正在研究的成人注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)治疗方法。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105774
Guilherme Fusetto Veronesi , Alessandra Gabellone , Anneka Tomlinson , Marco Solmi , Christoph U. Correll , Samuele Cortese
{"title":"正在研究的成人注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)治疗方法。","authors":"Guilherme Fusetto Veronesi ,&nbsp;Alessandra Gabellone ,&nbsp;Anneka Tomlinson ,&nbsp;Marco Solmi ,&nbsp;Christoph U. Correll ,&nbsp;Samuele Cortese","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To provide an overview of treatments in the pipeline for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), we searched <span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/and</span><svg><path></path></svg> and <span>https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/</span><svg><path></path></svg> from 01/01/2010–10/18/2023 for ongoing or completed phase 2 or 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), assessing pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for adults with ADHD with no current regulatory approval. We found 90 eligible RCTs. Of these, 24 (27 %) reported results with statistical analysis for primary efficacy endpoints. While several pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions had evidence of superiority compared to the control condition from a single RCT, centanafadine (norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin re-uptake inhibitor) was the only treatment with evidence of efficacy on ADHD core symptoms (small effect size=0.28–0.40) replicated in at least one additional RCT, alongside reasonable tolerability. Overall, the body of ongoing RCTs in adults with ADHD is insufficient, without any intervention on the horizon to match the efficacy of stimulant treatment or atomoxetine and with better tolerability profile. Additional effective and well tolerated treatments for adults with ADHD require development and testing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424002434/pdfft?md5=2ce6261be6ed1977838973ac74491cde&pid=1-s2.0-S0149763424002434-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatments in the pipeline for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Fusetto Veronesi ,&nbsp;Alessandra Gabellone ,&nbsp;Anneka Tomlinson ,&nbsp;Marco Solmi ,&nbsp;Christoph U. Correll ,&nbsp;Samuele Cortese\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To provide an overview of treatments in the pipeline for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), we searched <span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/and</span><svg><path></path></svg> and <span>https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/</span><svg><path></path></svg> from 01/01/2010–10/18/2023 for ongoing or completed phase 2 or 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), assessing pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for adults with ADHD with no current regulatory approval. We found 90 eligible RCTs. Of these, 24 (27 %) reported results with statistical analysis for primary efficacy endpoints. While several pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions had evidence of superiority compared to the control condition from a single RCT, centanafadine (norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin re-uptake inhibitor) was the only treatment with evidence of efficacy on ADHD core symptoms (small effect size=0.28–0.40) replicated in at least one additional RCT, alongside reasonable tolerability. Overall, the body of ongoing RCTs in adults with ADHD is insufficient, without any intervention on the horizon to match the efficacy of stimulant treatment or atomoxetine and with better tolerability profile. Additional effective and well tolerated treatments for adults with ADHD require development and testing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424002434/pdfft?md5=2ce6261be6ed1977838973ac74491cde&pid=1-s2.0-S0149763424002434-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424002434\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424002434","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了概述正在研究中的成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)治疗方法,我们检索了 https://clinicaltrials.gov/and 和 https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/(时间:01/01/2010-10/18/2023)正在进行或已完成的 2 期或 3 期随机对照试验 (RCT),这些试验评估了针对成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的药物或非药物干预措施,目前尚未获得监管部门的批准。我们发现了 90 项符合条件的 RCT。其中 24 项(27%)报告了主要疗效终点的统计分析结果。虽然多项药物和非药物干预措施都有证据表明,与单项临床试验中的对照组相比具有优越性,但 centanafadine(去甲肾上腺素、多巴胺和 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂)是唯一有证据表明对多动症核心症状具有疗效(小效应量=0.28-0.40),并在至少一项额外的临床试验中得到重复的治疗方法,同时还具有合理的耐受性。总体而言,目前针对成人多动症患者的 RCT 研究尚不充分,没有任何干预措施能与兴奋剂治疗或阿托西汀的疗效相媲美,而且耐受性更好。需要开发和测试更多有效且耐受性良好的成人多动症治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatments in the pipeline for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults

To provide an overview of treatments in the pipeline for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), we searched https://clinicaltrials.gov/and and https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ from 01/01/2010–10/18/2023 for ongoing or completed phase 2 or 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), assessing pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for adults with ADHD with no current regulatory approval. We found 90 eligible RCTs. Of these, 24 (27 %) reported results with statistical analysis for primary efficacy endpoints. While several pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions had evidence of superiority compared to the control condition from a single RCT, centanafadine (norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin re-uptake inhibitor) was the only treatment with evidence of efficacy on ADHD core symptoms (small effect size=0.28–0.40) replicated in at least one additional RCT, alongside reasonable tolerability. Overall, the body of ongoing RCTs in adults with ADHD is insufficient, without any intervention on the horizon to match the efficacy of stimulant treatment or atomoxetine and with better tolerability profile. Additional effective and well tolerated treatments for adults with ADHD require development and testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Enhancing methodological rigor in meta-analyses assessing suicidal risk in mood disorders Editorial Board Aesthetic processing in neurodiverse populations Unveiling the neurolipidome of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A scoping review navigating future diagnostic and therapeutic applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1