评估诊断成像临床价值所需的证据类型。

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1056/EVIDra2300252
Carly Stewart, Matthew S Davenport, Diana L Miglioretti, Rebecca Smith-Bindman
{"title":"评估诊断成像临床价值所需的证据类型。","authors":"Carly Stewart, Matthew S Davenport, Diana L Miglioretti, Rebecca Smith-Bindman","doi":"10.1056/EVIDra2300252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractThe evidence underlying the use of advanced diagnostic imaging is based mainly on diagnostic accuracy studies and not on well-designed trials demonstrating improved patient outcomes. This has led to an expansion of low-value and potentially harmful patient care and raises ethical issues around the widespread implementation of tests with incompletely known benefits and harms. Randomized clinical trials are needed to support the safety and effectiveness of imaging tests and should be required for clearance of most new technologies. Large, diverse cohort studies are needed to quantify disease risk associated with many imaging findings, especially incidental findings, to enable evidence-based management. The responsibility to minimize the use of tests with unknown or low value requires engagement of clinicians, medical societies, and the public.</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"3 7","pages":"EVIDra2300252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Types of Evidence Needed to Assess the Clinical Value of Diagnostic Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Carly Stewart, Matthew S Davenport, Diana L Miglioretti, Rebecca Smith-Bindman\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/EVIDra2300252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AbstractThe evidence underlying the use of advanced diagnostic imaging is based mainly on diagnostic accuracy studies and not on well-designed trials demonstrating improved patient outcomes. This has led to an expansion of low-value and potentially harmful patient care and raises ethical issues around the widespread implementation of tests with incompletely known benefits and harms. Randomized clinical trials are needed to support the safety and effectiveness of imaging tests and should be required for clearance of most new technologies. Large, diverse cohort studies are needed to quantify disease risk associated with many imaging findings, especially incidental findings, to enable evidence-based management. The responsibility to minimize the use of tests with unknown or low value requires engagement of clinicians, medical societies, and the public.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEJM evidence\",\"volume\":\"3 7\",\"pages\":\"EVIDra2300252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEJM evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDra2300252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDra2300252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要使用先进诊断成像技术的证据主要基于诊断准确性研究,而不是设计良好、能证明改善患者预后的试验。这导致了低价值和可能有害的患者护理的扩大,并引发了广泛实施益处和害处不完全清楚的检查的伦理问题。需要进行随机临床试验来支持成像检测的安全性和有效性,而且大多数新技术的审批都应要求进行随机临床试验。需要开展大型、多样化的队列研究,量化与许多成像结果(尤其是偶然发现)相关的疾病风险,以便进行循证管理。尽量减少使用价值不明或价值较低的检查项目需要临床医生、医学会和公众的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Types of Evidence Needed to Assess the Clinical Value of Diagnostic Imaging.

AbstractThe evidence underlying the use of advanced diagnostic imaging is based mainly on diagnostic accuracy studies and not on well-designed trials demonstrating improved patient outcomes. This has led to an expansion of low-value and potentially harmful patient care and raises ethical issues around the widespread implementation of tests with incompletely known benefits and harms. Randomized clinical trials are needed to support the safety and effectiveness of imaging tests and should be required for clearance of most new technologies. Large, diverse cohort studies are needed to quantify disease risk associated with many imaging findings, especially incidental findings, to enable evidence-based management. The responsibility to minimize the use of tests with unknown or low value requires engagement of clinicians, medical societies, and the public.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Pressure Targets for Adults with Vasodilatory Shock - An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. BNC210, an α7 Nicotinic Receptor Modulator, in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. A Meta-Analysis of Levofloxacin for Contacts of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Treating Patients, Not P Values. A 50-Year-Old Man with Left-Sided Weakness and Difficulty Speaking Clearly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1