与新型泌尿生殖系统癌症疗法相关的皮肤毒性谱。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Critical reviews in oncology/hematology Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104420
Rachel Daher , Andrew Ruplin , Shilpa Gupta , Philippe E. Spiess , Ashish M. Kamat , Antonio Cigliola , Valentina Tateo , Chiara Mercinelli , Petros Grivas , Andrea Necchi
{"title":"与新型泌尿生殖系统癌症疗法相关的皮肤毒性谱。","authors":"Rachel Daher ,&nbsp;Andrew Ruplin ,&nbsp;Shilpa Gupta ,&nbsp;Philippe E. Spiess ,&nbsp;Ashish M. Kamat ,&nbsp;Antonio Cigliola ,&nbsp;Valentina Tateo ,&nbsp;Chiara Mercinelli ,&nbsp;Petros Grivas ,&nbsp;Andrea Necchi","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Genitourinary cancers (GUCs) encompass malignancies affecting the urinary and reproductive systems, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), and prostate cancer (PC). With the rapidly evolving therapeutic domain of these cancers, cutaneous adverse events (AEs) remain among the most observed toxicities.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the dermatologic AEs linked to novel GUC treatments, their underlying pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Evidence acquisition</h3><p>A narrative review of the literature from PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. The search strategy included <em>dermatologic/cutaneous adverse events, risk factors,</em> and <em>pathophysiology</em> in conjunction with the following classes of therapies; <em>immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antiangiogenic therapies, enfortumab vedotin (EV), erdafitinib,</em> and <em>androgen receptor</em> antagonists <em>(ARAs).</em></p></div><div><h3>Evidence synthesis</h3><p>Maculopapular rash, pruritus, and alopecia are present among the five classes of therapies. ICIs demonstrate the highest incidence of severe drug AEs including Steven Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Unique cutaneous AEs present with specific therapies including hand-foot skin reaction and subungual splinter hemorrhage with antiangiogenic drugs, stomatitis/mucositis and onycholysis with erdafitinib. Incidence and type of cutaneous AE also differed within therapies in the same class as seen with apalutamide displaying the highest risk of cutaneous AEs within ARAs. Risk factors for development of cutaneous AEs can be general to therapies, or specific, and include age, immune status, BMI, and gender.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Dermatologic AEs may impact patients’ quality of life and increase the tendency to dose reduce, hold or discontinue life-saving therapies, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring, early recognition, and collaborative management between medical oncologists, pharmacists, dermatologists and other specialists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The spectrum of cutaneous toxicities related to novel genitourinary cancer therapies\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Daher ,&nbsp;Andrew Ruplin ,&nbsp;Shilpa Gupta ,&nbsp;Philippe E. Spiess ,&nbsp;Ashish M. Kamat ,&nbsp;Antonio Cigliola ,&nbsp;Valentina Tateo ,&nbsp;Chiara Mercinelli ,&nbsp;Petros Grivas ,&nbsp;Andrea Necchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Genitourinary cancers (GUCs) encompass malignancies affecting the urinary and reproductive systems, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), and prostate cancer (PC). With the rapidly evolving therapeutic domain of these cancers, cutaneous adverse events (AEs) remain among the most observed toxicities.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the dermatologic AEs linked to novel GUC treatments, their underlying pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Evidence acquisition</h3><p>A narrative review of the literature from PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. The search strategy included <em>dermatologic/cutaneous adverse events, risk factors,</em> and <em>pathophysiology</em> in conjunction with the following classes of therapies; <em>immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antiangiogenic therapies, enfortumab vedotin (EV), erdafitinib,</em> and <em>androgen receptor</em> antagonists <em>(ARAs).</em></p></div><div><h3>Evidence synthesis</h3><p>Maculopapular rash, pruritus, and alopecia are present among the five classes of therapies. ICIs demonstrate the highest incidence of severe drug AEs including Steven Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Unique cutaneous AEs present with specific therapies including hand-foot skin reaction and subungual splinter hemorrhage with antiangiogenic drugs, stomatitis/mucositis and onycholysis with erdafitinib. Incidence and type of cutaneous AE also differed within therapies in the same class as seen with apalutamide displaying the highest risk of cutaneous AEs within ARAs. Risk factors for development of cutaneous AEs can be general to therapies, or specific, and include age, immune status, BMI, and gender.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Dermatologic AEs may impact patients’ quality of life and increase the tendency to dose reduce, hold or discontinue life-saving therapies, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring, early recognition, and collaborative management between medical oncologists, pharmacists, dermatologists and other specialists.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104084282400163X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104084282400163X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:泌尿生殖系统癌症(GUC)包括影响泌尿和生殖系统的恶性肿瘤,包括肾细胞癌(RCC)、尿路上皮癌(UC)和前列腺癌(PC)。随着这些癌症治疗领域的快速发展,皮肤不良事件(AEs)仍然是观察到的最多的毒性反应之一:探索与新型 GUC 治疗相关的皮肤不良反应、其潜在的病理生理学、临床表现和风险因素:对PubMed和Embase数据库中的文献进行了叙述性综述。检索策略包括皮肤病/皮肤不良事件、风险因素和病理生理学,并结合以下几类疗法:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)、抗血管生成疗法、恩福妥单抗维多汀(EV)、厄达非替尼和雄激素受体拮抗剂(ARAs):五类疗法均存在斑丘疹、瘙痒和脱发。ICIs 的严重药物不良反应发生率最高,包括史蒂文-约翰逊综合征/毒性表皮坏死溶解症。特定疗法会出现独特的皮肤不良反应,包括抗血管生成药物引起的手足皮肤反应和舌下出血,厄达非替尼引起的口腔炎/粘膜炎和荨麻疹。皮肤AE的发生率和类型在同类疗法中也存在差异,如阿帕鲁胺在ARA中发生皮肤AE的风险最高。发生皮肤AE的风险因素可能与疗法有关,也可能与特定疗法有关,包括年龄、免疫状态、体重指数和性别:皮肤AEs可能会影响患者的生活质量,并使患者更倾向于保留或中断挽救生命的疗法,这突出表明肿瘤内科医生、药剂师和皮肤科医生之间需要警惕监测、早期识别和协同管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The spectrum of cutaneous toxicities related to novel genitourinary cancer therapies

