术前 CT 可改善对转子髋部骨折稳定性的评估。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Open Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1302/2633-1462.56.BJO-2023-0177.R1
Thomas A Woldeyesus, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Ingvild Dalen, Terje Meling, Mehdi Behzadi, Knut Harboe, Ane Djuv
{"title":"术前 CT 可改善对转子髋部骨折稳定性的评估。","authors":"Thomas A Woldeyesus, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Ingvild Dalen, Terje Meling, Mehdi Behzadi, Knut Harboe, Ane Djuv","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.56.BJO-2023-0177.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate if preoperative CT improves detection of unstable trochanteric hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre prospective study was conducted. Patients aged 65 years or older with trochanteric hip fractures admitted to Stavanger University Hospital (Stavanger, Norway) were consecutively included from September 2020 to January 2022. Radiographs and CT images of the fractures were obtained, and surgeons made individual assessments of the fractures based on these. The assessment was conducted according to a systematic protocol including three classification systems (AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), Evans Jensen (EVJ), and Nakano) and questions addressing specific fracture patterns. An expert group provided a gold-standard assessment based on the CT images. Sensitivities and specificities of surgeons' assessments were estimated and compared in regression models with correlations for the same patients. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were presented as Cohen's kappa and Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 120 fractures in 119 patients. Compared to radiographs, CT increased the sensitivity of detecting unstable trochanteric fractures from 63% to 70% (p = 0.028) and from 70% to 76% (p = 0.004) using AO/OTA and EVJ, respectively. Compared to radiographs alone, CT increased the sensitivity of detecting a large posterolateral trochanter major fragment or a comminuted trochanter major fragment from 63% to 76% (p = 0.002) and from 38% to 55% (p < 0.001), respectively. CT improved intra-rater reliability for stability assessment using EVJ (AC1 0.68 to 0.78; p = 0.049) and for detecting a large posterolateral trochanter major fragment (AC1 0.42 to 0.57; p = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A preoperative CT of trochanteric fractures increased detection of unstable fractures using the AO/OTA and EVJ classification systems. Compared to radiographs, CT improved intra-rater reliability when assessing fracture stability and detecting large posterolateral trochanter major fragments.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 6","pages":"524-531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11194626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative CT improves the assessment of stability in trochanteric hip fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas A Woldeyesus, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Ingvild Dalen, Terje Meling, Mehdi Behzadi, Knut Harboe, Ane Djuv\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.56.BJO-2023-0177.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate if preoperative CT improves detection of unstable trochanteric hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre prospective study was conducted. Patients aged 65 years or older with trochanteric hip fractures admitted to Stavanger University Hospital (Stavanger, Norway) were consecutively included from September 2020 to January 2022. Radiographs and CT images of the fractures were obtained, and surgeons made individual assessments of the fractures based on these. The assessment was conducted according to a systematic protocol including three classification systems (AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), Evans Jensen (EVJ), and Nakano) and questions addressing specific fracture patterns. An expert group provided a gold-standard assessment based on the CT images. Sensitivities and specificities of surgeons' assessments were estimated and compared in regression models with correlations for the same patients. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were presented as Cohen's kappa and Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 120 fractures in 119 patients. Compared to radiographs, CT increased the sensitivity of detecting unstable trochanteric fractures from 63% to 70% (p = 0.028) and from 70% to 76% (p = 0.004) using AO/OTA and EVJ, respectively. Compared to radiographs alone, CT increased the sensitivity of detecting a large posterolateral trochanter major fragment or a comminuted trochanter major fragment from 63% to 76% (p = 0.002) and from 38% to 55% (p < 0.001), respectively. CT improved intra-rater reliability for stability assessment using EVJ (AC1 0.68 to 0.78; p = 0.049) and for detecting a large posterolateral trochanter major fragment (AC1 0.42 to 0.57; p = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A preoperative CT of trochanteric fractures increased detection of unstable fractures using the AO/OTA and EVJ classification systems. Compared to radiographs, CT improved intra-rater reliability when assessing fracture stability and detecting large posterolateral trochanter major fragments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"524-531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11194626/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.56.BJO-2023-0177.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.56.BJO-2023-0177.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究术前 CT 是否能改善不稳定转子髋部骨折的检测:进行了一项单中心前瞻性研究。研究连续纳入了 2020 年 9 月至 2022 年 1 月期间入住斯塔万格大学医院(挪威斯塔万格)的 65 岁或以上髋部转子骨折患者。他们获得了骨折的X光片和CT图像,外科医生根据这些图像对骨折进行了单独评估。评估根据系统性协议进行,包括三种分类系统(AO/矫形外科创伤协会(OTA)、埃文斯-詹森(EVJ)和中野)以及针对特定骨折模式的问题。专家组根据 CT 图像提供黄金标准评估。对外科医生评估的敏感性和特异性进行了估算,并在回归模型中对相同患者的相关性进行了比较。评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性以 Cohen's kappa 和 Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC1) 表示:结果:我们共对 119 名患者的 120 处骨折进行了检查。与X光片相比,使用AO/OTA和EVJ,CT检测不稳定转子骨折的灵敏度分别从63%提高到70%(p = 0.028)和从70%提高到76%(p = 0.004)。与单纯X光片相比,CT可提高检测大的转子后外侧主要骨折片或粉碎性转子主要骨折片的灵敏度,分别从63%提高到76%(p = 0.002)和从38%提高到55%(p < 0.001)。CT提高了使用EVJ评估稳定性(AC1为0.68至0.78;p = 0.049)和检测大的转子后外侧主要碎片(AC1为0.42至0.57;p = 0.031)的评分者内部可靠性:结论:采用AO/OTA和EVJ分类系统对转子骨折进行术前CT检查可提高不稳定骨折的检出率。与X光片相比,CT在评估骨折稳定性和检测大的转子后外侧主要碎片时提高了评分者内部的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preoperative CT improves the assessment of stability in trochanteric hip fractures.

