阿拉巴马州社区药剂师对芬太尼试纸的了解和看法:横断面调查。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2024.102148
Shannon Woods, Erin Blythe, Giovanna Valle-Ramos, Jessica Richardson, Karen Pham, Kavon Diggs, Klaudia Harris, Yi Zhao, Lindsey Hohmann
{"title":"阿拉巴马州社区药剂师对芬太尼试纸的了解和看法:横断面调查。","authors":"Shannon Woods, Erin Blythe, Giovanna Valle-Ramos, Jessica Richardson, Karen Pham, Kavon Diggs, Klaudia Harris, Yi Zhao, Lindsey Hohmann","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are used to detect the presence of fentanyl in other substances, but Alabama pharmacists' opinions regarding FTS provision are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and perceptions of Alabama pharmacists regarding FTS and factors influencing pharmacists' FTS provision intentions across community pharmacy locations and types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous cross-sectional survey was distributed via email to Alabama pharmacists employed in community (retail) pharmacies. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions and 5-point Likert-type scales (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Primary outcome measures included: knowledge; general attitudes; perceived benefits; perceived barriers; self-efficacy; subjective norms; perceived behavioral control (PBC); and intention regarding FTS provision. Outcomes were characterized using descriptive statistics and differences in scales scores across pharmacy locations (rural vs. urban) and types (corporately-vs. independently-owned) were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Predictors of FTS provision intentions were evaluated using multiple linear regression (alpha=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents (N = 131; 3.82% response rate) were mostly female (64%) and Caucasian (92%). No respondents stocked FTS at their pharmacy and knowledge about FTS was low (mean[SD] knowledge score: 58.7% [15.1]). Despite the existence of perceived barriers (mean [SD] scale score: 3.2 [0.6]), pharmacists' general attitudes (3.4 [0.5]), perceived benefits (3.7 [0.6]), self-efficacy (3.1 [0.8]), and intentions (3.2[0.7]) were positive. While subjective norms were positive (3.5[0.6]), PBC over FTS decision-making was negative (2.7[0.8]). Subjective norms were higher (P = 0.040) and PBC was lower (P < 0.001) amongst corporately-versus independently-owned pharmacies, but no differences existed between rural and urban locations for any measures. Additionally, perceived benefits (β=0.342, P = 0.002), PBC (β = 0.133, P = 0.045), and self-efficacy (β = 0.142, P = 0.034) were positive predictors and perceived barriers (β = -0.211, P = 0.029) was a negative predictor of intention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alabama community pharmacists have positive attitudes regarding FTS, but future research should focus on strategies to increase PBC and overcome perceived barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alabama community pharmacists' knowledge and perceptions regarding fentanyl test strips: A cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Shannon Woods, Erin Blythe, Giovanna Valle-Ramos, Jessica Richardson, Karen Pham, Kavon Diggs, Klaudia Harris, Yi Zhao, Lindsey Hohmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are used to detect the presence of fentanyl in other substances, but Alabama pharmacists' opinions regarding FTS provision are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and perceptions of Alabama pharmacists regarding FTS and factors influencing pharmacists' FTS provision intentions across community pharmacy locations and types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous cross-sectional survey was distributed via email to Alabama pharmacists employed in community (retail) pharmacies. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions and 5-point Likert-type scales (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Primary outcome measures included: knowledge; general attitudes; perceived benefits; perceived barriers; self-efficacy; subjective norms; perceived behavioral control (PBC); and intention regarding FTS provision. Outcomes were characterized using descriptive statistics and differences in scales scores across pharmacy locations (rural vs. urban) and types (corporately-vs. independently-owned) were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Predictors of FTS provision intentions were evaluated using multiple linear regression (alpha=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents (N = 131; 3.82% response rate) were mostly female (64%) and Caucasian (92%). No respondents stocked FTS at their pharmacy and knowledge about FTS was low (mean[SD] knowledge score: 58.7% [15.1]). Despite the existence of perceived barriers (mean [SD] scale score: 3.2 [0.6]), pharmacists' general attitudes (3.4 [0.5]), perceived benefits (3.7 [0.6]), self-efficacy (3.1 [0.8]), and intentions (3.2[0.7]) were positive. While subjective norms were positive (3.5[0.6]), PBC over FTS decision-making was negative (2.7[0.8]). Subjective norms were higher (P = 0.040) and PBC was lower (P < 0.001) amongst corporately-versus independently-owned pharmacies, but no differences existed between rural and urban locations for any measures. Additionally, perceived benefits (β=0.342, P = 0.002), PBC (β = 0.133, P = 0.045), and self-efficacy (β = 0.142, P = 0.034) were positive predictors and perceived barriers (β = -0.211, P = 0.029) was a negative predictor of intention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alabama community pharmacists have positive attitudes regarding FTS, but future research should focus on strategies to increase PBC and overcome perceived barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2024.102148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2024.102148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:芬太尼试纸(FTS)用于检测其他物质中是否含有芬太尼,但阿拉巴马州药剂师对提供 FTS 的看法尚不清楚:本研究旨在评估阿拉巴马州药剂师对 FTS 的了解和看法,以及影响不同社区药房地点和类型的药剂师提供 FTS 意愿的因素:通过电子邮件向阿拉巴马州社区(零售)药店的药剂师发放匿名横截面调查问卷。调查包括多项选择题和 5 点李克特量表(1=非常不同意,5=非常同意),并参考了计划行为理论。主要结果测量指标包括:知识、一般态度、感知益处、感知障碍、自我效能、主观规范、感知行为控制(PBC)以及对提供 FTS 的意向。研究结果采用描述性统计方法进行描述,并采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验法评估不同药房地点(农村与城市)和类型(公司所有与独立所有)之间的量表评分差异。使用多元线性回归(alpha=0.05)评估了提供免费医疗服务意向的预测因素:受访者(131 人;回复率 3.82%)大多为女性(64%)和白种人(92%)。没有受访者的药房有 FTS 库存,对 FTS 的了解程度也较低(平均[标度]知识得分:58.7%[15.1])。尽管存在感知障碍(平均[标码]量表得分:3.2[0.6]),但药剂师的总体态度(3.4[0.5])、感知益处(3.7[0.6])、自我效能(3.1[0.8])和意向(3.2[0.7])都是积极的。虽然主观规范是积极的(3.5[0.6]),但 PBC 相对于 FTS 决策是消极的(2.7[0.8])。主观标准较高(p=0.040),而 PBC 较低(p结论:阿拉巴马州的社区药剂师对 FTS 持积极态度,但未来的研究应侧重于提高 PBC 和克服感知障碍的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alabama community pharmacists' knowledge and perceptions regarding fentanyl test strips: A cross-sectional survey.

