Şeyma N Balci, Neslihan Tekçe, Safa Tuncer, Mustafa Demirci
{"title":"不同深边缘隆起方法对 CAD-CAM 修复体断裂强度的影响。","authors":"Şeyma N Balci, Neslihan Tekçe, Safa Tuncer, Mustafa Demirci","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of two resin composites (with different viscosities) and the elevation amount on fracture strength and fracture behavior of molars with and without deep margin elevations (DME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>70 extracted, caries-free human molars were selected. All teeth were prepared as MOD onlay cavities with a margin 2 mm below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) on the mesial and buccal sides and 2 mm above the CEJ on the distal side. The teeth were divided into two groups according to the type of resin composite used in margin elevation, elevated with flowable composite (Universal Flo) or condensable composite (G-Aenial Posterior). These two groups were further subdivided into subgroups in which the elevation was 2, 3, or 4 mm, and a control group in which the non-elevated indirect restoration was directly bonded to the subgingival margin, making a total of seven groups (n= 10). After elevations, the restorations were completed using a nanoceramic CAD-CAM block (Cerasmart A3 HT) and as adhesive cement, G-Cem Link Force. Static force was applied to the restored teeth using a universal testing machine at an angle of 15° until fracture occurred. Fracture strength values were recorded, and fracture types were examined under 6x magnification. One-way ANOVA was carried out to determine the effect of DME on the fracture strength. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to investigate main and interaction effects of the material type used in the elevation and the amount of elevation made on the fracture strength (P< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using flowable or condensable composite as elevation material did not affect the fracture strength of CAD-CAM restorations. Flowable and condensable composites of 2, 3, or 4 mm did not significantly affect fracture strength values for either material. Specimen margins with and without elevation exhibited similar fracture strength values. The type of material used in the elevation and the amount did not affect the fracture strength of teeth.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The deep margin elevation technique for teeth with carious lesions extending subgingivally, may be useful in routine practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 3","pages":"115-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of different deep margin elevation methods on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM restorations.\",\"authors\":\"Şeyma N Balci, Neslihan Tekçe, Safa Tuncer, Mustafa Demirci\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of two resin composites (with different viscosities) and the elevation amount on fracture strength and fracture behavior of molars with and without deep margin elevations (DME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>70 extracted, caries-free human molars were selected. All teeth were prepared as MOD onlay cavities with a margin 2 mm below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) on the mesial and buccal sides and 2 mm above the CEJ on the distal side. The teeth were divided into two groups according to the type of resin composite used in margin elevation, elevated with flowable composite (Universal Flo) or condensable composite (G-Aenial Posterior). These two groups were further subdivided into subgroups in which the elevation was 2, 3, or 4 mm, and a control group in which the non-elevated indirect restoration was directly bonded to the subgingival margin, making a total of seven groups (n= 10). After elevations, the restorations were completed using a nanoceramic CAD-CAM block (Cerasmart A3 HT) and as adhesive cement, G-Cem Link Force. Static force was applied to the restored teeth using a universal testing machine at an angle of 15° until fracture occurred. Fracture strength values were recorded, and fracture types were examined under 6x magnification. One-way ANOVA was carried out to determine the effect of DME on the fracture strength. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to investigate main and interaction effects of the material type used in the elevation and the amount of elevation made on the fracture strength (P< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using flowable or condensable composite as elevation material did not affect the fracture strength of CAD-CAM restorations. Flowable and condensable composites of 2, 3, or 4 mm did not significantly affect fracture strength values for either material. Specimen margins with and without elevation exhibited similar fracture strength values. The type of material used in the elevation and the amount did not affect the fracture strength of teeth.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The deep margin elevation technique for teeth with carious lesions extending subgingivally, may be useful in routine practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"115-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估两种树脂复合材料(粘度不同)和隆起量对有深边缘隆起(DME)和无深边缘隆起(DME)磨牙的断裂强度和断裂行为的影响。方法:选取 70 颗拔除的无龋磨牙,将其制作成 MOD 嵌体龋洞,边缘在中侧和颊侧低于牙本质-釉质交界处(CEJ)2 毫米,远侧高于 CEJ 2 毫米。根据边缘抬高所用树脂复合材料的类型,这些牙齿被分为两组,抬高用的是可流动复合材料(Universal Flo)或可凝结复合材料(G-Aenial Posterior)。这两组又进一步细分为边缘抬高 2 毫米、3 毫米或 4 毫米的子组,以及将未抬高的间接修复体直接粘接到龈下边缘的对照组,总共分为七组(n= 10)。抬高后,使用纳米陶瓷 CAD-CAM 块(Cerasmart A3 HT)和粘接剂 G-Cem Link Force 完成修复。使用万能试验机以 15° 的角度对修复后的牙齿施加静态力,直至发生断裂。记录断裂强度值,并在 6 倍放大镜下检查断裂类型。进行单因素方差分析以确定二甲胺对断裂强度的影响。此外,还进行了双向方差分析,以研究加高所用材料类型和加高量对断裂强度的主效应和交互效应(P< 0.05):结果:使用可流动或可凝结复合材料作为隆起材料不会影响CAD-CAM修复体的断裂强度。2、3或4毫米的可流动和可凝结复合材料对两种材料的断裂强度值均无明显影响。带有和不带有隆起的试样边缘显示出相似的断裂强度值。垫高材料的类型和用量对牙齿的断裂强度没有影响:临床意义:对于龈下延伸的龋坏牙齿,深边缘隆起技术在日常实践中可能是有用的。
The effect of different deep margin elevation methods on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM restorations.
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of two resin composites (with different viscosities) and the elevation amount on fracture strength and fracture behavior of molars with and without deep margin elevations (DME).
Methods: 70 extracted, caries-free human molars were selected. All teeth were prepared as MOD onlay cavities with a margin 2 mm below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) on the mesial and buccal sides and 2 mm above the CEJ on the distal side. The teeth were divided into two groups according to the type of resin composite used in margin elevation, elevated with flowable composite (Universal Flo) or condensable composite (G-Aenial Posterior). These two groups were further subdivided into subgroups in which the elevation was 2, 3, or 4 mm, and a control group in which the non-elevated indirect restoration was directly bonded to the subgingival margin, making a total of seven groups (n= 10). After elevations, the restorations were completed using a nanoceramic CAD-CAM block (Cerasmart A3 HT) and as adhesive cement, G-Cem Link Force. Static force was applied to the restored teeth using a universal testing machine at an angle of 15° until fracture occurred. Fracture strength values were recorded, and fracture types were examined under 6x magnification. One-way ANOVA was carried out to determine the effect of DME on the fracture strength. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to investigate main and interaction effects of the material type used in the elevation and the amount of elevation made on the fracture strength (P< 0.05).
Results: Using flowable or condensable composite as elevation material did not affect the fracture strength of CAD-CAM restorations. Flowable and condensable composites of 2, 3, or 4 mm did not significantly affect fracture strength values for either material. Specimen margins with and without elevation exhibited similar fracture strength values. The type of material used in the elevation and the amount did not affect the fracture strength of teeth.
Clinical significance: The deep margin elevation technique for teeth with carious lesions extending subgingivally, may be useful in routine practice.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.