":"10.1002/oa.3318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The siege and conquest of ancient cities was a popular topic for epic tales and ballads during the Bronze Age and Iron Age. The story of the fall of Troy to the Achaeans (Mycenaeans) is described in Homer's poem the Iliad, composed in the 8th century BCE (Homer, <span>2011</span>). While the details found in the Iliad were mythological, attacks against such cities were very real and likely acted as a plausible framework for the story. When the site of Hisarlik (the most plausible site of Troy) in Turkey was excavated, destruction layers with ash were identified dating to around 1300, 1180, and 1050 BCE (Mac Sweeney, <span>2018</span>, p. 32). Jericho was a late Bronze Age city in Canaan whose destruction by the Israelites was described in the biblical Book of Joshua (Joshua 6: 1–27). However, the destruction layer noted at excavation (dating to around 1400 BCE) does not match the date indicated by historical descriptions of the event (to around 1230 BCE), leading to debates as to the degree to which ancient narratives reflect true events (Kennedy, <span>2023</span>). Jerusalem was the capital of the Kingdom of Judah in the Iron Age. In the 6th century BCE, it was a vasal kingdom of the Assyrians. When Judah failed to pay their agreed tribute, the Babylonian ruler Nebuchadnezzar II invaded in 598–597 BCE and conquered Jerusalem. When they continued to refuse tribute, he returned in 587–586 BCE and sacked the city (Lipschits, <span>2021</span>; Matthews, <span>2018</span>).</p><p>Examples such as these are well known to many today, but countless other ancient cities were never the focus of an epic story that has been handed down through the centuries, and so the surrounding events have been forgotten. Indeed, we remain unsure of the ancient name of many of the excavated early towns and cities in the Near East, so it is quite a challenge to compare information found in ancient written texts with excavation finds at any one particular site.</p><p>In their recently published article in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, Cheryl Anderson presents her study of the human remains recovered from the excavations at Kaman-Kalehöyük in Turkey (Anderson, <span>2024</span>). This ancient town was found to have a destruction layer of ash dating to the mid-18th century BCE. The date falls within what is known as the Assyrian Trading Colonies period or Old Assyrian period (Palmisano, <span>2018</span>). The skeletons of 73 men, women and children were found scattered across the excavated site, distinct from any town burial grounds. All were from areas of the town that show evidence for destruction and burning, and 80% showed charring on their bones. Two individuals have good evidence for sharp force trauma to the skeleton, compatible with bladed weapons. This does suggest that the destruction was due to a violent episode and not just a natural disaster such as an out-of-control town fire or earthquake. However, if the individuals died from weapon injuries during the sack of the town by an invading army, then we might expect to find a much higher number of individuals with such wounds. While wounds to the soft tissues would not be detectable from the analysis of the skeletal remains, it seems unlikely that everyone died from soft tissue wounds alone.</p><p>One intriguing finding is that 33 of the individuals were found in specific rooms. This raises the possibility that the population barricaded themselves into these rooms in order to protect themselves from being attacked by the invading troops. However, their recovery in the ash layer might indicate that they were trapped inside and then died from smoke and heat in the ensuing blaze. Others were found buried together in pits and may represent the disposal of the dead in the days after the sack of the town, possibly by those inhabitants who survived. This scenario vividly brings to life the dark events of Bronze Age warfare and conquest, of raids against neighbouring settlements, and the rise and fall of early kingdoms. While we will never know for sure what happened at the destruction of this town in Anatolia, we do know it must have been a terrifying day for its inhabitants.</p>","PeriodicalId":14179,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oa.3318","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Violence, conflagrations and the destruction of Bronze Age cities in the ancient Near East\",\"authors\":\"Piers D. Mitchell,&nbsp;Robin Bendrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oa.3318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The siege and conquest of ancient cities was a popular topic for epic tales and ballads during the Bronze Age and Iron Age. The story of the fall of Troy to the Achaeans (Mycenaeans) is described in Homer's poem the Iliad, composed in the 8th century BCE (Homer, <span>2011</span>). While the details found in the Iliad were mythological, attacks against such cities were very real and likely acted as a plausible framework for the story. When the site of Hisarlik (the most plausible site of Troy) in Turkey was excavated, destruction layers with ash were identified dating to around 1300, 1180, and 1050 BCE (Mac Sweeney, <span>2018</span>, p. 32). Jericho was a late Bronze Age city