Victoria R Votaw, Matthew R Pearson, Henry R Kranzler, Corey R Roos, Elizabeth A Yeater, Katie Witkiewitz
{"title":"比较奖励性饮酒和解脱性饮酒测量方法的心理测量特性。","authors":"Victoria R Votaw, Matthew R Pearson, Henry R Kranzler, Corey R Roos, Elizabeth A Yeater, Katie Witkiewitz","doi":"10.1037/pha0000716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous work examining the extent to which individuals seek alcohol to enhance positive experiences (reward drinking) or relieve aversive states (relief drinking) has shown that reward/relief drinking predicts response to naltrexone and acamprosate treatment for alcohol use disorder. Yet, various measures of reward/relief drinking have been used in prior research, and the comparative psychometric properties of these measures are unknown. Evaluating and comparing the psychometric properties of these reward/relief drinking measures could identify measures with the most promise for translating precision medicine findings to clinical practice. In a community sample of 65 individuals with heavy/hazardous alcohol use on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, we showed good internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity for theoretically aligned measures (e.g., reward drinking and reward responsiveness, relief drinking and depression/anxiety symptoms) of the reward and relief subscales across the six measures. We then used ecological momentary assessment to determine whether reward and relief drinking subscales predicted within-person associations between contextual factors of interest (e.g., negative affect, positive affect, distress intolerance, physical pain, hangover symptoms, social drinking situations, alcohol cues) and same-moment alcohol craving. All six measures demonstrated limited predictive validity for alcohol craving contexts in daily life as assessed via ecological momentary assessment. Despite these findings, reward and relief drinking measures show good reliability and concurrent validity and previously demonstrated clinical utility for predicting response to alcohol use disorder treatments, including naltrexone. Future research should aim to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the association between responses to reward/relief drinking measures and pharmacotherapy outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the psychometric properties of reward and relief drinking measures.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria R Votaw, Matthew R Pearson, Henry R Kranzler, Corey R Roos, Elizabeth A Yeater, Katie Witkiewitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pha0000716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous work examining the extent to which individuals seek alcohol to enhance positive experiences (reward drinking) or relieve aversive states (relief drinking) has shown that reward/relief drinking predicts response to naltrexone and acamprosate treatment for alcohol use disorder. Yet, various measures of reward/relief drinking have been used in prior research, and the comparative psychometric properties of these measures are unknown. Evaluating and comparing the psychometric properties of these reward/relief drinking measures could identify measures with the most promise for translating precision medicine findings to clinical practice. In a community sample of 65 individuals with heavy/hazardous alcohol use on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, we showed good internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity for theoretically aligned measures (e.g., reward drinking and reward responsiveness, relief drinking and depression/anxiety symptoms) of the reward and relief subscales across the six measures. We then used ecological momentary assessment to determine whether reward and relief drinking subscales predicted within-person associations between contextual factors of interest (e.g., negative affect, positive affect, distress intolerance, physical pain, hangover symptoms, social drinking situations, alcohol cues) and same-moment alcohol craving. All six measures demonstrated limited predictive validity for alcohol craving contexts in daily life as assessed via ecological momentary assessment. Despite these findings, reward and relief drinking measures show good reliability and concurrent validity and previously demonstrated clinical utility for predicting response to alcohol use disorder treatments, including naltrexone. Future research should aim to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the association between responses to reward/relief drinking measures and pharmacotherapy outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000716\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以前的研究曾对个体寻求酒精以增强积极体验(奖励性饮酒)或缓解厌恶状态(解脱性饮酒)的程度进行过调查,结果表明奖励性/解脱性饮酒可预测对纳曲酮和阿坎酸治疗酒精使用障碍的反应。然而,先前的研究中使用了多种奖励/解脱饮酒的测量方法,而这些测量方法的心理测量学特性比较尚不清楚。评估和比较这些奖赏/解脱饮酒测量方法的心理测量学特性,可以找出最有希望将精准医学研究成果转化为临床实践的测量方法。在一个由 65 名重度/严重饮酒者组成的社区样本中,我们通过酒精使用障碍鉴定测试,对六种测量方法中的奖励和解脱分量表(如奖励饮酒和奖励反应性、解脱饮酒和抑郁/焦虑症状)进行了测试,结果表明这些测量方法具有良好的内部一致性可靠性、重测可靠性和理论一致性和并发有效性。然后,我们使用生态瞬间评估来确定奖赏和解脱性饮酒子量表是否能预测相关情境因素(如消极情绪、积极情绪、苦恼不耐、身体疼痛、宿醉症状、社交饮酒情境、酒精线索)与同时刻酒精渴求之间的人际关联。通过生态瞬间评估,所有六种测量方法对日常生活中酒精渴求情境的预测有效性都很有限。尽管有这些发现,但奖励性和解脱性饮酒测量结果显示出了良好的可靠性和并发有效性,并在预测对酒精使用障碍治疗(包括纳曲酮)的反应方面显示出了临床实用性。未来的研究应旨在阐明奖励/解脱饮酒测量反应与药物治疗结果之间的关联机制。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
Comparing the psychometric properties of reward and relief drinking measures.
Previous work examining the extent to which individuals seek alcohol to enhance positive experiences (reward drinking) or relieve aversive states (relief drinking) has shown that reward/relief drinking predicts response to naltrexone and acamprosate treatment for alcohol use disorder. Yet, various measures of reward/relief drinking have been used in prior research, and the comparative psychometric properties of these measures are unknown. Evaluating and comparing the psychometric properties of these reward/relief drinking measures could identify measures with the most promise for translating precision medicine findings to clinical practice. In a community sample of 65 individuals with heavy/hazardous alcohol use on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, we showed good internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity for theoretically aligned measures (e.g., reward drinking and reward responsiveness, relief drinking and depression/anxiety symptoms) of the reward and relief subscales across the six measures. We then used ecological momentary assessment to determine whether reward and relief drinking subscales predicted within-person associations between contextual factors of interest (e.g., negative affect, positive affect, distress intolerance, physical pain, hangover symptoms, social drinking situations, alcohol cues) and same-moment alcohol craving. All six measures demonstrated limited predictive validity for alcohol craving contexts in daily life as assessed via ecological momentary assessment. Despite these findings, reward and relief drinking measures show good reliability and concurrent validity and previously demonstrated clinical utility for predicting response to alcohol use disorder treatments, including naltrexone. Future research should aim to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the association between responses to reward/relief drinking measures and pharmacotherapy outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.