精神分裂症与风险偏好:双向双样本泯灭随机研究。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1007/s00406-024-01853-5
Yixin Zhao, Weilong Guo, Jiansong Zhou, Xiaoping Wang
{"title":"精神分裂症与风险偏好:双向双样本泯灭随机研究。","authors":"Yixin Zhao, Weilong Guo, Jiansong Zhou, Xiaoping Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00406-024-01853-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing evidence shows that risk preference is associated with schizophrenia. However, the causality and direction of this association are not clear; Therefore, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to examine the potential bidirectional relationship between risk preference and schizophrenia. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data on risk preference of 939,908 participants from the UK Biobank and 23andMe were used to identify general risk preference. Data from 320,404 subjects (76,755 cases and 243,649 controls) from The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium were used to identify schizophrenia. The weighted median (WM), the inverse variance weighted (IVW), and the Mendelian randomization-Egger (MR-Egger) methods were used for the MR analysis to estimate the causal effect and detect the directional pleiotropy. The GWAS summary data were respectively from two combined samples, containing 939,908 and 320,404 subjects of European ancestry. Mendelian randomization evidence suggested that risk preference was associated with increased onset of schizophrenia (OR = 2.84, 95CI%: 1.77-4.56, P = 1.58*10 - 5) and that schizophrenia was also associated with raised risk preference (OR = 1.11, 95CI%: 1.07-1.15, P = 7.98*10 - 8). With the use of large-scale GWAS data, robust evidence suggests an interaction between risk preference and schizophrenia. This also indicates that early identification of and intervention for increased risk preference may improve the prognosis of schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11822,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schizophrenia and risk preference: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study.\",\"authors\":\"Yixin Zhao, Weilong Guo, Jiansong Zhou, Xiaoping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00406-024-01853-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Increasing evidence shows that risk preference is associated with schizophrenia. However, the causality and direction of this association are not clear; Therefore, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to examine the potential bidirectional relationship between risk preference and schizophrenia. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data on risk preference of 939,908 participants from the UK Biobank and 23andMe were used to identify general risk preference. Data from 320,404 subjects (76,755 cases and 243,649 controls) from The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium were used to identify schizophrenia. The weighted median (WM), the inverse variance weighted (IVW), and the Mendelian randomization-Egger (MR-Egger) methods were used for the MR analysis to estimate the causal effect and detect the directional pleiotropy. The GWAS summary data were respectively from two combined samples, containing 939,908 and 320,404 subjects of European ancestry. Mendelian randomization evidence suggested that risk preference was associated with increased onset of schizophrenia (OR = 2.84, 95CI%: 1.77-4.56, P = 1.58*10 - 5) and that schizophrenia was also associated with raised risk preference (OR = 1.11, 95CI%: 1.07-1.15, P = 7.98*10 - 8). With the use of large-scale GWAS data, robust evidence suggests an interaction between risk preference and schizophrenia. This also indicates that early identification of and intervention for increased risk preference may improve the prognosis of schizophrenia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01853-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01853-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,风险偏好与精神分裂症有关。然而,这种关联的因果关系和方向并不明确;因此,我们使用孟德尔随机化(MR)来研究风险偏好与精神分裂症之间的潜在双向关系。全基因组关联研究(GWAS)汇总了来自英国生物库和 23andMe 的 939,908 名参与者的风险偏好数据,用于识别一般风险偏好。来自精神疾病基因组学联合会的 320,404 名受试者(76,755 例病例和 243,649 例对照)的数据被用来识别精神分裂症。加权中值法(WM)、反方差加权法(IVW)和孟德尔随机化-艾格法(MR-Egger)被用于MR分析,以估计因果效应和检测方向性多向性。GWAS 的汇总数据分别来自两个合并样本,其中包含 939 908 和 320 404 名欧洲血统受试者。孟德尔随机化证据表明,风险偏好与精神分裂症发病率升高有关(OR = 2.84,95CI%:1.77-4.56,P = 1.58*10 - 5),精神分裂症也与风险偏好升高有关(OR = 1.11,95CI%:1.07-1.15,P = 7.98*10 - 8)。利用大规模的基因组学分析数据,有力的证据表明风险偏好与精神分裂症之间存在相互作用。这也表明,早期识别和干预风险偏好的增加可能会改善精神分裂症的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Schizophrenia and risk preference: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study.

Increasing evidence shows that risk preference is associated with schizophrenia. However, the causality and direction of this association are not clear; Therefore, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to examine the potential bidirectional relationship between risk preference and schizophrenia. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data on risk preference of 939,908 participants from the UK Biobank and 23andMe were used to identify general risk preference. Data from 320,404 subjects (76,755 cases and 243,649 controls) from The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium were used to identify schizophrenia. The weighted median (WM), the inverse variance weighted (IVW), and the Mendelian randomization-Egger (MR-Egger) methods were used for the MR analysis to estimate the causal effect and detect the directional pleiotropy. The GWAS summary data were respectively from two combined samples, containing 939,908 and 320,404 subjects of European ancestry. Mendelian randomization evidence suggested that risk preference was associated with increased onset of schizophrenia (OR = 2.84, 95CI%: 1.77-4.56, P = 1.58*10 - 5) and that schizophrenia was also associated with raised risk preference (OR = 1.11, 95CI%: 1.07-1.15, P = 7.98*10 - 8). With the use of large-scale GWAS data, robust evidence suggests an interaction between risk preference and schizophrenia. This also indicates that early identification of and intervention for increased risk preference may improve the prognosis of schizophrenia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The original papers published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience deal with all aspects of psychiatry and related clinical neuroscience. Clinical psychiatry, psychopathology, epidemiology as well as brain imaging, neuropathological, neurophysiological, neurochemical and moleculargenetic studies of psychiatric disorders are among the topics covered. Thus both the clinician and the neuroscientist are provided with a handy source of information on important scientific developments.
期刊最新文献
Episodic memory impairment and its influencing factors in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis Hemispheric asymmetries in borderline personality disorder: a systematic review Post-COVID syndrome - novel clinical findings. Nightmare frequency and nightmare distress in psychiatric inpatients. The critical role of primary care providers in addressing suicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1