临床决策支持系统与分子肿瘤委员会就肿瘤排序指导下的胰腺癌治疗提出的建议保持一致

M. Kordes , L. Malgerud , J.-E. Frödin , J. Yachnin , C. Fernandez Moro , S. Ghazi , R. Pozzi Mucelli , N. Kartalis , P. Ghorbani , M. Del Chiaro , V. Wirta , M. Björnstedt , M.G. Liljefors , J.-M. Löhr
{"title":"临床决策支持系统与分子肿瘤委员会就肿瘤排序指导下的胰腺癌治疗提出的建议保持一致","authors":"M. Kordes ,&nbsp;L. Malgerud ,&nbsp;J.-E. Frödin ,&nbsp;J. Yachnin ,&nbsp;C. Fernandez Moro ,&nbsp;S. Ghazi ,&nbsp;R. Pozzi Mucelli ,&nbsp;N. Kartalis ,&nbsp;P. Ghorbani ,&nbsp;M. Del Chiaro ,&nbsp;V. Wirta ,&nbsp;M. Björnstedt ,&nbsp;M.G. Liljefors ,&nbsp;J.-M. Löhr","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDACs) can have actionable genomic alterations at varying frequencies. Harnessing tumour profiling for its treatment is an intricate procedure because the matching of aberrations with therapeutic opportunities is increasingly complex. We evaluated a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that can be used to rationalise this process.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with advanced PDAC were enrolled in a prospective observational study to assess a CDSS, MH Guide. Sequencing data were analysed with the CDSS, and a study-specific molecular tumour board (MTB) assessed reported actionabilities, ineffective drugs, and excess toxicity warnings. We carried out a <em>post hoc</em> analysis of each patient’s treatment within the purview of their medical team and compared it with CDSS and MTB statements.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 39 patients in the study, 31 had complete CDSS reports and 28 were discussed at the MTB. The CDSS made 80 treatment suggestions based on 61 actionable variants. It highlighted 14 inefficacy marker–drug pairs based on 7 individual markers and flagged a total of 15 individual markers of increased risks of drug-associated toxicity for 28 different cancer treatments. The study-specific MTB endorsed molecularly informed therapeutic options in 21 cases, but there was no exclusion of any drugs based on inefficacy or toxicity markers. The overall evidence underpinning assertions of actionability was weak. After the end of the study, eight patients received targeted treatment without signs of response or clinical benefit.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The oncology CDSS MH Guide can be deployed along the care path of patients with advanced PDAC but a critical review of assertions from it is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000311/pdfft?md5=fe903fb7fdba63622cfba3df51659a0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2949819824000311-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency of a clinical decision support system with molecular tumour board recommendations for tumour sequencing-guided treatment of pancreatic cancer\",\"authors\":\"M. Kordes ,&nbsp;L. Malgerud ,&nbsp;J.-E. Frödin ,&nbsp;J. Yachnin ,&nbsp;C. Fernandez Moro ,&nbsp;S. Ghazi ,&nbsp;R. Pozzi Mucelli ,&nbsp;N. Kartalis ,&nbsp;P. Ghorbani ,&nbsp;M. Del Chiaro ,&nbsp;V. Wirta ,&nbsp;M. Björnstedt ,&nbsp;M.G. Liljefors ,&nbsp;J.-M. Löhr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDACs) can have actionable genomic alterations at varying frequencies. Harnessing tumour profiling for its treatment is an intricate procedure because the matching of aberrations with therapeutic opportunities is increasingly complex. We evaluated a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that can be used to rationalise this process.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with advanced PDAC were enrolled in a prospective observational study to assess a CDSS, MH Guide. Sequencing data were analysed with the CDSS, and a study-specific molecular tumour board (MTB) assessed reported actionabilities, ineffective drugs, and excess toxicity warnings. We carried out a <em>post hoc</em> analysis of each patient’s treatment within the purview of their medical team and compared it with CDSS and MTB statements.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 39 patients in the study, 31 had complete CDSS reports and 28 were discussed at the MTB. The CDSS made 80 treatment suggestions based on 61 actionable variants. It highlighted 14 inefficacy marker–drug pairs based on 7 individual markers and flagged a total of 15 individual markers of increased risks of drug-associated toxicity for 28 different cancer treatments. The study-specific MTB endorsed molecularly informed therapeutic options in 21 cases, but there was no exclusion of any drugs based on inefficacy or toxicity markers. The overall evidence underpinning assertions of actionability was weak. After the end of the study, eight patients received targeted treatment without signs of response or clinical benefit.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The oncology CDSS MH Guide can be deployed along the care path of patients with advanced PDAC but a critical review of assertions from it is warranted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000311/pdfft?md5=fe903fb7fdba63622cfba3df51659a0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2949819824000311-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)可发生不同频率的可操作基因组改变。利用肿瘤图谱进行治疗是一个复杂的过程,因为畸变与治疗机会的匹配越来越复杂。我们评估了一种临床决策支持系统(CDSS),该系统可用于使这一过程合理化。方法晚期PDAC患者被纳入一项前瞻性观察研究,以评估一种CDSS--MH指南。利用 CDSS 分析测序数据,并由研究特定的分子肿瘤委员会 (MTB) 评估报告的有效性、无效药物和过量毒性警告。我们对每位患者在其医疗团队职权范围内的治疗进行了事后分析,并将其与 CDSS 和 MTB 的声明进行了比较。结果我们将 39 名患者纳入研究,其中 31 人有完整的 CDSS 报告,28 人在 MTB 上进行了讨论。CDSS 根据 61 个可操作变体提出了 80 项治疗建议。它根据 7 个单个标记物强调了 14 对无效标记物-药物,并针对 28 种不同的癌症治疗方法标记了共 15 个药物相关毒性风险增加的单个标记物。针对特定研究的 MTB 在 21 个病例中认可了分子信息治疗方案,但没有根据无效或毒性标记排除任何药物。支持可操作性论断的总体证据不足。结论《肿瘤 CDSS MH 指南》可用于晚期 PDAC 患者的治疗,但有必要对其中的论断进行严格审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consistency of a clinical decision support system with molecular tumour board recommendations for tumour sequencing-guided treatment of pancreatic cancer

