ST段抬高型心肌梗死后冠状动脉旁路移植术的时机会影响早期和长期预后吗?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787851
Jagdip Kang, Mateo Marin-Cuartas, Luise Auerswald, Salil V Deo, Michael Borger, Piroze Davierwala, Alexander Verevkin
{"title":"ST段抬高型心肌梗死后冠状动脉旁路移植术的时机会影响早期和长期预后吗?","authors":"Jagdip Kang, Mateo Marin-Cuartas, Luise Auerswald, Salil V Deo, Michael Borger, Piroze Davierwala, Alexander Verevkin","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The optimal timing of surgical revascularization after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is controversial, with some suggesting higher mortality rates in patients undergoing early surgery. The aim of the study is to determine the effect of the timing of surgical revascularization on 30-day mortality and long-term outcomes in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Retrospective single-center analysis of patients with STEMI undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between January 2008 and December 2019 at our institution. The cohort was split into three groups based on time from symptom onset until surgical revascularization (Group 1: <12 hours, Group 2: 12-72 hours, Group 3: >72 hours). Statistical analyses were performed with and without patients in cardiogenic shock. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 10-year survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> During the study period, 437 consecutive patients underwent surgical revascularization in the setting of STEMI. The mean age was 67.0 years, 96 (22.0%) patients were female, and 281 (64.3%) patients underwent off-pump CABG. The overall 30-day mortality including patients with cardiogenic shock was 12.8%. The 30-day mortality was 16.1, 13.9, and 9.3% in Groups 1, 2, and 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.31), whereas 10-year survival was 48.5, 57.3, and 54.9% (log-rank: <i>p</i> = 0.40). After exclusion of patients in cardiogenic shock, there was no difference between the three groups in 30-day and 10-year mortality. Timing of surgery had no influence on early- and long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In patients with STEMI, early surgical revascularization achieved similar early- and long-term survival rates compared with a delayed surgical revascularization strategy. Hence, when indicated, an early CABG strategy has no disadvantages in comparison to a delayed strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Timing of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Impact Early- and Long-Term Outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"Jagdip Kang, Mateo Marin-Cuartas, Luise Auerswald, Salil V Deo, Michael Borger, Piroze Davierwala, Alexander Verevkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1787851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The optimal timing of surgical revascularization after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is controversial, with some suggesting higher mortality rates in patients undergoing early surgery. The aim of the study is to determine the effect of the timing of surgical revascularization on 30-day mortality and long-term outcomes in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Retrospective single-center analysis of patients with STEMI undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between January 2008 and December 2019 at our institution. The cohort was split into three groups based on time from symptom onset until surgical revascularization (Group 1: <12 hours, Group 2: 12-72 hours, Group 3: >72 hours). Statistical analyses were performed with and without patients in cardiogenic shock. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 10-year survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> During the study period, 437 consecutive patients underwent surgical revascularization in the setting of STEMI. The mean age was 67.0 years, 96 (22.0%) patients were female, and 281 (64.3%) patients underwent off-pump CABG. The overall 30-day mortality including patients with cardiogenic shock was 12.8%. The 30-day mortality was 16.1, 13.9, and 9.3% in Groups 1, 2, and 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.31), whereas 10-year survival was 48.5, 57.3, and 54.9% (log-rank: <i>p</i> = 0.40). After exclusion of patients in cardiogenic shock, there was no difference between the three groups in 30-day and 10-year mortality. Timing of surgery had no influence on early- and long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In patients with STEMI, early surgical revascularization achieved similar early- and long-term survival rates compared with a delayed surgical revascularization strategy. Hence, when indicated, an early CABG strategy has no disadvantages in comparison to a delayed strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787851\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787851","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后手术血管再通的最佳时机尚存争议,有些人认为早期手术的患者死亡率更高。本研究旨在确定手术血管重建时机对这些患者 30 天死亡率和长期预后的影响:方法:对2008年1月至2019年12月期间在本院接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的STEMI患者进行回顾性单中心分析。根据从症状出现到手术血管再通的时间(第1组:72小时)将患者分为三组。统计分析包括和不包括心源性休克患者。主要结果为30天死亡率和10年生存率:在研究期间,共有 437 名 STEMI 患者连续接受了血管重建手术。平均年龄为 67.0 岁,96 名(22.0%)患者为女性,281 名(64.3%)患者接受了非泵 CABG。包括心源性休克患者在内的 30 天总死亡率为 12.8%。第 1、2 和 3 组的 30 天死亡率分别为 16.1%、13.9% 和 9.3%(P = 0.31),而 10 年生存率分别为 48.5%、57.3% 和 54.9%(对数秩:P = 0.40)。排除心源性休克患者后,三组患者的 30 天和 10 年死亡率没有差异。手术时机对早期和长期存活率没有影响:结论:在 STEMI 患者中,早期手术血管重建与延迟手术血管重建策略相比,早期和长期存活率相似。因此,如果有必要,早期 CABG 策略与延迟策略相比并无劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Timing of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Impact Early- and Long-Term Outcomes?

Background:  The optimal timing of surgical revascularization after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is controversial, with some suggesting higher mortality rates in patients undergoing early surgery. The aim of the study is to determine the effect of the timing of surgical revascularization on 30-day mortality and long-term outcomes in these patients.

Methods:  Retrospective single-center analysis of patients with STEMI undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between January 2008 and December 2019 at our institution. The cohort was split into three groups based on time from symptom onset until surgical revascularization (Group 1: <12 hours, Group 2: 12-72 hours, Group 3: >72 hours). Statistical analyses were performed with and without patients in cardiogenic shock. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 10-year survival.

Results:  During the study period, 437 consecutive patients underwent surgical revascularization in the setting of STEMI. The mean age was 67.0 years, 96 (22.0%) patients were female, and 281 (64.3%) patients underwent off-pump CABG. The overall 30-day mortality including patients with cardiogenic shock was 12.8%. The 30-day mortality was 16.1, 13.9, and 9.3% in Groups 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.31), whereas 10-year survival was 48.5, 57.3, and 54.9% (log-rank: p = 0.40). After exclusion of patients in cardiogenic shock, there was no difference between the three groups in 30-day and 10-year mortality. Timing of surgery had no influence on early- and long-term survival.

Conclusion:  In patients with STEMI, early surgical revascularization achieved similar early- and long-term survival rates compared with a delayed surgical revascularization strategy. Hence, when indicated, an early CABG strategy has no disadvantages in comparison to a delayed strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field. Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.
期刊最新文献
Transapical Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation with the Tendyne Valve: The Swiss Experience. Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery in the Elderly. New Insights into Mortality-Related Risk Factors in Infective Endocarditis: Results from the Brandenburg State Endocarditis Register. Long-Term Outcome of Chest Wall and Diaphragm Repair with Biological Materials. Natural Sequential Collapse Method: A Common Technique to Identify the Intersegmental Plane.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1