优化共享单车系统,提高经济效益:整合土地使用和零售

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Transport Geography Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103920
Madiha Bencekri , Yee Van Fan , Doyun Lee , Minje Choi , Seungjae Lee
{"title":"优化共享单车系统,提高经济效益:整合土地使用和零售","authors":"Madiha Bencekri ,&nbsp;Yee Van Fan ,&nbsp;Doyun Lee ,&nbsp;Minje Choi ,&nbsp;Seungjae Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the optimization of shared-bike station locations, emphasizing the cycling role in low-carbon mobility and local economic revitalization. A unique aspect of this research is the incorporation of the retail activity index in determining station locations, land-use mix, transit proximity, and population and employment densities. A novel weighting method, combining the multi-criteria decision method “Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC)” with Ensemble-based predictive algorithms (Random Forest, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting), was developed to evaluate these factors. Using a geographic information system-based spatial model, this study conducted a suitability analysis by applying these weights to assess and propose bike station sites. The findings from the Seoul case indicate a balanced land-use mix, a low number of transactions linked to cyclists, and a significant gap in multimodal transport integration. The weighting results revealed a high priority for transit proximity and retail activity in station placement. Suitability scores across districts revealed significant variability, suggesting the need for greater integration of cycling policies into urban planning. High-scoring districts, such as Gangnam-gu and Seocho-gu, offer insights for improvements in less suitable areas. This study advocates expanded cycling planning, focusing on enhancing access to public transit and retail areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing shared bike systems for economic gain: Integrating land use and retail\",\"authors\":\"Madiha Bencekri ,&nbsp;Yee Van Fan ,&nbsp;Doyun Lee ,&nbsp;Minje Choi ,&nbsp;Seungjae Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study explores the optimization of shared-bike station locations, emphasizing the cycling role in low-carbon mobility and local economic revitalization. A unique aspect of this research is the incorporation of the retail activity index in determining station locations, land-use mix, transit proximity, and population and employment densities. A novel weighting method, combining the multi-criteria decision method “Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC)” with Ensemble-based predictive algorithms (Random Forest, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting), was developed to evaluate these factors. Using a geographic information system-based spatial model, this study conducted a suitability analysis by applying these weights to assess and propose bike station sites. The findings from the Seoul case indicate a balanced land-use mix, a low number of transactions linked to cyclists, and a significant gap in multimodal transport integration. The weighting results revealed a high priority for transit proximity and retail activity in station placement. Suitability scores across districts revealed significant variability, suggesting the need for greater integration of cycling policies into urban planning. High-scoring districts, such as Gangnam-gu and Seocho-gu, offer insights for improvements in less suitable areas. This study advocates expanded cycling planning, focusing on enhancing access to public transit and retail areas.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692324001297\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692324001297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了共享单车站点位置的优化,强调了自行车在低碳交通和地方经济振兴中的作用。本研究的一个独特之处在于,在确定站点位置、土地使用组合、公交邻近度以及人口和就业密度时,纳入了零售活动指数。为评估这些因素,我们开发了一种新颖的加权方法,该方法结合了多标准决策方法 "标准重要性与标准间相关性(CRITIC)"和基于集合的预测算法(随机森林、XGBoost、梯度提升)。本研究使用基于地理信息系统的空间模型,通过应用这些权重来评估和建议自行车站点选址,从而进行适宜性分析。首尔案例的研究结果表明,首尔的土地使用结构比较均衡,与自行车相关的交易数量较少,在多式联运一体化方面存在很大差距。加权结果显示,在站点选址方面,交通便利性和零售活动具有很高的优先性。各区的适宜性得分差异很大,表明需要将自行车政策进一步纳入城市规划。江南区和瑞草区等得分较高的地区为改善不那么合适的地区提供了启示。本研究提倡扩大自行车规划,重点是加强与公共交通和零售区的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing shared bike systems for economic gain: Integrating land use and retail

This study explores the optimization of shared-bike station locations, emphasizing the cycling role in low-carbon mobility and local economic revitalization. A unique aspect of this research is the incorporation of the retail activity index in determining station locations, land-use mix, transit proximity, and population and employment densities. A novel weighting method, combining the multi-criteria decision method “Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC)” with Ensemble-based predictive algorithms (Random Forest, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting), was developed to evaluate these factors. Using a geographic information system-based spatial model, this study conducted a suitability analysis by applying these weights to assess and propose bike station sites. The findings from the Seoul case indicate a balanced land-use mix, a low number of transactions linked to cyclists, and a significant gap in multimodal transport integration. The weighting results revealed a high priority for transit proximity and retail activity in station placement. Suitability scores across districts revealed significant variability, suggesting the need for greater integration of cycling policies into urban planning. High-scoring districts, such as Gangnam-gu and Seocho-gu, offer insights for improvements in less suitable areas. This study advocates expanded cycling planning, focusing on enhancing access to public transit and retail areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
期刊最新文献
When e-activities meet spatial accessibility: A theoretical framework and empirical space-time thresholds for simulated spatial settings Bridging or separating? Co-accessibility as a measure of potential place-based encounters “We try our best to follow traffic rules because we don't want Hong Kong people to lose face”: Assimilation from transit to motorcycles among Hong Kong students in Taiwan Development of a complete method for re-conceptualizing street classification in an urban municipality The elephant in the room: Long-haul air services and climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1