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDACs) can have actionable genomic alterations at varying frequencies. Harnessing tumour profiling for its treatment is an intricate procedure because the matching of aberrations with therapeutic opportunities is increasingly complex. We evaluated a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that can be used to rationalise this process.

Methods

Patients with advanced PDAC were enrolled in a prospective observational study to assess a CDSS, MH Guide. Sequencing data were analysed with the CDSS, and a study-specific molecular tumour board (MTB) assessed reported actionabilities, ineffective drugs, and excess toxicity warnings. We carried out a post hoc analysis of each patient’s treatment within the purview of their medical team and compared it with CDSS and MTB statements.

Results

We included 39 patients in the study, 31 had complete CDSS reports and 28 were discussed at the MTB. The CDSS made 80 treatment suggestions based on 61 actionable variants. It highlighted 14 inefficacy marker–drug pairs based on 7 individual markers and flagged a total of 15 individual markers of increased risks of drug-associated toxicity for 28 different cancer treatments. The study-specific MTB endorsed molecularly informed therapeutic options in 21 cases, but there was no exclusion of any drugs based on inefficacy or toxicity markers. The overall evidence underpinning assertions of actionability was weak. After the end of the study, eight patients received targeted treatment without signs of response or clinical benefit.

Conclusion

The oncology CDSS MH Guide can be deployed along the care path of patients with advanced PDAC but a critical review of assertions from it is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gastric cancer hospital-based registry: real-world gastric cancer data from Latin America and Europe Geriatric Assessment-guided therapy modification and outcomes in patients with non-metastatic gastroesophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study☆ Table of Contents Editorial Board PRABITAS study design: a pragmatic, randomized phase III trial of bi-weekly versus conventional trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1