in Canaan whose destruction by the Israelites was described in the biblical Book of Joshua (Joshua 6: 1–27). However, the destruction layer noted at excavation (dating to around 1400 BCE) does not match the date indicated by historical descriptions of the event (to around 1230 BCE), leading to debates as to the degree to which ancient narratives reflect true events (Kennedy, <span>2023</span>). Jerusalem was the capital of the Kingdom of Judah in the Iron Age. In the 6th century BCE, it was a vasal kingdom of the Assyrians. When Judah failed to pay their agreed tribute, the Babylonian ruler Nebuchadnezzar II invaded in 598–597 BCE and conquered Jerusalem. When they continued to refuse tribute, he returned in 587–586 BCE and sacked the city (Lipschits, <span>2021</span>; Matthews, <span>2018</span>).</p><p>Examples such as these are well known to many today, but countless other ancient cities were never the focus of an epic story that has been handed down through the centuries, and so the surrounding events have been forgotten. Indeed, we remain unsure of the ancient name of many of the excavated early towns and cities in the Near East, so it is quite a challenge to compare information found in ancient written texts with excavation finds at any one particular site.</p><p>In their recently published article in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, Cheryl Anderson presents her study of the human remains recovered from the excavations at Kaman-Kalehöyük in Turkey (Anderson, <span>2024</span>). This ancient town was found to have a destruction layer of ash dating to the mid-18th century BCE. The date falls within what is known as the Assyrian Trading Colonies period or Old Assyrian period (Palmisano, <span>2018</span>). The skeletons of 73 men, women and children were found scattered across the excavated site, distinct from any town burial grounds. All were from areas of the town that show evidence for destruction and burning, and 80% showed charring on their bones. Two individuals have good evidence for sharp force trauma to the skeleton, compatible with bladed weapons. This does suggest that the destruction was due to a violent episode and not just a natural disaster such as an out-of-control town fire or earthquake. However, if the individuals died from weapon injuries during the sack of the town by an invading army, then we might expect to find a much higher number of individuals with such wounds. While wounds to the soft tissues would not be detectable from the analysis of the skeletal remains, it seems unlikely that everyone died from soft tissue wounds alone.</p><p>One intriguing finding is that 33 of the individuals were found in specific rooms. This raises the possibility that the population barricaded themselves into these rooms in order to protect themselves from being attacked by the invading troops. However, their recovery in the ash layer might indicate that they were trapped inside and then died from smoke and heat in the ensuing blaze. Others were found buried together in pits and may represent the disposal of the dead in the days after the sack of the town, possibly by those inhabitants who survived. This scenario vividly brings to life the dark events of Bronze Age warfare and conquest, of raids against neighbouring settlements, and the rise and fall of early kingdoms. While we will never know for sure what happened at the destruction of this town in Anatolia, we do know it must have been a terrifying day for its inhabitants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oa.3318\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.3318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.3318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在青铜时代和铁器时代,围攻和征服古代城市是史诗故事和民谣的热门话题。荷马创作于公元前 8 世纪的诗歌《伊利亚特》(Homer, 2011)描述了特洛伊城被阿喀亚人(迈锡尼人)攻陷的故事。虽然《伊利亚特》中的细节是神话传说,但对这些城市的攻击是非常真实的,很可能成为故事可信的框架。在挖掘土耳其的希萨尔利克遗址(最可信的特洛伊遗址)时,发现了公元前 1300 年、1180 年和 1050 年左右带有灰烬的破坏层(Mac Sweeney,2018 年,第 32 页)。耶利哥是青铜时代晚期迦南的一座城市,《圣经-约书亚记》(约书亚 6:1-27)中描述了以色列人对它的破坏。然而,发掘时发现的毁灭层(可追溯到公元前 1400 年左右)与该事件的历史描述(可追溯到公元前 1230 年左右)所显示的日期并不一致,这导致了关于古代叙述在多大程度上反映了真实事件的争论(Kennedy,2023 年)。耶路撒冷是铁器时代犹大王国的首都。公元前 6 世纪,它是亚述人的一个附属王国。公元前 598-597 年,巴比伦统治者尼布甲尼撒二世入侵耶路撒冷,并征服了耶路撒冷。当他们继续拒绝进贡时,尼布甲尼撒二世于公元前 587-586 年卷土重来,洗劫了这座城市(Lipschits,2021 年;Matthews,2018 年)。事实上,我们仍然无法确定近东许多已发掘的早期城镇和城市的古代名称,因此,将古代书面文本中的信息与任何一个特定遗址的发掘发现进行比较都是一项相当大的挑战。在最近发表于《国际骨考古学杂志》(International Journal of Osteoarchaeology)的文章中,谢丽尔-安德森(Cheryl Anderson)介绍了她对土耳其卡曼-卡莱霍裕克(Kaman-Kalehöyük)发掘出土的人类遗骸的研究(安德森,2024 年)。该古镇被发现有一个灰烬破坏层,可追溯到公元前 18 世纪中叶。这个年代属于所谓的亚述贸易殖民时期或旧亚述时期(Palmisano,2018 年)。73具男人、女人和儿童的骸骨散布在发掘现场,与任何城镇墓地都不同。所有这些骸骨都来自有被破坏和焚烧迹象的城镇地区,其中 80% 的骸骨上有烧焦的痕迹。有两个人的骨骼上有明显的锐器伤痕,这与带刃武器相符。这确实表明,破坏是由暴力事件造成的,而不仅仅是自然灾害,如失控的城镇火灾或地震。然而,如果这些人是在城镇被入侵军队洗劫时死于武器伤害,那么我们可能会发现这类伤口的人数要多得多。虽然软组织上的伤口无法从骨骼遗骸的分析中检测出来,但似乎不可能每个人都仅仅死于软组织伤口。一个耐人寻味的发现是,有 33 人是在特定的房间里被发现的,这就提出了一种可能性,即人们把自己关在这些房间里,以保护自己免受入侵部队的攻击。然而,他们在灰烬层中被发现可能表明,他们被困在里面,然后在随后的大火中死于烟雾和高温。还有一些人被发现一起埋在坑里,可能是在城镇被洗劫后的日子里,幸存下来的居民对死者进行的处理。这一场景生动地展现了青铜时代战争和征服、对邻近定居点的袭击以及早期王国兴衰的黑暗事件。虽然我们永远无法确定安纳托利亚的这座城镇被摧毁时发生了什么,但我们知道,对于居民来说,那一定是可怕的一天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Violence, conflagrations and the destruction of Bronze Age cities in the ancient Near East