Background: Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are used to detect the presence of fentanyl in other substances, but Alabama pharmacists' opinions regarding FTS provision are unknown.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and perceptions of Alabama pharmacists regarding FTS and factors influencing pharmacists' FTS provision intentions across community pharmacy locations and types.

Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional survey was distributed via email to Alabama pharmacists employed in community (retail) pharmacies. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions and 5-point Likert-type scales (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Primary outcome measures included: knowledge; general attitudes; perceived benefits; perceived barriers; self-efficacy; subjective norms; perceived behavioral control (PBC); and intention regarding FTS provision. Outcomes were characterized using descriptive statistics and differences in scales scores across pharmacy locations (rural vs. urban) and types (corporately-vs. independently-owned) were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Predictors of FTS provision intentions were evaluated using multiple linear regression (alpha=0.05).

Results: Respondents (N = 131; 3.82% response rate) were mostly female (64%) and Caucasian (92%). No respondents stocked FTS at their pharmacy and knowledge about FTS was low (mean[SD] knowledge score: 58.7% [15.1]). Despite the existence of perceived barriers (mean [SD] scale score: 3.2 [0.6]), pharmacists' general attitudes (3.4 [0.5]), perceived benefits (3.7 [0.6]), self-efficacy (3.1 [0.8]), and intentions (3.2[0.7]) were positive. While subjective norms were positive (3.5[0.6]), PBC over FTS decision-making was negative (2.7[0.8]). Subjective norms were higher (P = 0.040) and PBC was lower (P < 0.001) amongst corporately-versus independently-owned pharmacies, but no differences existed between rural and urban locations for any measures. Additionally, perceived benefits (β=0.342, P = 0.002), PBC (β = 0.133, P = 0.045), and self-efficacy (β = 0.142, P = 0.034) were positive predictors and perceived barriers (β = -0.211, P = 0.029) was a negative predictor of intention.

Conclusion: Alabama community pharmacists have positive attitudes regarding FTS, but future research should focus on strategies to increase PBC and overcome perceived barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Exploration of Network Facilitator Experiences Implementing Payer-Partner Programs within a Nationwide Clinically Integrated Network. Feasibility of reaching populations at high risk for HIV in community pharmacies. How New Pharmacists Handled COVID-19 Misinformation: A Qualitative Study. Because I See You: Pharmacist Social Determinants of Health as Predictor of Structural Awareness. Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Employment Status Change for Practicing Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1