创造力与情感:以人为本的分析

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102481
Zorana Ivcevic , Shengjie Lin , Xiaochen Liu , Marc Brackett
{"title":"创造力与情感:以人为本的分析","authors":"Zorana Ivcevic ,&nbsp;Shengjie Lin ,&nbsp;Xiaochen Liu ,&nbsp;Marc Brackett","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined the relationship between affect and creative behavior in a national sample of U.S. workers across industries (N = 12,743). Affect was assessed using open-ended questions and emotion rating scales. Those who spontaneously described only negative affect at work showed less creative behavior than those who used only positive terms (moderate effect size). Differences between those who described mixed and positive only affect were small. Examining ratings of affect frequency, we identified four profiles of positive and negative activated affect (high positive/low negative, low positive/high negative, high positive/high negative, low positive/low negative activated affect). Creative behavior was highest in the high positive/low negative activated affect profile, followed by high positive/high negative activated affect (small difference). Creativity support and creativity demand moderated the relationship between affect profiles and creative behavior. We discuss implications for understanding creators and contexts in relation to creative behavior.</p></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><p>This study has implications for how we teach about affect and creativity. Results show that when creativity is required and when there is support for creativity, those who experience high positive activated/low negative activated affect and those who experience high positive activated/high negative activated affect show similarly high creativity. Teaching about emotions and creativity should stress that both positive and negative activated moods can be related to creative behavior.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102481"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creativity and affect: A person-centered analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zorana Ivcevic ,&nbsp;Shengjie Lin ,&nbsp;Xiaochen Liu ,&nbsp;Marc Brackett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examined the relationship between affect and creative behavior in a national sample of U.S. workers across industries (N = 12,743). Affect was assessed using open-ended questions and emotion rating scales. Those who spontaneously described only negative affect at work showed less creative behavior than those who used only positive terms (moderate effect size). Differences between those who described mixed and positive only affect were small. Examining ratings of affect frequency, we identified four profiles of positive and negative activated affect (high positive/low negative, low positive/high negative, high positive/high negative, low positive/low negative activated affect). Creative behavior was highest in the high positive/low negative activated affect profile, followed by high positive/high negative activated affect (small difference). Creativity support and creativity demand moderated the relationship between affect profiles and creative behavior. We discuss implications for understanding creators and contexts in relation to creative behavior.</p></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><p>This study has implications for how we teach about affect and creativity. Results show that when creativity is required and when there is support for creativity, those who experience high positive activated/low negative activated affect and those who experience high positive activated/high negative activated affect show similarly high creativity. Teaching about emotions and creativity should stress that both positive and negative activated moods can be related to creative behavior.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000748\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000748","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对美国各行业工人的全国样本(样本数 = 12,743 人)中情感与创造性行为之间的关系进行了研究。情绪评估采用开放式问题和情绪等级量表。自发描述工作中消极情绪的人比只使用积极词汇的人表现出更少的创造性行为(中等效应大小)。描述混合情绪和只描述积极情绪的人之间的差异很小。通过对情绪频率的评分,我们发现了四种积极和消极的激活情绪(高积极/低消极、低积极/高消极、高积极/高消极、低积极/低消极激活情绪)。高积极/低消极激活情绪的创造性行为最高,其次是高积极/高消极激活情绪(差异较小)。创造力支持和创造力需求调节了情感特征与创造行为之间的关系。我们讨论了了解创造者和创造行为相关背景的意义。教育相关性和影响声明这项研究对我们如何教授情感和创造力具有影响。研究结果表明,当需要创造力并且创造力得到支持时,那些经历过高积极激活/低消极激活情感的人和那些经历过高积极激活/高消极激活情感的人表现出类似的高创造力。有关情绪和创造力的教学应强调,积极和消极的激活情绪都可能与创造性行为有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creativity and affect: A person-centered analysis

This study examined the relationship between affect and creative behavior in a national sample of U.S. workers across industries (N = 12,743). Affect was assessed using open-ended questions and emotion rating scales. Those who spontaneously described only negative affect at work showed less creative behavior than those who used only positive terms (moderate effect size). Differences between those who described mixed and positive only affect were small. Examining ratings of affect frequency, we identified four profiles of positive and negative activated affect (high positive/low negative, low positive/high negative, high positive/high negative, low positive/low negative activated affect). Creative behavior was highest in the high positive/low negative activated affect profile, followed by high positive/high negative activated affect (small difference). Creativity support and creativity demand moderated the relationship between affect profiles and creative behavior. We discuss implications for understanding creators and contexts in relation to creative behavior.

Educational relevance and implications statement

This study has implications for how we teach about affect and creativity. Results show that when creativity is required and when there is support for creativity, those who experience high positive activated/low negative activated affect and those who experience high positive activated/high negative activated affect show similarly high creativity. Teaching about emotions and creativity should stress that both positive and negative activated moods can be related to creative behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
The structure of adult thinking: A network approach to (meta)cognitive processing Ink and pixels: Impact of highlighting and reading self-efficacy on adolescents' cognitive load, epistemic emotions, and text comprehension Students' study activities before and after exam deadlines as predictors of performance in STEM courses: A multi-source data analysis The relationship between positive and painful emotions and cognitive load during an algebra learning task Idiographic learning analytics: Mapping of the ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1