医疗保险支付趋势与麻醉服务通货膨胀率的比较

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111505
Caroline J. Liang B.S. , Jonathan S. Gal M.D. , Thomas R. Miller Ph.D. , Alexander A. Hannenberg M.D.
{"title":"医疗保险支付趋势与麻醉服务通货膨胀率的比较","authors":"Caroline J. Liang B.S. ,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Gal M.D. ,&nbsp;Thomas R. Miller Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Alexander A. Hannenberg M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>Identify changes and trends in the real value of Medicare payments for anesthesia services between 2000 and 2020 and how it may affect practices.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>We utilized the Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary (PSPS) datasets of Medicare Part B claims to identify high volume anesthesia services in 2020 with 20 years of data. The Consumer Price Index was used as a measure of inflation to adjust prices.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>The PSPS datasets contain summaries of all annual Medicare Part B claims and payment amounts by carrier and locality.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients receiving anesthesia services.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>For each service, identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, we trended the average Medicare payment per procedure from 2000 to 2020 and calculated year to year changes and compound annual growth rate (CAGR). We also evaluated base and time units for each CPT code and the national Medicare anesthesia conversion factor (CF) for the same years.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The average Medicare payment in the study sample increased 20.1% from 2000 to 2020. After adjusting for inflation, the average Medicare payment per anesthesia service decreased by 20.8% over that period. The Medicare anesthesia CF increased 24.9% in the same period, and after adjusting for inflation, the real value of the CF decreased 16.9%. Average CAGR across the 20 anesthesia services was 0.88%, compared to the average annual inflation at 2.06%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Average Medicare payment for common anesthesia services after adjusting for inflation have decreased from 2000 to 2020, consistent with findings in other physician specialties. Understanding these trends is important for practice viability and suggests significant financial implications for anesthesia practices and hospitals if the trend were to continue.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicare payment trends compared to inflation for anesthesia services\",\"authors\":\"Caroline J. Liang B.S. ,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Gal M.D. ,&nbsp;Thomas R. Miller Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Alexander A. Hannenberg M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>Identify changes and trends in the real value of Medicare payments for anesthesia services between 2000 and 2020 and how it may affect practices.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>We utilized the Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary (PSPS) datasets of Medicare Part B claims to identify high volume anesthesia services in 2020 with 20 years of data. The Consumer Price Index was used as a measure of inflation to adjust prices.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>The PSPS datasets contain summaries of all annual Medicare Part B claims and payment amounts by carrier and locality.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients receiving anesthesia services.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>For each service, identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, we trended the average Medicare payment per procedure from 2000 to 2020 and calculated year to year changes and compound annual growth rate (CAGR). We also evaluated base and time units for each CPT code and the national Medicare anesthesia conversion factor (CF) for the same years.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The average Medicare payment in the study sample increased 20.1% from 2000 to 2020. After adjusting for inflation, the average Medicare payment per anesthesia service decreased by 20.8% over that period. The Medicare anesthesia CF increased 24.9% in the same period, and after adjusting for inflation, the real value of the CF decreased 16.9%. Average CAGR across the 20 anesthesia services was 0.88%, compared to the average annual inflation at 2.06%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Average Medicare payment for common anesthesia services after adjusting for inflation have decreased from 2000 to 2020, consistent with findings in other physician specialties. Understanding these trends is important for practice viability and suggests significant financial implications for anesthesia practices and hospitals if the trend were to continue.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095281802400134X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095281802400134X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的确定 2000 年至 2020 年间医疗保险对麻醉服务支付的实际价值的变化和趋势,以及这种变化和趋势可能对医疗实践产生的影响。患者PSPS数据集包含所有年度医疗保险B部分报销申请摘要,以及按承保人和地区划分的支付金额。我们还评估了每个 CPT 代码的基数和时间单位以及同年的国家医疗保险麻醉转换系数 (CF)。主要结果研究样本中的平均医疗保险支付额从 2000 年到 2020 年增长了 20.1%。扣除通货膨胀因素后,医疗保险对每项麻醉服务的平均支付在此期间减少了 20.8%。同期,医疗保险麻醉 CF 增长了 24.9%,扣除通货膨胀因素后,CF 的实际价值下降了 16.9%。20 项麻醉服务的平均年复合增长率为 0.88%,而年平均通胀率为 2.06%。结论2000 年至 2020 年期间,医疗保险对常见麻醉服务的平均支付额在扣除通胀因素后有所下降,这与其他专科医师的研究结果一致。了解这些趋势对麻醉实践的可行性非常重要,并表明如果这一趋势持续下去,将对麻醉实践和医院产生重大的财务影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medicare payment trends compared to inflation for anesthesia services

Study objective

Identify changes and trends in the real value of Medicare payments for anesthesia services between 2000 and 2020 and how it may affect practices.

Design

Retrospective analysis.

Setting

We utilized the Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary (PSPS) datasets of Medicare Part B claims to identify high volume anesthesia services in 2020 with 20 years of data. The Consumer Price Index was used as a measure of inflation to adjust prices.

Patients

The PSPS datasets contain summaries of all annual Medicare Part B claims and payment amounts by carrier and locality.

Interventions

Patients receiving anesthesia services.

Measurements

For each service, identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, we trended the average Medicare payment per procedure from 2000 to 2020 and calculated year to year changes and compound annual growth rate (CAGR). We also evaluated base and time units for each CPT code and the national Medicare anesthesia conversion factor (CF) for the same years.

Main results

The average Medicare payment in the study sample increased 20.1% from 2000 to 2020. After adjusting for inflation, the average Medicare payment per anesthesia service decreased by 20.8% over that period. The Medicare anesthesia CF increased 24.9% in the same period, and after adjusting for inflation, the real value of the CF decreased 16.9%. Average CAGR across the 20 anesthesia services was 0.88%, compared to the average annual inflation at 2.06%.

Conclusions

Average Medicare payment for common anesthesia services after adjusting for inflation have decreased from 2000 to 2020, consistent with findings in other physician specialties. Understanding these trends is important for practice viability and suggests significant financial implications for anesthesia practices and hospitals if the trend were to continue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Benefit of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine on cognitive function following noncardiac surgery: An updated meta-analysis. Esketamine in postoperative recovery: Reliable for negative emotional relief, ambiguous for cognitive function. National trends in perioperative epidural analgesia use for surgical patients Response to comment on: “Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial” Letter to the editor regarding “Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1