袖套式 "缝合法改善根治性气管切除术后子宫供血的可行性:回顾性分析

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2024.101432
Chunxian Huang , Shaodan Lin , Miaochun Xu , Aoshuang Cheng , Yunyun Liu , Zhongqiu Lin , Ming Gao , Huaiwu Lu
{"title":"袖套式 \"缝合法改善根治性气管切除术后子宫供血的可行性:回顾性分析","authors":"Chunxian Huang ,&nbsp;Shaodan Lin ,&nbsp;Miaochun Xu ,&nbsp;Aoshuang Cheng ,&nbsp;Yunyun Liu ,&nbsp;Zhongqiu Lin ,&nbsp;Ming Gao ,&nbsp;Huaiwu Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the feasibility of the “cuff-sleeve” suture method in improving the uterine blood supply after radical trachelectomy (RT).</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Patients in the “cuff-sleeve” (n = 25) and traditional group (n = 10) underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) to evaluate the residual uterine blood supply pattern after the surgery, and the preoperative group patients (n = 20) underwent CTA before the procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The uteri of the 20 patients in the preoperative group were all supplied by bilateral uterine arteries of average diameter, 2.25 ± 0.35 mm. The uterine artery-supplying, hybrid supplying, and ovarian artery-supplying patterns accounted for 40 %, 36 %, and 24 % in the “cuff-sleeve” group and 20 %, 50 %, and 30 %, respectively, in the traditional group. The average diameter of the uterine arteries among the uterine artery-supplying pattern in the “cuff-sleeve” group (1.98 ± 0.36 mm) was more extensive than that in the traditional group (1.73 ± 0.15 mm) (<em>p</em> = 0.049). As also, the ovarian artery diameter of the hybrid supplying pattern in the “cuff-sleeve” group (1.65 ± 0.25 mm) was significantly larger than that in the traditional group (1.50 ± 0.35 mm) (<em>p</em> = 0.010). Additionally, while the pregnancy rate in the “cuff-sleeve” group (50.0 %) was higher than that in the traditional group (25.0 %), this difference was not statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The “cuff-sleeve” suture method was associated with increased diameter of the uterine and ovarian vessels and may be a feasible method to improve the uterine blood supply and pregnancy rate after radical trachelectomy. It still warrants further evaluation for both fertility and oncologic outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001115/pdfft?md5=8735081a59f3b2df4969c70b8b575ae7&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001115-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of the “cuff-sleeve” suture method in improving the uterine blood supply after radical trachelectomy: A retrospective analysis\",\"authors\":\"Chunxian Huang ,&nbsp;Shaodan Lin ,&nbsp;Miaochun Xu ,&nbsp;Aoshuang Cheng ,&nbsp;Yunyun Liu ,&nbsp;Zhongqiu Lin ,&nbsp;Ming Gao ,&nbsp;Huaiwu Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the feasibility of the “cuff-sleeve” suture method in improving the uterine blood supply after radical trachelectomy (RT).</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Patients in the “cuff-sleeve” (n = 25) and traditional group (n = 10) underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) to evaluate the residual uterine blood supply pattern after the surgery, and the preoperative group patients (n = 20) underwent CTA before the procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The uteri of the 20 patients in the preoperative group were all supplied by bilateral uterine arteries of average diameter, 2.25 ± 0.35 mm. The uterine artery-supplying, hybrid supplying, and ovarian artery-supplying patterns accounted for 40 %, 36 %, and 24 % in the “cuff-sleeve” group and 20 %, 50 %, and 30 %, respectively, in the traditional group. The average diameter of the uterine arteries among the uterine artery-supplying pattern in the “cuff-sleeve” group (1.98 ± 0.36 mm) was more extensive than that in the traditional group (1.73 ± 0.15 mm) (<em>p</em> = 0.049). As also, the ovarian artery diameter of the hybrid supplying pattern in the “cuff-sleeve” group (1.65 ± 0.25 mm) was significantly larger than that in the traditional group (1.50 ± 0.35 mm) (<em>p</em> = 0.010). Additionally, while the pregnancy rate in the “cuff-sleeve” group (50.0 %) was higher than that in the traditional group (25.0 %), this difference was not statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The “cuff-sleeve” suture method was associated with increased diameter of the uterine and ovarian vessels and may be a feasible method to improve the uterine blood supply and pregnancy rate after radical trachelectomy. It still warrants further evaluation for both fertility and oncologic outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001115/pdfft?md5=8735081a59f3b2df4969c70b8b575ae7&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001115-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 探讨 "袖套式 "缝合法在改善根治性气管切除术(RT)后子宫供血方面的可行性。研究设计 "袖套式 "组(25 例)和传统组(10 例)患者接受计算机断层扫描(CTA)以评估术后残余子宫供血模式,术前组患者(20 例)在术前接受 CTA 检查。结果 术前组 20 例患者的子宫均由双侧子宫动脉供血,平均直径为 2.25 ± 0.35 mm。子宫动脉供血、混合供血和卵巢动脉供血模式在 "袖带-袖套 "组分别占 40%、36% 和 24%,在传统组分别占 20%、50% 和 30%。袖带 "组子宫动脉供血模式的子宫动脉平均直径(1.98 ± 0.36 毫米)比传统组(1.73 ± 0.15 毫米)更宽(P = 0.049)。同样,"袖带-袖套 "组混合供血模式的卵巢动脉直径(1.65 ± 0.25 mm)也明显大于传统组(1.50 ± 0.35 mm)(P = 0.010)。结论 "袖套式 "缝合方法与子宫和卵巢血管直径的增加有关,可能是根治性气管切除术后改善子宫供血和妊娠率的可行方法。但仍需进一步评估其对生育和肿瘤的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility of the “cuff-sleeve” suture method in improving the uterine blood supply after radical trachelectomy: A retrospective analysis

