模型液:对分层树脂复合修复体的粘结强度、颜色和抗染色性的影响。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Bárbara S Mello, Waldemir F Vieira-Junior, Roberta T Basting, Fabiana M G França, Cecilia P Turssi
{"title":"模型液:对分层树脂复合修复体的粘结强度、颜色和抗染色性的影响。","authors":"Bárbara S Mello, Waldemir F Vieira-Junior, Roberta T Basting, Fabiana M G França, Cecilia P Turssi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of filled and unfilled modeler liquids on the cohesive strength and color stability when applied in between the resin composite layers in the stratification technique and on the uppermost surface layer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the cohesive strength test (n= 10), 30 cylindrical samples were packed into a Teflon mold (6x2 mm) in 2 mm increments. Firstly, a dentin-shade resin composite (Empress Direct) was placed, followed by the accommodation of a body-shade resin composite (Filtek Z350 XT) and an enamel-shade resin composite (Estelite Omega). Before photoactivation of each increment, an unfilled (Signum Liquid) or filled (Modeling Resin) modeler liquid was applied between the first and second layers and on the uppermost surface layer. The control group (n= 10) did not receive modeler liquid. Cohesive strength was measured in a universal testing machine. For the color test (n= 10), the other 30 samples were fabricated for the cohesive strength test, except for the difference in the diameter (6x6 mm). Before and after the staining of the samples, color was measured using the CIEL*a*b* system with a spectrophotometer (EasyShade). Data were submitted to ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, or Mann-Whitney test (α= 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Modeler liquids significantly increased cohesive strength (P= 0.008), while ΔEab (P= 0.003) and ΔE₀₀ (P= 0.005) values presented significantly lower changes for the groups that received modeler liquids, with no significant difference between unfilled and filled modeler liquids.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Apart from increasing the interfacial strength of stratified restorations, modeler liquids minimized staining.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 3","pages":"154-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeler liquids: Effect on the cohesive strength, color and staining resistance of stratified resin composite restorations.\",\"authors\":\"Bárbara S Mello, Waldemir F Vieira-Junior, Roberta T Basting, Fabiana M G França, Cecilia P Turssi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of filled and unfilled modeler liquids on the cohesive strength and color stability when applied in between the resin composite layers in the stratification technique and on the uppermost surface layer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the cohesive strength test (n= 10), 30 cylindrical samples were packed into a Teflon mold (6x2 mm) in 2 mm increments. Firstly, a dentin-shade resin composite (Empress Direct) was placed, followed by the accommodation of a body-shade resin composite (Filtek Z350 XT) and an enamel-shade resin composite (Estelite Omega). Before photoactivation of each increment, an unfilled (Signum Liquid) or filled (Modeling Resin) modeler liquid was applied between the first and second layers and on the uppermost surface layer. The control group (n= 10) did not receive modeler liquid. Cohesive strength was measured in a universal testing machine. For the color test (n= 10), the other 30 samples were fabricated for the cohesive strength test, except for the difference in the diameter (6x6 mm). Before and after the staining of the samples, color was measured using the CIEL*a*b* system with a spectrophotometer (EasyShade). Data were submitted to ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, or Mann-Whitney test (α= 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Modeler liquids significantly increased cohesive strength (P= 0.008), while ΔEab (P= 0.003) and ΔE₀₀ (P= 0.005) values presented significantly lower changes for the groups that received modeler liquids, with no significant difference between unfilled and filled modeler liquids.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Apart from increasing the interfacial strength of stratified restorations, modeler liquids minimized staining.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"154-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估在分层技术中树脂复合材料层之间和最上层表面涂抹填充和未填充模型液对内聚强度和颜色稳定性的影响:在内聚强度测试中(n= 10),将 30 个圆柱形样品以 2 毫米为单位装入特氟隆模具(6x2 毫米)。首先放入牙本质色树脂复合材料(Empress Direct),然后放入体色树脂复合材料(Filtek Z350 XT)和釉色树脂复合材料(Estelite Omega)。在每个增量的光激活之前,在第一层和第二层之间以及最上层表面涂上未填充的(Signum Liquid)或填充的(Modeling Resin)模型液。对照组(10 人)不使用模型液。在万能试验机上测量粘合强度。对于染色测试(n= 10),除了直径(6x6 毫米)不同外,其他 30 个样品都是用于内聚强度测试的。在样品染色前后,使用 CIEL*a*b* 系统和分光光度计(EasyShade)测量颜色。数据进行方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis 检验或 Mann-Whitney 检验(α= 5%):结果:模型液明显增加了内聚强度(P= 0.008),而接受模型液的组的ΔEab(P= 0.003)和ΔE₀₀(P= 0.005)值变化明显较小,未填充模型液和填充模型液之间无明显差异:临床意义:除了能提高分层修复体的界面强度外,模型液还能最大限度地减少染色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeler liquids: Effect on the cohesive strength, color and staining resistance of stratified resin composite restorations.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of filled and unfilled modeler liquids on the cohesive strength and color stability when applied in between the resin composite layers in the stratification technique and on the uppermost surface layer.

Methods: For the cohesive strength test (n= 10), 30 cylindrical samples were packed into a Teflon mold (6x2 mm) in 2 mm increments. Firstly, a dentin-shade resin composite (Empress Direct) was placed, followed by the accommodation of a body-shade resin composite (Filtek Z350 XT) and an enamel-shade resin composite (Estelite Omega). Before photoactivation of each increment, an unfilled (Signum Liquid) or filled (Modeling Resin) modeler liquid was applied between the first and second layers and on the uppermost surface layer. The control group (n= 10) did not receive modeler liquid. Cohesive strength was measured in a universal testing machine. For the color test (n= 10), the other 30 samples were fabricated for the cohesive strength test, except for the difference in the diameter (6x6 mm). Before and after the staining of the samples, color was measured using the CIEL*a*b* system with a spectrophotometer (EasyShade). Data were submitted to ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, or Mann-Whitney test (α= 5%).

Results: Modeler liquids significantly increased cohesive strength (P= 0.008), while ΔEab (P= 0.003) and ΔE₀₀ (P= 0.005) values presented significantly lower changes for the groups that received modeler liquids, with no significant difference between unfilled and filled modeler liquids.

Clinical significance: Apart from increasing the interfacial strength of stratified restorations, modeler liquids minimized staining.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
期刊最新文献
Two-year clinical performance of an alkasite direct restorative material in Class I and II cavities without using an adhesive resin: A prospective single-arm clinical trial. Assessment of correlation between the Modified Schirmer Test and unstimulated salivary flow testing. Biofilm attachment and mineralizing potential of contemporary restorative materials. Color match and stability of single-shade resin-based composites before and after artificial aging. Denture biofilm increases respiratory diseases in the elderly. A mini-review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1