早期主动脉瓣狭窄的心脏损伤:瓣膜是罪魁祸首吗?

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JACC. Cardiovascular imaging Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.05.003
{"title":"早期主动脉瓣狭窄的心脏损伤:瓣膜是罪魁祸首吗?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Despite the close association between aortic stenosis (AS) and cardiac damage (CD), it is unclear if CD is limited to patients with moderate and severe AS and which factors affect its progression. Although altered valvular </span>hemodynamic status may drive the development of CD in AS, commonly occurring comorbidities may contribute.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with CD in mild AS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This retrospective study included 9,611 patients with mild AS (peak aortic valve velocity [V</span><sub>max</sub>] 2-3 m/s and description of abnormal aortic valve) from 2010 through 2021. CD was staged using the Genereux classification.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span><span>All but 20% (n = 1,901; stage 0) of patients with mild AS demonstrated CD: 1,613 (17%) stage 1, 4,843 (50%) stage 2, 891 (9%) stage 3, and 363 (4%) stage 4. Patients with higher stages had more comorbidities (hypertension, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, stroke, </span>peripheral arterial disease<span>, chronic kidney disease, </span></span>chronic pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus) but had valvular hemodynamic status similar to those without CD. CD stage did not worsen with higher V</span><sub>max</sub> range (stage &gt;1 in 64% with V<sub>max</sub> &lt;2.5 m/s vs 61% with V<sub>max</sub> ≥2.5 m/s) but increased with the number of comorbidities, with stage &gt;1 occurring in 50%, 53%, 60%, 66%, 72%, and 73% in the presence of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or more comorbidities, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CD was highly prevalent in patients with mild AS. Among patients with mild AS, there was no relationship between the degree of CD and AS severity; instead, CD was highly associated with comorbidities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14767,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","volume":"17 9","pages":"Pages 1031-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac Damage in Early Aortic Stenosis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Despite the close association between aortic stenosis (AS) and cardiac damage (CD), it is unclear if CD is limited to patients with moderate and severe AS and which factors affect its progression. Although altered valvular </span>hemodynamic status may drive the development of CD in AS, commonly occurring comorbidities may contribute.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with CD in mild AS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This retrospective study included 9,611 patients with mild AS (peak aortic valve velocity [V</span><sub>max</sub>] 2-3 m/s and description of abnormal aortic valve) from 2010 through 2021. CD was staged using the Genereux classification.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span><span>All but 20% (n = 1,901; stage 0) of patients with mild AS demonstrated CD: 1,613 (17%) stage 1, 4,843 (50%) stage 2, 891 (9%) stage 3, and 363 (4%) stage 4. Patients with higher stages had more comorbidities (hypertension, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, stroke, </span>peripheral arterial disease<span>, chronic kidney disease, </span></span>chronic pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus) but had valvular hemodynamic status similar to those without CD. CD stage did not worsen with higher V</span><sub>max</sub> range (stage &gt;1 in 64% with V<sub>max</sub> &lt;2.5 m/s vs 61% with V<sub>max</sub> ≥2.5 m/s) but increased with the number of comorbidities, with stage &gt;1 occurring in 50%, 53%, 60%, 66%, 72%, and 73% in the presence of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or more comorbidities, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CD was highly prevalent in patients with mild AS. Among patients with mild AS, there was no relationship between the degree of CD and AS severity; instead, CD was highly associated with comorbidities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1031-1040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936878X24001906\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936878X24001906","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)与心脏损伤(CD)密切相关,但目前尚不清楚CD是否仅限于中度和重度AS患者,也不清楚哪些因素会影响CD的发展。虽然瓣膜血流动力学状态的改变可能是导致主动脉瓣狭窄患者发生心脏损害的原因,但常见的合并症也可能是导致心脏损害的原因之一:本研究旨在确定轻度强直性脊柱炎中 CD 的患病率及其相关因素:这项回顾性研究纳入了2010年至2021年的9611名轻度AS患者(主动脉瓣峰值速度[Vmax] 2-3 m/s,且描述主动脉瓣异常)。研究采用 Genereux 分类法对 CD 进行分期:除20%(1,901人;0期)的轻度AS患者外,其他患者均表现为CD:1,613人(17%)为1期,4,843人(50%)为2期,891人(9%)为3期,363人(4%)为4期。分期越高的患者合并症越多(高血压、心力衰竭、缺血性心脏病、中风、外周动脉疾病、慢性肾脏疾病、慢性肺部疾病和糖尿病),但其瓣膜血流动力学状态与无 CD 的患者相似。CD分期并不随着Vmax范围的增大而恶化(最大Vmax≥2.5 m/s的患者中64%分期>1),但随着合并症数量的增加而增加,在合并症为0、1、2、3、4和5个或更多的情况下,分别有50%、53%、60%、66%、72%和73%的患者分期>1:CD在轻度强直性脊柱炎患者中发病率很高。在轻度强直性脊柱炎患者中,CD的程度与强直性脊柱炎的严重程度没有关系;相反,CD与合并症高度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiac Damage in Early Aortic Stenosis

Background

Despite the close association between aortic stenosis (AS) and cardiac damage (CD), it is unclear if CD is limited to patients with moderate and severe AS and which factors affect its progression. Although altered valvular hemodynamic status may drive the development of CD in AS, commonly occurring comorbidities may contribute.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with CD in mild AS.

Methods

This retrospective study included 9,611 patients with mild AS (peak aortic valve velocity [Vmax] 2-3 m/s and description of abnormal aortic valve) from 2010 through 2021. CD was staged using the Genereux classification.

Results

All but 20% (n = 1,901; stage 0) of patients with mild AS demonstrated CD: 1,613 (17%) stage 1, 4,843 (50%) stage 2, 891 (9%) stage 3, and 363 (4%) stage 4. Patients with higher stages had more comorbidities (hypertension, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus) but had valvular hemodynamic status similar to those without CD. CD stage did not worsen with higher Vmax range (stage >1 in 64% with Vmax <2.5 m/s vs 61% with Vmax ≥2.5 m/s) but increased with the number of comorbidities, with stage >1 occurring in 50%, 53%, 60%, 66%, 72%, and 73% in the presence of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or more comorbidities, respectively.

Conclusions

CD was highly prevalent in patients with mild AS. Among patients with mild AS, there was no relationship between the degree of CD and AS severity; instead, CD was highly associated with comorbidities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, part of the prestigious Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) family, offers readers a comprehensive perspective on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging. This specialist journal covers original clinical research on both non-invasive and invasive imaging techniques, including echocardiography, CT, CMR, nuclear, optical imaging, and cine-angiography. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging highlights advances in basic science and molecular imaging that are expected to significantly impact clinical practice in the next decade. This influence encompasses improvements in diagnostic performance, enhanced understanding of the pathogenetic basis of diseases, and advancements in therapy. In addition to cutting-edge research,the content of JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging emphasizes practical aspects for the practicing cardiologist, including advocacy and practice management.The journal also features state-of-the-art reviews, ensuring a well-rounded and insightful resource for professionals in the field of cardiovascular imaging.
期刊最新文献
Mechanism and Impact of Left Atrial Dyssynchrony on Long-Term Clinical Outcome During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Editorial Board Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of LV Remodeling Post-Myocardial Infarction Longitudinal Evaluation of Coronary Arteries and Myocardium in Breast Cancer Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Myocardial Characteristics, Cardiac Structure, and Cardiac Function in Systemic Light-Chain Amyloidosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1