静脉注射磷霉素作为革兰氏阴性菌血流感染的辅助疗法:倾向分数调整后的回顾性队列研究。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107247
{"title":"静脉注射磷霉素作为革兰氏阴性菌血流感染的辅助疗法:倾向分数调整后的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The role of intravenous fosfomycin (iv-FOS) as a part of combination therapy for Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI) needs to be evaluated in clinical practice, as in vitro data show potential efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All consecutive patients with a GNB-BSI from 01 January 2021 to 01 April 2023 were included. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality; an inverse-probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was also performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 363 patients were enrolled: 211 (58%) males, with a median (q1–q3) age of 68 (57–78) years, and a median Charlson comorbidity index of 5 (3–7). At GNB-BSI onset, the median SOFA score was 5 (2–7) and 122 patients (34%) presented with septic shock. Pathogens were principally <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> (42%), <em>Escherichia coli</em> (28%) and <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (17%); of them, 36% were carbapenem-resistant. The therapy included carbapenems (40%), cephalosporins (37%) and beta-lactams/beta-lactamases-inhibitors (19%); a combination with iv-FOS was used in 98 (27%) cases at a median dosage of 16 (16–18) g/daily. The use of iv-FOS was not associated with reduced crude mortality (21% vs 29%, <em>P</em> = 0.147). However, on multivariable Cox-regression, combination therapy with iv-FOS resulted in protection for mortality (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28–0.92), but not other combo-therapies (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44–1.16). This result was also confirmed with the IPTW-adjusted Cox model (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31–0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested a benefit in severe infections (SOFA &gt; 6, PITT ≥ 4) and when iv-FOS was initiated within 24 hours of GNB-BSI onset.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Fosfomycin in combination therapy for GNB-BSI may have a role in improving survival. These results justify the development of further clinical trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous Fosfomycin as Adjunctive Therapy for Gram-Negative Bacteria Bloodstream Infections: A Propensity Score Adjusted Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The role of intravenous fosfomycin (iv-FOS) as a part of combination therapy for Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI) needs to be evaluated in clinical practice, as in vitro data show potential efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All consecutive patients with a GNB-BSI from 01 January 2021 to 01 April 2023 were included. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality; an inverse-probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was also performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 363 patients were enrolled: 211 (58%) males, with a median (q1–q3) age of 68 (57–78) years, and a median Charlson comorbidity index of 5 (3–7). At GNB-BSI onset, the median SOFA score was 5 (2–7) and 122 patients (34%) presented with septic shock. Pathogens were principally <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> (42%), <em>Escherichia coli</em> (28%) and <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (17%); of them, 36% were carbapenem-resistant. The therapy included carbapenems (40%), cephalosporins (37%) and beta-lactams/beta-lactamases-inhibitors (19%); a combination with iv-FOS was used in 98 (27%) cases at a median dosage of 16 (16–18) g/daily. The use of iv-FOS was not associated with reduced crude mortality (21% vs 29%, <em>P</em> = 0.147). However, on multivariable Cox-regression, combination therapy with iv-FOS resulted in protection for mortality (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28–0.92), but not other combo-therapies (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44–1.16). This result was also confirmed with the IPTW-adjusted Cox model (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31–0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested a benefit in severe infections (SOFA &gt; 6, PITT ≥ 4) and when iv-FOS was initiated within 24 hours of GNB-BSI onset.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Fosfomycin in combination therapy for GNB-BSI may have a role in improving survival. These results justify the development of further clinical trials.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001651\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:静脉注射磷霉素(iv-FOS)作为革兰氏阴性菌血流感染(GNB-BSI)联合疗法的一部分,需要在临床实践中进行评估,因为体外数据显示其具有潜在疗效:方法:纳入 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 4 月 1 日期间所有 GNB-BSI 连续患者。主要结果为 30 天死亡率。采用 Cox 回归分析确定死亡率的预测因素。此外,还进行了治疗加权反概率(IPTW)分析:共有 363 名患者入选:其中 211 名(58%)男性,中位(q1-q3)年龄为 68(57-78)岁,中位夏尔森综合症指数为 5(3-7)。GNB-BSI 发病时,SOFA 评分中位数为 5(2-7)分,122 人(34%)出现脓毒性休克。病原体主要是肺炎双球菌(42%)、大肠杆菌(28%)和铜绿假单胞菌(17%),其中 36% 对碳青霉烯类耐药。治疗包括碳青霉烯类(40%)、头孢菌素类(37%)和β-内酰胺类/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(19%);98 例(27%)病例联合使用了 iv-FOS,中位剂量为 16(16-18)克/天。使用 iv-FOS 与粗死亡率降低无关(21% vs 29%,P 值=0.147)。但是,在多变量 Cox 回归中,使用 iv-FOS 联合疗法可降低死亡率(aHR=0.51,95%CI=0.28-0.92),而使用其他联合疗法则不会降低死亡率(HR=0.69,95%CI=0.44-1.16)。IPTW调整后的Cox模型也证实了这一结果(aHR=0.52,95%CI=0.31-0.91)。亚组分析表明,在严重感染(SOFA>6,PITT≥4)以及在GNB-BSI发生后24小时内开始使用iv-FOS时,患者可从中获益:结论:磷霉素联合治疗 GNB-BSI 可提高存活率。结论:复方霉素联合治疗 GNB-BSI 可提高存活率,因此有必要开展进一步的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravenous Fosfomycin as Adjunctive Therapy for Gram-Negative Bacteria Bloodstream Infections: A Propensity Score Adjusted Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

The role of intravenous fosfomycin (iv-FOS) as a part of combination therapy for Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI) needs to be evaluated in clinical practice, as in vitro data show potential efficacy.

Methods

All consecutive patients with a GNB-BSI from 01 January 2021 to 01 April 2023 were included. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality; an inverse-probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was also performed.

Results

Overall, 363 patients were enrolled: 211 (58%) males, with a median (q1–q3) age of 68 (57–78) years, and a median Charlson comorbidity index of 5 (3–7). At GNB-BSI onset, the median SOFA score was 5 (2–7) and 122 patients (34%) presented with septic shock. Pathogens were principally Klebsiella pneumoniae (42%), Escherichia coli (28%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%); of them, 36% were carbapenem-resistant. The therapy included carbapenems (40%), cephalosporins (37%) and beta-lactams/beta-lactamases-inhibitors (19%); a combination with iv-FOS was used in 98 (27%) cases at a median dosage of 16 (16–18) g/daily. The use of iv-FOS was not associated with reduced crude mortality (21% vs 29%, P = 0.147). However, on multivariable Cox-regression, combination therapy with iv-FOS resulted in protection for mortality (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28–0.92), but not other combo-therapies (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44–1.16). This result was also confirmed with the IPTW-adjusted Cox model (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31–0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested a benefit in severe infections (SOFA > 6, PITT ≥ 4) and when iv-FOS was initiated within 24 hours of GNB-BSI onset.

Conclusions

Fosfomycin in combination therapy for GNB-BSI may have a role in improving survival. These results justify the development of further clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.
期刊最新文献
Access to phage therapy at Hospices Civils de Lyon in 2022: Implementation of the PHAGEinLYON Clinic program. Title Page & Editorial Board Hypervirulent Carbapenem-Susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae ST412/K57 with Strong Biofilm Formation: association with gas gangrene and sepsis. Isoniazid Prophylaxis Based on Tuberculosis Risk Factors in Living Kidney Transplantation Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Machine Learning Accelerates the Discovery of Epitope-based Dual-bioactive Peptides Against Skin Infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1