基于营养指数的泛癌症患者预后模型:真实世界队列研究

IF 1.5 Q4 ONCOLOGY Cancer reports Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.2121
Lin Zheng, Qian-Qian Yu, Wen-Bin Ruan, Jin Chen, Qing-Hua Deng, Ke Zhang, Xu-Li Jiang, Wen-Jun Jiang, Dan-Na Cai, Chen-Jie He, Yu-Feng Wang, Shen-Li Jiang, Rui-Zhi Ye, Guang-Xian You, Rong-Biao Ying, Zhi-Rui Zhou
{"title":"基于营养指数的泛癌症患者预后模型:真实世界队列研究","authors":"Lin Zheng,&nbsp;Qian-Qian Yu,&nbsp;Wen-Bin Ruan,&nbsp;Jin Chen,&nbsp;Qing-Hua Deng,&nbsp;Ke Zhang,&nbsp;Xu-Li Jiang,&nbsp;Wen-Jun Jiang,&nbsp;Dan-Na Cai,&nbsp;Chen-Jie He,&nbsp;Yu-Feng Wang,&nbsp;Shen-Li Jiang,&nbsp;Rui-Zhi Ye,&nbsp;Guang-Xian You,&nbsp;Rong-Biao Ying,&nbsp;Zhi-Rui Zhou","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.2121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The aim was to identify the nutritional indexes, construct a prognostic model, and develop a nomogram for predicting individual survival probability in pan-cancers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Nutritional indicators, clinicopathological characteristics, and previous major treatment details of the patients were collected. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression cross-validation was used to determine the variables to include in the cox regression model. The training cohort was used to build the prediction model, and the validation cohort was used to further verify the discrimination, calibration, and clinical effectiveness of the model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 2020 patients were included. The median OS was 56.50 months (95% CI, 50.36–62.65 months). In the training cohort of 1425 patients, through Lasso regression cross-validation, 13 characteristics were included in the model. Cox proportional hazards model was developed and visualized as a nomogram. The <i>C</i>-indexes of the model for predicting 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS were 0.848, 0.826, 0.814, and 0.799 in the training cohort and 0.851, 0.819, 0.814, and 0.801 in the validation cohort. The model showed great calibration in the two cohorts. Patients with a score of less than 274.29 had a better prognosis (training cohort: HR, 6.932; 95% CI, 5.723–8.397; log-rank <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; validation cohort: HR, 8.429; 95% CI, 6.180–11.497; log-rank <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The prognostic model based on the nutritional indexes of pan-cancer can divide patients into different survival risk groups and performed well in the validation cohort.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnr2.2121","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prognostic Model Based on Nutritional Indexes for Patients With Pan-Cancer: A Real-World Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Lin Zheng,&nbsp;Qian-Qian Yu,&nbsp;Wen-Bin Ruan,&nbsp;Jin Chen,&nbsp;Qing-Hua Deng,&nbsp;Ke Zhang,&nbsp;Xu-Li Jiang,&nbsp;Wen-Jun Jiang,&nbsp;Dan-Na Cai,&nbsp;Chen-Jie He,&nbsp;Yu-Feng Wang,&nbsp;Shen-Li Jiang,&nbsp;Rui-Zhi Ye,&nbsp;Guang-Xian You,&nbsp;Rong-Biao Ying,&nbsp;Zhi-Rui Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnr2.2121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim was to identify the nutritional indexes, construct a prognostic model, and develop a nomogram for predicting individual survival probability in pan-cancers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nutritional indicators, clinicopathological characteristics, and previous major treatment details of the patients were collected. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression cross-validation was used to determine the variables to include in the cox regression model. The training cohort was used to build the prediction model, and the validation cohort was used to further verify the discrimination, calibration, and clinical effectiveness of the model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 2020 patients were included. The median OS was 56.50 months (95% CI, 50.36–62.65 months). In the training cohort of 1425 patients, through Lasso regression cross-validation, 13 characteristics were included in the model. Cox proportional hazards model was developed and visualized as a nomogram. The <i>C</i>-indexes of the model for predicting 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS were 0.848, 0.826, 0.814, and 0.799 in the training cohort and 0.851, 0.819, 0.814, and 0.801 in the validation cohort. The model showed great calibration in the two cohorts. Patients with a score of less than 274.29 had a better prognosis (training cohort: HR, 6.932; 95% CI, 5.723–8.397; log-rank <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; validation cohort: HR, 8.429; 95% CI, 6.180–11.497; log-rank <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The prognostic model based on the nutritional indexes of pan-cancer can divide patients into different survival risk groups and performed well in the validation cohort.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnr2.2121\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.2121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.2121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 本研究旨在确定泛癌患者的营养指标,构建预后模型,并开发用于预测个体生存概率的提名图。 方法 收集患者的营养指标、临床病理特征和既往主要治疗细节。将入组患者随机分为训练组和验证组。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(Lasso)回归交叉验证来确定纳入 cox 回归模型的变量。训练队列用于建立预测模型,验证队列用于进一步验证模型的区分度、校准和临床有效性。 结果 共纳入 2020 例患者。中位OS为56.50个月(95% CI,50.36-62.65个月)。在由 1425 名患者组成的训练队列中,通过拉索回归交叉验证,13 个特征被纳入模型。建立了 Cox 比例危险模型,并将其显示为提名图。该模型预测 1 年、3 年、5 年和 10 年 OS 的 C 指数在训练队列中分别为 0.848、0.826、0.814 和 0.799,在验证队列中分别为 0.851、0.819、0.814 和 0.801。该模型在两个队列中显示出很好的校准性。得分低于 274.29 分的患者预后较好(训练队列:HR,6.932;95% CI,5.723-8.397;log-rank p <;0.001;验证队列:HR,8.429;95% CI,6.180-11.497;log-rank p <;0.001)。 结论 基于泛癌营养指标的预后模型可将患者分为不同的生存风险组,并在验证队列中表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Prognostic Model Based on Nutritional Indexes for Patients With Pan-Cancer: A Real-World Cohort Study

