科维德-19 大流行期间加拿大成年人的远程工作和 24 小时移动行为。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Preventive medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108053
Stephanie A. Prince , Aviroop Biswas , Marisol T. Betancourt , Stephanie Toigo , Karen C. Roberts , Rachel C. Colley , Shawn Brule , Jean-Philippe Chaput , Justin J. Lang
{"title":"科维德-19 大流行期间加拿大成年人的远程工作和 24 小时移动行为。","authors":"Stephanie A. Prince ,&nbsp;Aviroop Biswas ,&nbsp;Marisol T. Betancourt ,&nbsp;Stephanie Toigo ,&nbsp;Karen C. Roberts ,&nbsp;Rachel C. Colley ,&nbsp;Shawn Brule ,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Chaput ,&nbsp;Justin J. Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the association between work location and movement behaviours (physical activity [PA], screen time, sleep) and adherence to the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines (24-H Guidelines) among Canadian workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using cross-sectional data from the 2021 Canadian Community Health Survey (<em>n</em> = 10,913 working adults 18–75 years), primary work location was categorized as: worked outside the home at a fixed location (fixed workplace), worked at home (telework), and worked outside the home at no fixed location (non-fixed workplace). Recreational, transportation and occupational/household PA, as well as leisure screen time and sleep duration were self-reported. Logistic regression assessed associations between work location and adherence to movement behaviour recommendations, adjusting for covariates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to a fixed workplace, those teleworking reported more recreational PA (21.1 vs 17.0 min/day, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) and sleep (7.2 vs 7.1 h/night, <em>p</em> = 0.026) and were more likely to meet sleep duration recommendations (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.08–1.51) and the 24-H Guidelines (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.04–1.51). Compared to fixed workplaces, those at non-fixed workplaces reported more occupational PA (62.7 vs 32.8 min/day, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) and less leisure screen time (2.5 vs 2.7 h/day, <em>p</em> = 0.021), and were more likely to meet the PA recommendation (aOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.15–1.85) and the 24-H Guidelines (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09–1.75).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results suggest that adherence to the 24-H Guidelines varies by work location, and work location should be considered when developing strategies to promote healthy movement behaviours. Future studies could explore hybrid work arrangements, and longitudinal study designs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telework and 24-hour movement behaviours among adults living in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie A. Prince ,&nbsp;Aviroop Biswas ,&nbsp;Marisol T. Betancourt ,&nbsp;Stephanie Toigo ,&nbsp;Karen C. Roberts ,&nbsp;Rachel C. Colley ,&nbsp;Shawn Brule ,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Chaput ,&nbsp;Justin J. Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the association between work location and movement behaviours (physical activity [PA], screen time, sleep) and adherence to the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines (24-H Guidelines) among Canadian workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using cross-sectional data from the 2021 Canadian Community Health Survey (<em>n</em> = 10,913 working adults 18–75 years), primary work location was categorized as: worked outside the home at a fixed location (fixed workplace), worked at home (telework), and worked outside the home at no fixed location (non-fixed workplace). Recreational, transportation and occupational/household PA, as well as leisure screen time and sleep duration were self-reported. Logistic regression assessed associations between work location and adherence to movement behaviour recommendations, adjusting for covariates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to a fixed workplace, those teleworking reported more recreational PA (21.1 vs 17.0 min/day, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) and sleep (7.2 vs 7.1 h/night, <em>p</em> = 0.026) and were more likely to meet sleep duration recommendations (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.08–1.51) and the 24-H Guidelines (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.04–1.51). Compared to fixed workplaces, those at non-fixed workplaces reported more occupational PA (62.7 vs 32.8 min/day, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) and less leisure screen time (2.5 vs 2.7 h/day, <em>p</em> = 0.021), and were more likely to meet the PA recommendation (aOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.15–1.85) and the 24-H Guidelines (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09–1.75).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results suggest that adherence to the 24-H Guidelines varies by work location, and work location should be considered when developing strategies to promote healthy movement behaviours. Future studies could explore hybrid work arrangements, and longitudinal study designs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002081\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估工作地点与运动行为(身体活动[PA]、屏幕时间、睡眠)之间的关系,以及在科威德-19大流行期间加拿大工人遵守《加拿大24小时运动指南》(24-H指南)的情况:利用 2021 年加拿大社区健康调查的横截面数据(n = 10,913 名 18-75 岁的工作成年人),将主要工作地点分为:在固定地点外出工作(固定工作场所)、在家工作(远程工作)和无固定地点外出工作(非固定工作场所)。娱乐、交通和职业/家庭活动量以及休闲屏幕时间和睡眠时间均为自我报告。逻辑回归评估了工作地点与坚持运动行为建议之间的关系,并对协变量进行了调整:结果:与固定工作场所相比,远程工作的人报告了更多的娱乐性 PA(21.1 分钟/天 vs 17.0 分钟/天,p 结论:结果表明,在远程工作的人中,有更多的人坚持运动行为建议:结果表明,工作地点不同,对《24 小时指南》的遵守程度也不同,因此在制定促进健康运动行为的策略时应考虑工作地点。未来的研究可以探索混合工作安排和纵向研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telework and 24-hour movement behaviours among adults living in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective

To assess the association between work location and movement behaviours (physical activity [PA], screen time, sleep) and adherence to the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines (24-H Guidelines) among Canadian workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Using cross-sectional data from the 2021 Canadian Community Health Survey (n = 10,913 working adults 18–75 years), primary work location was categorized as: worked outside the home at a fixed location (fixed workplace), worked at home (telework), and worked outside the home at no fixed location (non-fixed workplace). Recreational, transportation and occupational/household PA, as well as leisure screen time and sleep duration were self-reported. Logistic regression assessed associations between work location and adherence to movement behaviour recommendations, adjusting for covariates.

Results

Compared to a fixed workplace, those teleworking reported more recreational PA (21.1 vs 17.0 min/day, p < 0.0001) and sleep (7.2 vs 7.1 h/night, p = 0.026) and were more likely to meet sleep duration recommendations (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.08–1.51) and the 24-H Guidelines (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.04–1.51). Compared to fixed workplaces, those at non-fixed workplaces reported more occupational PA (62.7 vs 32.8 min/day, p < 0.0001) and less leisure screen time (2.5 vs 2.7 h/day, p = 0.021), and were more likely to meet the PA recommendation (aOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.15–1.85) and the 24-H Guidelines (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09–1.75).

Conclusions

Results suggest that adherence to the 24-H Guidelines varies by work location, and work location should be considered when developing strategies to promote healthy movement behaviours. Future studies could explore hybrid work arrangements, and longitudinal study designs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Behavior change, health, and health disparities 2024: Smoking and other tobacco use among women and girls. Association between self-reported child maltreatment and risk of hospital-treated infectious diseases in middle-aged and older adults: A UK Biobank cohort study. Fish oil supplementation, genetic susceptibility and risk of new-onset hypertension. Assessing the association between cigarette smoking and blood C-reactive protein levels using restructured cohort data Organized cervical cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of sending invitation letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1