用于估算东非曼德瓦盆地源岩热成熟度的新型混合机器学习方法和盆地模型

IF 4.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Natural Resources Research Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1007/s11053-024-10372-y
Christopher N. Mkono, Chuanbo Shen, Alvin K. Mulashani, Mbega Ramadhani Ngata, Wakeel Hussain
{"title":"用于估算东非曼德瓦盆地源岩热成熟度的新型混合机器学习方法和盆地模型","authors":"Christopher N. Mkono, Chuanbo Shen, Alvin K. Mulashani, Mbega Ramadhani Ngata, Wakeel Hussain","doi":"10.1007/s11053-024-10372-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Basin modeling and thermal maturity estimation are crucial for understanding sedimentary basin evolution and hydrocarbon potential. Assessing thermal maturity in the oil and gas industry is vital during exploration. With artificial intelligence advancements, more accurate evaluation of hydrocarbon source rocks and efficient thermal maturity estimation are possible. This study employed 1D basin modeling using PetroMod and a novel hybrid group method of data handling (GMDH) neural network optimized by a differential evolution (DE) algorithm to estimate thermal maturity (Tmax) and assess kerogen type in Triassic–Jurassic source rocks of the Mandawa Basin, Tanzania. The GMDH–DE addresses the limitations of conventional methods by offering a data-driven approach that reduces computational time, overcomes overfitting, and improves accuracy. The 1D thermal maturity basin modeling suggests that the Mbuo source rocks reached the gas–oil window in late Triassic times and began expulsion in the early Jurassic while located in an immature-to-mature zone. The GMDH–DE model effectively estimated Tmax with high coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9946), low root mean square error (RMSE = 0.004), and mean absolute error (MAE = 0.006) during training. When tested on unseen data, the GMDH–DE model yielded an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.9703, RMSE of 0.017, and MAE of 0.025. Moreover, GMDH–DE reduced the computational time by 94% during training and 87% during testing. The results demonstrated the model’s exceptional reliability compared to the benchmark methods such as artificial neural network–particle swarm optimization and principal component analysis coupled with artificial neural network. The GMDH–DE Tmax model offers a unique and independent approach for rapid real-time determination of Tmax values in organic matter, promoting efficient resource assessment in oil and gas exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Hybrid Machine Learning Approach and Basin Modeling for Thermal Maturity Estimation of Source Rocks in Mandawa Basin, East Africa\",\"authors\":\"Christopher N. Mkono, Chuanbo Shen, Alvin K. Mulashani, Mbega Ramadhani Ngata, Wakeel Hussain\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11053-024-10372-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Basin modeling and thermal maturity estimation are crucial for understanding sedimentary basin evolution and hydrocarbon potential. Assessing thermal maturity in the oil and gas industry is vital during exploration. With artificial intelligence advancements, more accurate evaluation of hydrocarbon source rocks and efficient thermal maturity estimation are possible. This study employed 1D basin modeling using PetroMod and a novel hybrid group method of data handling (GMDH) neural network optimized by a differential evolution (DE) algorithm to estimate thermal maturity (Tmax) and assess kerogen type in Triassic–Jurassic source rocks of the Mandawa Basin, Tanzania. The GMDH–DE addresses the limitations of conventional methods by offering a data-driven approach that reduces computational time, overcomes overfitting, and improves accuracy. The 1D thermal maturity basin modeling suggests that the Mbuo source rocks reached the gas–oil window in late Triassic times and began expulsion in the early Jurassic while located in an immature-to-mature zone. The GMDH–DE model effectively estimated Tmax with high coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9946), low root mean square error (RMSE = 0.004), and mean absolute error (MAE = 0.006) during training. When tested on unseen data, the GMDH–DE model yielded an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.9703, RMSE of 0.017, and MAE of 0.025. Moreover, GMDH–DE reduced the computational time by 94% during training and 87% during testing. The results demonstrated the model’s exceptional reliability compared to the benchmark methods such as artificial neural network–particle swarm optimization and principal component analysis coupled with artificial neural network. The GMDH–DE Tmax model offers a unique and independent approach for rapid real-time determination of Tmax values in organic matter, promoting efficient resource assessment in oil and gas exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Resources Research\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Resources Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10372-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10372-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

