探索在重症监护诊所工作的 X、Y 和 Z 代护士的精神关怀与患者权益之间的关系:一项横断面研究。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103754
Özge Uçar, Sevim Çelik, Elif Karahan, Sibel Altıntaş, Meryem Yücel
{"title":"探索在重症监护诊所工作的 X、Y 和 Z 代护士的精神关怀与患者权益之间的关系:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Özge Uçar,&nbsp;Sevim Çelik,&nbsp;Elif Karahan,&nbsp;Sibel Altıntaş,&nbsp;Meryem Yücel","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the relationship between spiritual care and patient advocacy across three generations of nurses working in intensive care units.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional survey.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data collection took place from July to August 2022 with 120 nurses in Turkey. Data collection tools included the Spiritual Caregiving Competency Scale, the Spirituality and Spiritual Care Assessment Scale, and the Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses. Data on nurses’ demographics were evaluated using descriptive statistical methods (number, percentage, mean, standard deviation). Independent sample <em>t</em>-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and linear multiple regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationships between variables, with results reported as 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>More than half of the nurses were from Generation Y (39.2 %) and Generation Z (42.5 %). Generation Z’s mean patient advocacy score (156.96 ± 23.16) was statistically significantly higher than Generation X’s (139.32 ± 34.26). We determined that the spiritual competence scale communication sub-dimension score of Generation Y nurses working between 1–10 years was higher than that of Generation Z nurses. Additionally, as the patient advocacy scores of all generations increased, so did spiritual competence scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study found differences in patient advocacy and spiritual care competencies between generations. Thus, we recommend organizing courses, seminars, and in-service training on patient advocacy and spiritual care for intensive care nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><p>This study estimates nurses’ spiritual care competencies and patient advocacy levels from different generations and sheds light on the literature to eliminate differences in care between generations in nursing practices that evolve and change over time. It is recommended that courses, seminars, in-service training, spiritual activities, and interactive meetings be organized to encourage the participation of intensive care nurses to minimize the differences in spiritual care and patient advocacy among all generations of intensive care nurses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the relationship between spiritual care and patient advocacy of nurses from generations X, Y and Z working in intensive care clinics: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Özge Uçar,&nbsp;Sevim Çelik,&nbsp;Elif Karahan,&nbsp;Sibel Altıntaş,&nbsp;Meryem Yücel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the relationship between spiritual care and patient advocacy across three generations of nurses working in intensive care units.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional survey.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data collection took place from July to August 2022 with 120 nurses in Turkey. Data collection tools included the Spiritual Caregiving Competency Scale, the Spirituality and Spiritual Care Assessment Scale, and the Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses. Data on nurses’ demographics were evaluated using descriptive statistical methods (number, percentage, mean, standard deviation). Independent sample <em>t</em>-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and linear multiple regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationships between variables, with results reported as 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>More than half of the nurses were from Generation Y (39.2 %) and Generation Z (42.5 %). Generation Z’s mean patient advocacy score (156.96 ± 23.16) was statistically significantly higher than Generation X’s (139.32 ± 34.26). We determined that the spiritual competence scale communication sub-dimension score of Generation Y nurses working between 1–10 years was higher than that of Generation Z nurses. Additionally, as the patient advocacy scores of all generations increased, so did spiritual competence scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study found differences in patient advocacy and spiritual care competencies between generations. Thus, we recommend organizing courses, seminars, and in-service training on patient advocacy and spiritual care for intensive care nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><p>This study estimates nurses’ spiritual care competencies and patient advocacy levels from different generations and sheds light on the literature to eliminate differences in care between generations in nursing practices that evolve and change over time. It is recommended that courses, seminars, in-service training, spiritual activities, and interactive meetings be organized to encourage the participation of intensive care nurses to minimize the differences in spiritual care and patient advocacy among all generations of intensive care nurses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001393\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定在重症监护室工作的三代护士的精神关怀与患者权益之间的关系:设计:横断面调查:数据收集工作于 2022 年 7 月至 8 月在土耳其进行,共有 120 名护士参加。数据收集工具包括灵性护理能力量表、灵性和灵性护理评估量表以及护士患者权益维护量表。使用描述性统计方法(数量、百分比、平均值、标准差)对护士的人口统计学数据进行评估。采用独立样本 t 检验、单因素方差分析、皮尔逊相关分析和线性多元回归分析评估变量之间的关系,结果以 95% 的置信区间 (CI) 报告:一半以上的护士来自 Y 世代(39.2%)和 Z 世代(42.5%)。从统计学角度看,Z 世代的患者权益平均得分(156.96 ± 23.16)明显高于 X 世代(139.32 ± 34.26)。我们发现,工作年限在 1-10 年之间的 Y 代护士的精神能力量表沟通子维度得分高于 Z 代护士。此外,随着各代护士的患者权益维护得分的增加,精神能力得分也在增加:研究发现,各代人在患者权益维护和心灵关怀能力方面存在差异。因此,我们建议为重症监护护士组织有关患者权益维护和心灵关怀的课程、研讨会和在职培训:本研究估算了不同年代护士的精神护理能力和患者权益维护水平,为消除护理实践中随时间演变和变化的代际护理差异提供了文献启示。建议组织课程、研讨会、在职培训、心灵活动和互动会议,鼓励重症监护护士参与,以尽量减少各代重症监护护士在心灵关怀和患者权益维护方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the relationship between spiritual care and patient advocacy of nurses from generations X, Y and Z working in intensive care clinics: A cross-sectional study

Objective

To determine the relationship between spiritual care and patient advocacy across three generations of nurses working in intensive care units.

Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Methods

Data collection took place from July to August 2022 with 120 nurses in Turkey. Data collection tools included the Spiritual Caregiving Competency Scale, the Spirituality and Spiritual Care Assessment Scale, and the Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses. Data on nurses’ demographics were evaluated using descriptive statistical methods (number, percentage, mean, standard deviation). Independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and linear multiple regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationships between variables, with results reported as 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

More than half of the nurses were from Generation Y (39.2 %) and Generation Z (42.5 %). Generation Z’s mean patient advocacy score (156.96 ± 23.16) was statistically significantly higher than Generation X’s (139.32 ± 34.26). We determined that the spiritual competence scale communication sub-dimension score of Generation Y nurses working between 1–10 years was higher than that of Generation Z nurses. Additionally, as the patient advocacy scores of all generations increased, so did spiritual competence scores.

Conclusion

The study found differences in patient advocacy and spiritual care competencies between generations. Thus, we recommend organizing courses, seminars, and in-service training on patient advocacy and spiritual care for intensive care nurses.

Implications for clinical practice

This study estimates nurses’ spiritual care competencies and patient advocacy levels from different generations and sheds light on the literature to eliminate differences in care between generations in nursing practices that evolve and change over time. It is recommended that courses, seminars, in-service training, spiritual activities, and interactive meetings be organized to encourage the participation of intensive care nurses to minimize the differences in spiritual care and patient advocacy among all generations of intensive care nurses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
“I will get out of this” - The patients’ experiences of early mobilisation in intensive care. A hermeneutic study Flexible ICU visiting: Improving family outcomes while navigating implementation challenges How to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in trauma patients Early changes in skin surface temperature to predict fever – Response to Xie et al. Intensive care nurses’ provision of culturally sensitive care through communication at the end-of-life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1