Judith Ju Ming Wong, Hongxing Dang, Chin Seng Gan, Phuc Huu Phan, Hiroshi Kurosawa, Kazunori Aoki, Siew Wah Lee, Jacqueline Soo May Ong, Li Jia Fan, Chian Wern Tai, Soo Lin Chuah, Pei Chuen Lee, Yek Kee Chor, Louise Ngu, Nattachai Anantasit, Chunfeng Liu, Wei Xu, Dyah Kanya Wati, Suparyatha Ida Bagus Gede, Muralidharan Jayashree, Felix Liauw, Kah Min Pon, Li Huang, Jia Yueh Chong, Xuemei Zhu, Kam Lun Ellis Hon, Karen Ka Yan Leung, Rujipat Samransamruajkit, Yin Bun Cheung, Jan Hau Lee
{"title":"小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征的肺保护性通气：非随机对照试验。","authors":"Judith Ju Ming Wong, Hongxing Dang, Chin Seng Gan, Phuc Huu Phan, Hiroshi Kurosawa, Kazunori Aoki, Siew Wah Lee, Jacqueline Soo May Ong, Li Jia Fan, Chian Wern Tai, Soo Lin Chuah, Pei Chuen Lee, Yek Kee Chor, Louise Ngu, Nattachai Anantasit, Chunfeng Liu, Wei Xu, Dyah Kanya Wati, Suparyatha Ida Bagus Gede, Muralidharan Jayashree, Felix Liauw, Kah Min Pon, Li Huang, Jia Yueh Chong, Xuemei Zhu, Kam Lun Ellis Hon, Karen Ka Yan Leung, Rujipat Samransamruajkit, Yin Bun Cheung, Jan Hau Lee","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the recommendation for lung-protective mechanical ventilation (LPMV) in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS), there is a lack of robust supporting data and variable adherence in clinical practice. This study evaluates the impact of an LPMV protocol vs. standard care and adherence to LPMV elements on mortality. We hypothesized that LPMV strategies deployed as a pragmatic protocol reduces mortality in PARDS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter prospective before-and-after comparison design study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty-one PICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients fulfilled the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference 2015 definition of PARDS and were on invasive mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The LPMV protocol included a limit on peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), delta/driving pressure (DP), tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to F io2 combinations of the low PEEP acute respiratory distress syndrome network table, permissive hypercarbia, and conservative oxygen targets.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>There were 285 of 693 (41·1%) and 408 of 693 (58·9%) patients treated with and without the LPMV protocol, respectively. Median age and oxygenation index was 1.5 years (0.4-5.3 yr) and 10.9 years (7.0-18.6 yr), respectively. There was no difference in 60-day mortality between LPMV and non-LPMV protocol groups (65/285 [22.8%] vs. 115/406 [28.3%]; p = 0.104). However, total adherence score did improve in the LPMV compared to non-LPMV group (57.1 [40.0-66.7] vs. 47.6 [31.0-58.3]; p < 0·001). After adjusting for confounders, adherence to LPMV strategies (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99; p = 0.004) but not the LPMV protocol itself was associated with a reduced risk of 60-day mortality. Adherence to PIP, DP, and PEEP/F io2 combinations were associated with reduced mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adherence to LPMV elements over the first week of PARDS was associated with reduced mortality. Future work is needed to improve implementation of LPMV in order to improve adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1602-1611"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung-Protective Ventilation for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Judith Ju Ming Wong, Hongxing Dang, Chin Seng Gan, Phuc Huu Phan, Hiroshi Kurosawa, Kazunori Aoki, Siew Wah Lee, Jacqueline Soo May Ong, Li Jia Fan, Chian Wern Tai, Soo Lin Chuah, Pei Chuen Lee, Yek Kee Chor, Louise Ngu, Nattachai Anantasit, Chunfeng Liu, Wei Xu, Dyah Kanya Wati, Suparyatha Ida Bagus Gede, Muralidharan Jayashree, Felix Liauw, Kah Min Pon, Li Huang, Jia Yueh Chong, Xuemei Zhu, Kam Lun Ellis Hon, Karen Ka Yan Leung, Rujipat Samransamruajkit, Yin Bun Cheung, Jan Hau Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the recommendation for lung-protective mechanical ventilation (LPMV) in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS), there is a lack of robust supporting data and variable adherence in clinical practice. This study evaluates the impact of an LPMV protocol vs. standard care and adherence to LPMV elements on mortality. We hypothesized that LPMV strategies deployed as a pragmatic protocol reduces mortality in PARDS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter prospective before-and-after comparison design study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty-one PICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients fulfilled the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference 2015 definition of PARDS and were on invasive mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The LPMV protocol included a limit on peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), delta/driving pressure (DP), tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to F io2 combinations of the low PEEP acute respiratory distress syndrome network table, permissive hypercarbia, and conservative oxygen targets.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>There were 285 of 693 (41·1%) and 408 of 693 (58·9%) patients treated with and without the LPMV protocol, respectively. Median age and oxygenation index was 1.5 years (0.4-5.3 yr) and 10.9 years (7.0-18.6 yr), respectively. There was no difference in 60-day mortality between LPMV and non-LPMV protocol groups (65/285 [22.8%] vs. 115/406 [28.3%]; p = 0.104). However, total adherence score did improve in the LPMV compared to non-LPMV group (57.1 [40.0-66.7] vs. 47.6 [31.0-58.3]; p < 0·001). After adjusting for confounders, adherence to LPMV strategies (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99; p = 0.004) but not the LPMV protocol itself was associated with a reduced risk of 60-day mortality. Adherence to PIP, DP, and PEEP/F io2 combinations were associated with reduced mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adherence to LPMV elements over the first week of PARDS was associated with reduced mortality. Future work is needed to improve implementation of LPMV in order to improve adherence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1602-1611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006357\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lung-Protective Ventilation for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
Objectives: Despite the recommendation for lung-protective mechanical ventilation (LPMV) in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS), there is a lack of robust supporting data and variable adherence in clinical practice. This study evaluates the impact of an LPMV protocol vs. standard care and adherence to LPMV elements on mortality. We hypothesized that LPMV strategies deployed as a pragmatic protocol reduces mortality in PARDS.
Patients: Patients fulfilled the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference 2015 definition of PARDS and were on invasive mechanical ventilation.
Interventions: The LPMV protocol included a limit on peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), delta/driving pressure (DP), tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to F io2 combinations of the low PEEP acute respiratory distress syndrome network table, permissive hypercarbia, and conservative oxygen targets.
Measurements and main results: There were 285 of 693 (41·1%) and 408 of 693 (58·9%) patients treated with and without the LPMV protocol, respectively. Median age and oxygenation index was 1.5 years (0.4-5.3 yr) and 10.9 years (7.0-18.6 yr), respectively. There was no difference in 60-day mortality between LPMV and non-LPMV protocol groups (65/285 [22.8%] vs. 115/406 [28.3%]; p = 0.104). However, total adherence score did improve in the LPMV compared to non-LPMV group (57.1 [40.0-66.7] vs. 47.6 [31.0-58.3]; p < 0·001). After adjusting for confounders, adherence to LPMV strategies (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99; p = 0.004) but not the LPMV protocol itself was associated with a reduced risk of 60-day mortality. Adherence to PIP, DP, and PEEP/F io2 combinations were associated with reduced mortality.
Conclusions: Adherence to LPMV elements over the first week of PARDS was associated with reduced mortality. Future work is needed to improve implementation of LPMV in order to improve adherence.
期刊介绍：
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