Objective

To explore the feasibility of the “cuff-sleeve” suture method in improving the uterine blood supply after radical trachelectomy (RT).

Study design

Patients in the “cuff-sleeve” (n = 25) and traditional group (n = 10) underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) to evaluate the residual uterine blood supply pattern after the surgery, and the preoperative group patients (n = 20) underwent CTA before the procedure.

Results

The uteri of the 20 patients in the preoperative group were all supplied by bilateral uterine arteries of average diameter, 2.25 ± 0.35 mm. The uterine artery-supplying, hybrid supplying, and ovarian artery-supplying patterns accounted for 40 %, 36 %, and 24 % in the “cuff-sleeve” group and 20 %, 50 %, and 30 %, respectively, in the traditional group. The average diameter of the uterine arteries among the uterine artery-supplying pattern in the “cuff-sleeve” group (1.98 ± 0.36 mm) was more extensive than that in the traditional group (1.73 ± 0.15 mm) (p = 0.049). As also, the ovarian artery diameter of the hybrid supplying pattern in the “cuff-sleeve” group (1.65 ± 0.25 mm) was significantly larger than that in the traditional group (1.50 ± 0.35 mm) (p = 0.010). Additionally, while the pregnancy rate in the “cuff-sleeve” group (50.0 %) was higher than that in the traditional group (25.0 %), this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

The “cuff-sleeve” suture method was associated with increased diameter of the uterine and ovarian vessels and may be a feasible method to improve the uterine blood supply and pregnancy rate after radical trachelectomy. It still warrants further evaluation for both fertility and oncologic outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
When ovarian mature teratoma peritonitis mimics cancer: What is the best treatment? High Rates of Germline Pathogenic Variants in Somali Patients with Ovarian Cancer Sleep characteristics and recurrence in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer survivors: A prospective cohort study Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for metastatic ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A feasibility study Rehabilitation of pelvic floor dysfunction after radiation therapy for a rare gynecological cancer: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1