Özge Uçar, Sevim Çelik, Elif Karahan, Sibel Altıntaş, Meryem Yücel
{"title":"探索在重症监护诊所工作的 X、Y 和 Z 代护士的精神关怀与患者权益之间的关系:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Özge Uçar, Sevim Çelik, Elif Karahan, Sibel Altıntaş, Meryem Yücel","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the relationship between spiritual care and patient advocacy across three generations of nurses working in intensive care units.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional survey.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data collection took place from July to August 2022 with 120 nurses in Turkey. Data collection tools included the Spiritual Caregiving Competency Scale, the Spirituality and Spiritual Care Assessment Scale, and the Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses. Data on nurses’ demographics were evaluated using descriptive statistical methods (number, percentage, mean, standard deviation). Independent sample <em>t</em>-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and linear multiple regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationships between variables, with results reported as 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>More than half of the nurses were from Generation Y (39.2 %) and Generation Z (42.5 %). Generation Z’s mean patient advocacy score (156.96 ± 23.16) was statistically significantly higher than Generation X’s (139.32 ± 34.26). We determined that the spiritual competence scale communication sub-dimension score of Generation Y nurses working between 1–10 years was higher than that of Generation Z nurses. Additionally, as the patient advocacy scores of all generations increased, so did spiritual competence scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study found differences in patient advocacy and spiritual care competencies between generations. Thus, we recommend organizing courses, seminars, and in-service training on patient advocacy and spiritual care for intensive care nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><p>This study estimates nurses’ spiritual care competencies and patient advocacy levels from different generations and sheds light on the literature to eliminate differences in care between generations in nursing practices that evolve and change over time. It is recommended that courses, seminars, in-service training, spiritual activities, and interactive meetings be organized to encourage the participation of intensive care nurses to minimize the differences in spiritual care and patient advocacy among all generations of intensive care nurses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the relationship between spiritual care and patient advocacy of nurses from generations X, Y and Z working in intensive care clinics: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Özge Uçar, Sevim Çelik, Elif Karahan, Sibel Altıntaş, Meryem Yücel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the relationship between spiritual care and patient advocacy across three generations of nurses working in intensive care units.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional survey.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data collection took place from July to August 2022 with 120 nurses in Turkey. Data collection tools included the Spiritual Caregiving Competency Scale, the Spirituality and Spiritual Care Assessment Scale, and the Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses. Data on nurses’ demographics were evaluated using descriptive statistical methods (number, percentage, mean, standard deviation). Independent sample <em>t</em>-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and linear multiple regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationships between variables, with results reported as 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>More than half of the nurses were from Generation Y (39.2 %) and Generation Z (42.5 %). Generation Z’s mean patient advocacy score (156.96 ± 23.16) was statistically significantly higher than Generation X’s (139.32 ± 34.26). We determined that the spiritual competence scale communication sub-dimension score of Generation Y nurses working between 1–10 years was higher than that of Generation Z nurses. Additionally, as the patient advocacy scores of all generations increased, so did spiritual competence scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study found differences in patient advocacy and spiritual care competencies between generations. Thus, we recommend organizing courses, seminars, and in-service training on patient advocacy and spiritual care for intensive care nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><p>This study estimates nurses’ spiritual care competencies and patient advocacy levels from different generations and sheds light on the literature to eliminate differences in care between generations in nursing practices that evolve and change over time. It is recommended that courses, seminars, in-service training, spiritual activities, and interactive meetings be organized to encourage the participation of intensive care nurses to minimize the differences in spiritual care and patient advocacy among all generations of intensive care nurses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001393\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的确定在重症监护室工作的三代护士的精神关怀与患者权益之间的关系:设计:横断面调查:数据收集工作于 2022 年 7 月至 8 月在土耳其进行,共有 120 名护士参加。数据收集工具包括灵性护理能力量表、灵性和灵性护理评估量表以及护士患者权益维护量表。使用描述性统计方法(数量、百分比、平均值、标准差)对护士的人口统计学数据进行评估。采用独立样本 t 检验、单因素方差分析、皮尔逊相关分析和线性多元回归分析评估变量之间的关系,结果以 95% 的置信区间 (CI) 报告:一半以上的护士来自 Y 世代(39.2%)和 Z 世代(42.5%)。从统计学角度看,Z 世代的患者权益平均得分(156.96 ± 23.16)明显高于 X 世代(139.32 ± 34.26)。我们发现,工作年限在 1-10 年之间的 Y 代护士的精神能力量表沟通子维度得分高于 Z 代护士。此外,随着各代护士的患者权益维护得分的增加,精神能力得分也在增加:研究发现,各代人在患者权益维护和心灵关怀能力方面存在差异。因此,我们建议为重症监护护士组织有关患者权益维护和心灵关怀的课程、研讨会和在职培训:本研究估算了不同年代护士的精神护理能力和患者权益维护水平,为消除护理实践中随时间演变和变化的代际护理差异提供了文献启示。建议组织课程、研讨会、在职培训、心灵活动和互动会议,鼓励重症监护护士参与,以尽量减少各代重症监护护士在心灵关怀和患者权益维护方面的差异。
Exploring the relationship between spiritual care and patient advocacy of nurses from generations X, Y and Z working in intensive care clinics: A cross-sectional study
Objective
To determine the relationship between spiritual care and patient advocacy across three generations of nurses working in intensive care units.
Design
Cross-sectional survey.
Methods
Data collection took place from July to August 2022 with 120 nurses in Turkey. Data collection tools included the Spiritual Caregiving Competency Scale, the Spirituality and Spiritual Care Assessment Scale, and the Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses. Data on nurses’ demographics were evaluated using descriptive statistical methods (number, percentage, mean, standard deviation). Independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and linear multiple regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationships between variables, with results reported as 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
More than half of the nurses were from Generation Y (39.2 %) and Generation Z (42.5 %). Generation Z’s mean patient advocacy score (156.96 ± 23.16) was statistically significantly higher than Generation X’s (139.32 ± 34.26). We determined that the spiritual competence scale communication sub-dimension score of Generation Y nurses working between 1–10 years was higher than that of Generation Z nurses. Additionally, as the patient advocacy scores of all generations increased, so did spiritual competence scores.
Conclusion
The study found differences in patient advocacy and spiritual care competencies between generations. Thus, we recommend organizing courses, seminars, and in-service training on patient advocacy and spiritual care for intensive care nurses.
Implications for clinical practice
This study estimates nurses’ spiritual care competencies and patient advocacy levels from different generations and sheds light on the literature to eliminate differences in care between generations in nursing practices that evolve and change over time. It is recommended that courses, seminars, in-service training, spiritual activities, and interactive meetings be organized to encourage the participation of intensive care nurses to minimize the differences in spiritual care and patient advocacy among all generations of intensive care nurses.
期刊介绍:
The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.