The siege and conquest of ancient cities was a popular topic for epic tales and ballads during the Bronze Age and Iron Age. The story of the fall of Troy to the Achaeans (Mycenaeans) is described in Homer's poem the Iliad, composed in the 8th century BCE (Homer, 2011). While the details found in the Iliad were mythological, attacks against such cities were very real and likely acted as a plausible framework for the story. When the site of Hisarlik (the most plausible site of Troy) in Turkey was excavated, destruction layers with ash were identified dating to around 1300, 1180, and 1050 BCE (Mac Sweeney, 2018, p. 32). Jericho was a late Bronze Age city in Canaan whose destruction by the Israelites was described in the biblical Book of Joshua (Joshua 6: 1–27). However, the destruction layer noted at excavation (dating to around 1400 BCE) does not match the date indicated by historical descriptions of the event (to around 1230 BCE), leading to debates as to the degree to which ancient narratives reflect true events (Kennedy, 2023). Jerusalem was the capital of the Kingdom of Judah in the Iron Age. In the 6th century BCE, it was a vasal kingdom of the Assyrians. When Judah failed to pay their agreed tribute, the Babylonian ruler Nebuchadnezzar II invaded in 598–597 BCE and conquered Jerusalem. When they continued to refuse tribute, he returned in 587–586 BCE and sacked the city (Lipschits, 2021; Matthews, 2018).

Examples such as these are well known to many today, but countless other ancient cities were never the focus of an epic story that has been handed down through the centuries, and so the surrounding events have been forgotten. Indeed, we remain unsure of the ancient name of many of the excavated early towns and cities in the Near East, so it is quite a challenge to compare information found in ancient written texts with excavation finds at any one particular site.

In their recently published article in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, Cheryl Anderson presents her study of the human remains recovered from the excavations at Kaman-Kalehöyük in Turkey (Anderson, 2024). This ancient town was found to have a destruction layer of ash dating to the mid-18th century BCE. The date falls within what is known as the Assyrian Trading Colonies period or Old Assyrian period (Palmisano, 2018). The skeletons of 73 men, women and children were found scattered across the excavated site, distinct from any town burial grounds. All were from areas of the town that show evidence for destruction and burning, and 80% showed charring on their bones. Two individuals have good evidence for sharp force trauma to the skeleton, compatible with bladed weapons. This does suggest that the destruction was due to a violent episode and not just a natural disaster such as an out-of-control town fire or earthquake. However, if the individuals died from weapon injuries during the sack of the town by an invading army, then we might expect to find a much higher number of individuals with such wounds. While wounds to the soft tissues would not be detectable from the analysis of the skeletal remains, it seems unlikely that everyone died from soft tissue wounds alone.

One intriguing finding is that 33 of the individuals were found in specific rooms. This raises the possibility that the population barricaded themselves into these rooms in order to protect themselves from being attacked by the invading troops. However, their recovery in the ash layer might indicate that they were trapped inside and then died from smoke and heat in the ensuing blaze. Others were found buried together in pits and may represent the disposal of the dead in the days after the sack of the town, possibly by those inhabitants who survived. This scenario vividly brings to life the dark events of Bronze Age warfare and conquest, of raids against neighbouring settlements, and the rise and fall of early kingdoms. While we will never know for sure what happened at the destruction of this town in Anatolia, we do know it must have been a terrifying day for its inhabitants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: The aim of the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology is to provide a forum for the publication of papers dealing with all aspects of the study of human and animal bones from archaeological contexts. The journal will publish original papers dealing with human or animal bone research from any area of the world. It will also publish short papers which give important preliminary observations from work in progress and it will publish book reviews. All papers will be subject to peer review. The journal will be aimed principally towards all those with a professional interest in the study of human and animal bones. This includes archaeologists, anthropologists, human and animal bone specialists, palaeopathologists and medical historians.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The role of TV documentaries to disseminate osteoarchaeology more widely: The good, the bad, and the ugly Reading between the lines: A study of Harris lines in Middle Holocene foragers of the Cis-Baikal A skeletal dysplasia leading to a perinatal death in 17th–19th century Lisbon, Portugal An Upper Paleolithic horse mandible with an embedded lithic projectile: Insights into 16,500 cal BP hunting strategies through a unique case of bone injury from Cantabrian Spain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1