{"title":"静脉注射磷霉素作为革兰氏阴性菌血流感染的辅助疗法:倾向分数调整后的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The role of intravenous fosfomycin (iv-FOS) as a part of combination therapy for Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI) needs to be evaluated in clinical practice, as in vitro data show potential efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All consecutive patients with a GNB-BSI from 01 January 2021 to 01 April 2023 were included. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality; an inverse-probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was also performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 363 patients were enrolled: 211 (58%) males, with a median (q1–q3) age of 68 (57–78) years, and a median Charlson comorbidity index of 5 (3–7). At GNB-BSI onset, the median SOFA score was 5 (2–7) and 122 patients (34%) presented with septic shock. Pathogens were principally <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> (42%), <em>Escherichia coli</em> (28%) and <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (17%); of them, 36% were carbapenem-resistant. The therapy included carbapenems (40%), cephalosporins (37%) and beta-lactams/beta-lactamases-inhibitors (19%); a combination with iv-FOS was used in 98 (27%) cases at a median dosage of 16 (16–18) g/daily. The use of iv-FOS was not associated with reduced crude mortality (21% vs 29%, <em>P</em> = 0.147). However, on multivariable Cox-regression, combination therapy with iv-FOS resulted in protection for mortality (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28–0.92), but not other combo-therapies (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44–1.16). This result was also confirmed with the IPTW-adjusted Cox model (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31–0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested a benefit in severe infections (SOFA > 6, PITT ≥ 4) and when iv-FOS was initiated within 24 hours of GNB-BSI onset.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Fosfomycin in combination therapy for GNB-BSI may have a role in improving survival. These results justify the development of further clinical trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous Fosfomycin as Adjunctive Therapy for Gram-Negative Bacteria Bloodstream Infections: A Propensity Score Adjusted Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The role of intravenous fosfomycin (iv-FOS) as a part of combination therapy for Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI) needs to be evaluated in clinical practice, as in vitro data show potential efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All consecutive patients with a GNB-BSI from 01 January 2021 to 01 April 2023 were included. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality; an inverse-probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was also performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 363 patients were enrolled: 211 (58%) males, with a median (q1–q3) age of 68 (57–78) years, and a median Charlson comorbidity index of 5 (3–7). At GNB-BSI onset, the median SOFA score was 5 (2–7) and 122 patients (34%) presented with septic shock. Pathogens were principally <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> (42%), <em>Escherichia coli</em> (28%) and <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (17%); of them, 36% were carbapenem-resistant. The therapy included carbapenems (40%), cephalosporins (37%) and beta-lactams/beta-lactamases-inhibitors (19%); a combination with iv-FOS was used in 98 (27%) cases at a median dosage of 16 (16–18) g/daily. The use of iv-FOS was not associated with reduced crude mortality (21% vs 29%, <em>P</em> = 0.147). However, on multivariable Cox-regression, combination therapy with iv-FOS resulted in protection for mortality (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28–0.92), but not other combo-therapies (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44–1.16). This result was also confirmed with the IPTW-adjusted Cox model (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31–0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested a benefit in severe infections (SOFA > 6, PITT ≥ 4) and when iv-FOS was initiated within 24 hours of GNB-BSI onset.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Fosfomycin in combination therapy for GNB-BSI may have a role in improving survival. These results justify the development of further clinical trials.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001651\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intravenous Fosfomycin as Adjunctive Therapy for Gram-Negative Bacteria Bloodstream Infections: A Propensity Score Adjusted Retrospective Cohort Study
Background
The role of intravenous fosfomycin (iv-FOS) as a part of combination therapy for Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI) needs to be evaluated in clinical practice, as in vitro data show potential efficacy.
Methods
All consecutive patients with a GNB-BSI from 01 January 2021 to 01 April 2023 were included. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality; an inverse-probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was also performed.
Results
Overall, 363 patients were enrolled: 211 (58%) males, with a median (q1–q3) age of 68 (57–78) years, and a median Charlson comorbidity index of 5 (3–7). At GNB-BSI onset, the median SOFA score was 5 (2–7) and 122 patients (34%) presented with septic shock. Pathogens were principally Klebsiella pneumoniae (42%), Escherichia coli (28%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%); of them, 36% were carbapenem-resistant. The therapy included carbapenems (40%), cephalosporins (37%) and beta-lactams/beta-lactamases-inhibitors (19%); a combination with iv-FOS was used in 98 (27%) cases at a median dosage of 16 (16–18) g/daily. The use of iv-FOS was not associated with reduced crude mortality (21% vs 29%, P = 0.147). However, on multivariable Cox-regression, combination therapy with iv-FOS resulted in protection for mortality (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28–0.92), but not other combo-therapies (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44–1.16). This result was also confirmed with the IPTW-adjusted Cox model (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31–0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested a benefit in severe infections (SOFA > 6, PITT ≥ 4) and when iv-FOS was initiated within 24 hours of GNB-BSI onset.
Conclusions
Fosfomycin in combination therapy for GNB-BSI may have a role in improving survival. These results justify the development of further clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.