Background

The aim was to identify the nutritional indexes, construct a prognostic model, and develop a nomogram for predicting individual survival probability in pan-cancers.

Methods

Nutritional indicators, clinicopathological characteristics, and previous major treatment details of the patients were collected. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression cross-validation was used to determine the variables to include in the cox regression model. The training cohort was used to build the prediction model, and the validation cohort was used to further verify the discrimination, calibration, and clinical effectiveness of the model.

Results

A total of 2020 patients were included. The median OS was 56.50 months (95% CI, 50.36–62.65 months). In the training cohort of 1425 patients, through Lasso regression cross-validation, 13 characteristics were included in the model. Cox proportional hazards model was developed and visualized as a nomogram. The C-indexes of the model for predicting 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS were 0.848, 0.826, 0.814, and 0.799 in the training cohort and 0.851, 0.819, 0.814, and 0.801 in the validation cohort. The model showed great calibration in the two cohorts. Patients with a score of less than 274.29 had a better prognosis (training cohort: HR, 6.932; 95% CI, 5.723–8.397; log-rank p < 0.001; validation cohort: HR, 8.429; 95% CI, 6.180–11.497; log-rank p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The prognostic model based on the nutritional indexes of pan-cancer can divide patients into different survival risk groups and performed well in the validation cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Wilms Tumour Epidemiology, Clinicopathological Features and Treatment Outcomes in 84 Moroccan Patients. Definite Treatment Delay With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Longitudinal Monitoring by Circulating Tumor DNA for Advanced Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy: A Case Series and Literature Review. Impact of Age and Gender on Survival of Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Significant Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Therapy and Curative Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer: Surgical and Oncological Outcomes From a Retrospective Cohort Study. Total Minimally Invasive Curative Staged Resections After Induction Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Rectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1