社区环境中预防痴呆症患者遭受虐待的干预措施的有效性:系统综述。

Dementia (London, England) Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1177/14713012241260476
Seelia Peter A, M Mukhyaprana Prabhu, Debbie Tolson, Baby S Nayak, Rajeshkrishna P Bhandary, Binil V, Elsa Sanatombi Devi
{"title":"社区环境中预防痴呆症患者遭受虐待的干预措施的有效性:系统综述。","authors":"Seelia Peter A, M Mukhyaprana Prabhu, Debbie Tolson, Baby S Nayak, Rajeshkrishna P Bhandary, Binil V, Elsa Sanatombi Devi","doi":"10.1177/14713012241260476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review examined the evidence for interventions to prevent the abuse of people living with dementia in the community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The articles were retrieved from 2000 to 2023 from six databases, including MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL Plus via EBSCO, EMBASE, ProQuest Medical Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. The research articles that focused on finding the effectiveness of interventions for preventing abuse of people living with dementia in community settings were included in this review. The review included randomized controlled trials and pre-test post-test trials only. The quality appraisal of the eligible studies was done using ROB 2 and ROBINS II. The findings were tabulated and narratively synthesised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1831 articles, only three were included in this review. Only two RCTs were included in this efficacy review. Both the studies showed that the interventions were not effective in reducing abuse. The studies utilised family caregiver interventions like psychological interventions and online supportive education. The review identified psychological interventions with some evidence. Another study was a quasi-experimental study that used dialectical behaviour therapy as an intervention to reduce abuse occurrence. The study showed low evidence and focused only on reporting of elder abuse as an outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review found very few studies and was not able to draw a conclusion on the effectiveness of interventions for abuse in people living with dementia. Given the paucity of research, there is a clear need to identify how to overcome the challenges faced in elder abuse research and further refine the development of approaches to reduce elder abuse among people living with dementia in community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1327-1353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of interventions to prevent abuse in people living with dementia in community settings: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Seelia Peter A, M Mukhyaprana Prabhu, Debbie Tolson, Baby S Nayak, Rajeshkrishna P Bhandary, Binil V, Elsa Sanatombi Devi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14713012241260476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review examined the evidence for interventions to prevent the abuse of people living with dementia in the community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The articles were retrieved from 2000 to 2023 from six databases, including MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL Plus via EBSCO, EMBASE, ProQuest Medical Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. The research articles that focused on finding the effectiveness of interventions for preventing abuse of people living with dementia in community settings were included in this review. The review included randomized controlled trials and pre-test post-test trials only. The quality appraisal of the eligible studies was done using ROB 2 and ROBINS II. The findings were tabulated and narratively synthesised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1831 articles, only three were included in this review. Only two RCTs were included in this efficacy review. Both the studies showed that the interventions were not effective in reducing abuse. The studies utilised family caregiver interventions like psychological interventions and online supportive education. The review identified psychological interventions with some evidence. Another study was a quasi-experimental study that used dialectical behaviour therapy as an intervention to reduce abuse occurrence. The study showed low evidence and focused only on reporting of elder abuse as an outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review found very few studies and was not able to draw a conclusion on the effectiveness of interventions for abuse in people living with dementia. Given the paucity of research, there is a clear need to identify how to overcome the challenges faced in elder abuse research and further refine the development of approaches to reduce elder abuse among people living with dementia in community settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1327-1353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491043/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012241260476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012241260476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的本综述研究了预防社区痴呆症患者遭受虐待的干预措施的证据:从 PubMed 的 MEDLINE、EBSCO 的 CINAHL Plus、EMBASE、ProQuest Medical Library、Web of Science 和 Scopus 等六个数据库中检索了 2000 年至 2023 年期间的文章。本综述收录的研究文章侧重于发现预防社区环境中痴呆症患者遭受虐待的干预措施的有效性。综述仅包括随机对照试验和测试前测试后试验。采用 ROB 2 和 ROBINS II 对符合条件的研究进行了质量评估。对研究结果进行了列表和叙述性综合:在 1831 篇文章中,只有三篇被纳入本次综述。只有两项随机对照研究被纳入本次疗效综述。这两项研究都表明,干预措施并不能有效减少虐待行为。这些研究采用了家庭照顾者干预措施,如心理干预和在线支持性教育。该综述确定了一些证据确凿的心理干预措施。另一项研究是一项准实验研究,采用辩证行为疗法作为干预措施,以减少虐待事件的发生。该研究显示的证据较少,且仅将报告虐老事件作为一项结果:本综述发现的研究很少,因此无法就干预痴呆症患者虐待行为的有效性得出结论。鉴于相关研究较少,显然有必要确定如何克服虐老研究中面临的挑战,并进一步完善相关方法的开发,以减少社区环境中痴呆症患者的虐老行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of interventions to prevent abuse in people living with dementia in community settings: A systematic review.

Objectives: This review examined the evidence for interventions to prevent the abuse of people living with dementia in the community.

Methods: The articles were retrieved from 2000 to 2023 from six databases, including MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL Plus via EBSCO, EMBASE, ProQuest Medical Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. The research articles that focused on finding the effectiveness of interventions for preventing abuse of people living with dementia in community settings were included in this review. The review included randomized controlled trials and pre-test post-test trials only. The quality appraisal of the eligible studies was done using ROB 2 and ROBINS II. The findings were tabulated and narratively synthesised.

Results: Out of 1831 articles, only three were included in this review. Only two RCTs were included in this efficacy review. Both the studies showed that the interventions were not effective in reducing abuse. The studies utilised family caregiver interventions like psychological interventions and online supportive education. The review identified psychological interventions with some evidence. Another study was a quasi-experimental study that used dialectical behaviour therapy as an intervention to reduce abuse occurrence. The study showed low evidence and focused only on reporting of elder abuse as an outcome.

Conclusion: This review found very few studies and was not able to draw a conclusion on the effectiveness of interventions for abuse in people living with dementia. Given the paucity of research, there is a clear need to identify how to overcome the challenges faced in elder abuse research and further refine the development of approaches to reduce elder abuse among people living with dementia in community settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the effectiveness and experiences of people living with dementia interacting with digital interventions: A mixed methods systematic review. A scoping review of dementia education programs to assess for the inclusion of culture. Evolving dementia care: An explorative study on the lived experience of older adults living with dementia in nursing homes using observational and biometric sensor data. Community health workers supporting diverse family caregivers of persons with dementia: Preliminary qualitative results from a randomized home-based study. Participation of persons living with dementia in research: A means to address epistemic injustice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1