Aims: To investigate if preoperative CT improves detection of unstable trochanteric hip fractures.

Methods: A single-centre prospective study was conducted. Patients aged 65 years or older with trochanteric hip fractures admitted to Stavanger University Hospital (Stavanger, Norway) were consecutively included from September 2020 to January 2022. Radiographs and CT images of the fractures were obtained, and surgeons made individual assessments of the fractures based on these. The assessment was conducted according to a systematic protocol including three classification systems (AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), Evans Jensen (EVJ), and Nakano) and questions addressing specific fracture patterns. An expert group provided a gold-standard assessment based on the CT images. Sensitivities and specificities of surgeons' assessments were estimated and compared in regression models with correlations for the same patients. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were presented as Cohen's kappa and Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC1).

Results: We included 120 fractures in 119 patients. Compared to radiographs, CT increased the sensitivity of detecting unstable trochanteric fractures from 63% to 70% (p = 0.028) and from 70% to 76% (p = 0.004) using AO/OTA and EVJ, respectively. Compared to radiographs alone, CT increased the sensitivity of detecting a large posterolateral trochanter major fragment or a comminuted trochanter major fragment from 63% to 76% (p = 0.002) and from 38% to 55% (p < 0.001), respectively. CT improved intra-rater reliability for stability assessment using EVJ (AC1 0.68 to 0.78; p = 0.049) and for detecting a large posterolateral trochanter major fragment (AC1 0.42 to 0.57; p = 0.031).

Conclusion: A preoperative CT of trochanteric fractures increased detection of unstable fractures using the AO/OTA and EVJ classification systems. Compared to radiographs, CT improved intra-rater reliability when assessing fracture stability and detecting large posterolateral trochanter major fragments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus arthroscopic Latarjet for anterior shoulder instability in adolescents. Revisiting the radiological signs for the first metatarsal pronation assessment. Clinical outcomes after extra-articular resection of hip joint tumour using a custom-made osteotomy guide and 3D-printed endoprosthesis with posterior column preserved. Uncompromised total knee arthroplasty function after distal femoral osteotomy. Outcomes of external versus internal fixation for traumatic lower limb fractures in low- and middle-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1