Context

Genitourinary cancers (GUCs) encompass malignancies affecting the urinary and reproductive systems, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), and prostate cancer (PC). With the rapidly evolving therapeutic domain of these cancers, cutaneous adverse events (AEs) remain among the most observed toxicities.

Objective

To explore the dermatologic AEs linked to novel GUC treatments, their underlying pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and risk factors.

Evidence acquisition

A narrative review of the literature from PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. The search strategy included dermatologic/cutaneous adverse events, risk factors, and pathophysiology in conjunction with the following classes of therapies; immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antiangiogenic therapies, enfortumab vedotin (EV), erdafitinib, and androgen receptor antagonists (ARAs).

Evidence synthesis

Maculopapular rash, pruritus, and alopecia are present among the five classes of therapies. ICIs demonstrate the highest incidence of severe drug AEs including Steven Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Unique cutaneous AEs present with specific therapies including hand-foot skin reaction and subungual splinter hemorrhage with antiangiogenic drugs, stomatitis/mucositis and onycholysis with erdafitinib. Incidence and type of cutaneous AE also differed within therapies in the same class as seen with apalutamide displaying the highest risk of cutaneous AEs within ARAs. Risk factors for development of cutaneous AEs can be general to therapies, or specific, and include age, immune status, BMI, and gender.

Conclusions

Dermatologic AEs may impact patients’ quality of life and increase the tendency to dose reduce, hold or discontinue life-saving therapies, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring, early recognition, and collaborative management between medical oncologists, pharmacists, dermatologists and other specialists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
213
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Targeted Therapy with Polymeric Nanoparticles in PBRM1-Mutant Biliary Tract Cancers: Harnessing DNA Damage Repair Mechanisms. The Potential of Circulating Cell-Free RNA in CNS Tumor Diagnosis and Monitoring: A Liquid Biopsy Approach. PROTON THERAPY FOR ADULT-TYPE DIFFUSE GLIOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1