IF 0.3 4区 医学Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTHSante PubliquePub Date : 2024-01-01
Marie Massuard, Julie Lane, Luiza Maria Manceau, Pascale Castonguay, Renée Proulx
{"title":"分析魁北克自闭症知识转让基础设施:RNETSA。","authors":"Marie Massuard, Julie Lane, Luiza Maria Manceau, Pascale Castonguay, Renée Proulx","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many Knowledge Translation (KT) networks have been set up to support the improvement of research-based practices. However despite the deployment of KT networks, there is little empirical data on how they work. The Réseau national d’expertise en trouble du spectre de l’autisme (RNETSA) is the result of a ministerial initiative.</p><p><strong>Objective and method: </strong>Its mission is to promote the evolution of autism practices and services in the education, early childhood, and health and social services sectors. The purpose of this article is to analyze the governance structure and KT strategy of the RNETSA in terms of its legitimacy. The study was based on a case study design combining a literature review and interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results highlight the key components of 1) the governance structure (e.g., identification of a common need, formalization of bodies, allocation of resources) and 2) the KT strategy (e.g., knowledge dissemination, collaborations, increasing participation in activities). The discussion addresses a number of building blocks that could help strengthen the network’s legitimacy with a view to bringing it closer to its purpose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RNETSA has demonstrated a strong capacity to ensure its legitimacy in the autism KT ecosystem. The potential to influence public policy in the field of autism is also a key feature of RNETSA. To improve knowledge of RNETSA’s legitimacy, an evaluation of the effects of its KT activities would be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyse d’une infrastructure québécoise de transfert de connaissances en autisme : le RNETSA.\",\"authors\":\"Marie Massuard, Julie Lane, Luiza Maria Manceau, Pascale Castonguay, Renée Proulx\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many Knowledge Translation (KT) networks have been set up to support the improvement of research-based practices. However despite the deployment of KT networks, there is little empirical data on how they work. The Réseau national d’expertise en trouble du spectre de l’autisme (RNETSA) is the result of a ministerial initiative.</p><p><strong>Objective and method: </strong>Its mission is to promote the evolution of autism practices and services in the education, early childhood, and health and social services sectors. The purpose of this article is to analyze the governance structure and KT strategy of the RNETSA in terms of its legitimacy. The study was based on a case study design combining a literature review and interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results highlight the key components of 1) the governance structure (e.g., identification of a common need, formalization of bodies, allocation of resources) and 2) the KT strategy (e.g., knowledge dissemination, collaborations, increasing participation in activities). The discussion addresses a number of building blocks that could help strengthen the network’s legitimacy with a view to bringing it closer to its purpose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RNETSA has demonstrated a strong capacity to ensure its legitimacy in the autism KT ecosystem. The potential to influence public policy in the field of autism is also a key feature of RNETSA. To improve knowledge of RNETSA’s legitimacy, an evaluation of the effects of its KT activities would be necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sante Publique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sante Publique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:许多知识转化(Knowledge Translation,KT)网络已经建立起来,以支持改进以研究为基础的实践。然而,尽管建立了知识转化(KT)网络,但关于这些网络如何发挥作用的经验数据却很少。Réseau national d’expertise en trouble du spectre de l’autisme (RNETSA)是一项部级倡议的成果:其使命是促进自闭症在教育、幼儿、卫生和社会服务领域的实践和服务的发展。本文旨在从合法性角度分析 RNETSA 的治理结构和 KT 战略。研究采用案例研究设计,结合文献综述和访谈:结果:研究结果强调了 1) 治理结构(如确定共同需求、机构正规化、资源分配)和 2) 知识 技术战略(如知识传播、合作、提高活动参与度)的关键组成部分。讨论涉及了一些有助于加强网络合法性的组成部分,以期使其更接近目标:RNETSA 在确保其在自闭症知识与技术生态系统中的合法性方面表现出了强大的能力。影响自闭症领域公共政策的潜力也是 RNETSA 的一个主要特点。为了提高对 RNETSA’legitimacy 的认识,有必要对其 KT 活动的效果进行评估。
Analyse d’une infrastructure québécoise de transfert de connaissances en autisme : le RNETSA.
Introduction: Many Knowledge Translation (KT) networks have been set up to support the improvement of research-based practices. However despite the deployment of KT networks, there is little empirical data on how they work. The Réseau national d’expertise en trouble du spectre de l’autisme (RNETSA) is the result of a ministerial initiative.
Objective and method: Its mission is to promote the evolution of autism practices and services in the education, early childhood, and health and social services sectors. The purpose of this article is to analyze the governance structure and KT strategy of the RNETSA in terms of its legitimacy. The study was based on a case study design combining a literature review and interviews.
Results: The results highlight the key components of 1) the governance structure (e.g., identification of a common need, formalization of bodies, allocation of resources) and 2) the KT strategy (e.g., knowledge dissemination, collaborations, increasing participation in activities). The discussion addresses a number of building blocks that could help strengthen the network’s legitimacy with a view to bringing it closer to its purpose.
Conclusions: RNETSA has demonstrated a strong capacity to ensure its legitimacy in the autism KT ecosystem. The potential to influence public policy in the field of autism is also a key feature of RNETSA. To improve knowledge of RNETSA’s legitimacy, an evaluation of the effects of its KT activities would be necessary.
期刊介绍:
La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs,
professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie
des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions
de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de
soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale.
Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur
l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants
et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé,
organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques
de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation
et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille
sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents
secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique
d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources,
politiques de régulation et de financement, etc