盆地建模和热成熟度估算对于了解沉积盆地演化和油气潜力至关重要。在石油和天然气行业的勘探过程中,评估热成熟度至关重要。随着人工智能的进步,可以对碳氢化合物源岩进行更准确的评估和更有效的热成熟度估算。本研究采用 PetroMod 进行一维盆地建模,并通过差分进化(DE)算法优化新型混合数据处理组法(GMDH)神经网络,以估算热成熟度(Tmax)并评估坦桑尼亚曼达瓦盆地三叠纪-侏罗纪源岩的角质类型。GMDH-DE 解决了传统方法的局限性,提供了一种数据驱动的方法,减少了计算时间,克服了过拟合,提高了准确性。一维热成熟度盆地模型表明,姆布源岩于三叠纪晚期达到气油窗口,侏罗纪早期开始排出,当时位于未成熟至成熟带。在训练过程中,GMDH-DE模型有效地估算了Tmax,具有较高的决定系数(R2 = 0.9946)、较低的均方根误差(RMSE = 0.004)和平均绝对误差(MAE = 0.006)。对未见数据进行测试时,GMDH-DE 模型的 R2 为 0.9703,RMSE 为 0.017,MAE 为 0.025。此外,GMDH-DE 模型在训练过程中减少了 94% 的计算时间,在测试过程中减少了 87% 的计算时间。结果表明,与人工神经网络-粒子群优化和主成分分析-人工神经网络等基准方法相比,该模型具有卓越的可靠性。GMDH-DE Tmax 模型为快速实时测定有机物中的 Tmax 值提供了一种独特而独立的方法,促进了石油和天然气勘探中的高效资源评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Novel Hybrid Machine Learning Approach and Basin Modeling for Thermal Maturity Estimation of Source Rocks in Mandawa Basin, East Africa

Basin modeling and thermal maturity estimation are crucial for understanding sedimentary basin evolution and hydrocarbon potential. Assessing thermal maturity in the oil and gas industry is vital during exploration. With artificial intelligence advancements, more accurate evaluation of hydrocarbon source rocks and efficient thermal maturity estimation are possible. This study employed 1D basin modeling using PetroMod and a novel hybrid group method of data handling (GMDH) neural network optimized by a differential evolution (DE) algorithm to estimate thermal maturity (Tmax) and assess kerogen type in Triassic–Jurassic source rocks of the Mandawa Basin, Tanzania. The GMDH–DE addresses the limitations of conventional methods by offering a data-driven approach that reduces computational time, overcomes overfitting, and improves accuracy. The 1D thermal maturity basin modeling suggests that the Mbuo source rocks reached the gas–oil window in late Triassic times and began expulsion in the early Jurassic while located in an immature-to-mature zone. The GMDH–DE model effectively estimated Tmax with high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.9946), low root mean square error (RMSE = 0.004), and mean absolute error (MAE = 0.006) during training. When tested on unseen data, the GMDH–DE model yielded an R2 of 0.9703, RMSE of 0.017, and MAE of 0.025. Moreover, GMDH–DE reduced the computational time by 94% during training and 87% during testing. The results demonstrated the model’s exceptional reliability compared to the benchmark methods such as artificial neural network–particle swarm optimization and principal component analysis coupled with artificial neural network. The GMDH–DE Tmax model offers a unique and independent approach for rapid real-time determination of Tmax values in organic matter, promoting efficient resource assessment in oil and gas exploration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Resources Research
Natural Resources Research Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Petrophysical Characteristics of the Paleocene Zelten Formation in the Gialo Oil Field, Sirte Basin, Libya Research on Coal Reservoir Pore Structures: Progress, Current Status, and Advancing Lateritic Ni–Co Prospectivity Modeling in Eastern Australia Using an Enhanced Generative Adversarial Network and Positive-Unlabeled Bagging Risk-Based Optimization of Post-Blast Dig-Limits Incorporating Blast Movement and Grade Uncertainties with Multiple Destinations in Open-Pit Mines Correlation Between and Mechanisms of Gas Desorption and Infrasound Signals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1